Affecting Change
Environmental education is more important now than ever. With more than 7 billion people on the planet, we're consuming more resources at a faster rate than ever before. The effects we as a race are having on the environment are manifold and, in many cases, severe.
Our use of our natural resources is responsible for mass deforestation, the deaths of many species of plants and animals and the marring of much natural beauty. It has even taken a toll on our health, leading to increasing instances of asthma, lung diseases and diseases appearing in warm areas, such as malaria, dengue fever and yellow fever. Obtaining a forestry degree, biology degree from http://www.bio.purdue.edu or environmental sciences degree will help prepare you with more knowledge to help combat the spread of these negative effects, but even if you don't pursue a career related to the environment there's still much you can do to understand the environment, the effects the human race is having on it and what you can do to help change everything for the better. Understanding the ways that our species has impacted the world will help give you a clear picture of the nature of the problem and ensure the methods you use to aid the planet will align with your goals.
What's Happening
Scientists have concluded that climate changes on a recurring basis, going through cycles of hot and cold over periods of hundreds of years. Since the Industrial Revolution, however, this normal cycle has been sped up and increased in intensity, leading to the hottest decade in 400 years. This recent climate change has had many changes on various parts of our world, changing the atmosphere, temperature, weather and oceans. The accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is warming the land and oceans, affecting vegetation growth, killing marine species and contributing to the melting of the polar ice caps.
What We Have Done
The prevalence of greenhouse gases in the Earth's atmosphere is a result of the activities of mankind. Though some level of greenhouse gases is necessary to maintain the proper temperatures for life to exist on the planet, many man-made gases are now present in the atmosphere and the level of greenhouse gases has risen beyond natural levels. This is due to activities such as burning fossil fuels, producing and transporting fossil fuels, agricultural and industrial activities, and industrial processes, which variously release carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases. Forests have been cut down to supply the timber industry and make room for agricultural activities, resulting in a loss of forests and forest animals. Disasters, such as the recent BP oil spill, have further polluted the environment and killed plants and animals.
What We Can Do To Fix It
Researchers have discovered that electronics sitting in standby mode—not powered on yet still drawing power in order to respond quickly—account for around 10% of total residential electrical energy consumption in the U.S. This number is staggering not only because it equates to over $6 billion a year, but also because it's power that's wasted so that electronic devices can be power up a few seconds sooner. By unplugging or switching devices off at the outlet, we can save money on power and reduce the power required across the nation, eliminating a great deal of the need for more fossil fuel burning in power plants. By learning to reduce, then reuse and, finally recycle, we can eliminate waste while saving money that would have otherwise been spent purchasing items we don't truly need. Writing your state and federal representatives, asking them to support proposed laws that would reduce waste and pollution can help bring change at a state or national level. Whatever you do, make sure you're aware of your options and make the most of your actions.
- Josephbker's blog
- Log in or register to post comments

Comments
I have a question
Are you sure that the level of greenhouse gasses have risen beyond natural levels and can you cite the evidence?
It is my understanding that the geological records show various eras where there were MUCH higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and that life flourished during these periods and that they did not precipitate any sort of run-away positive reinforcement feedback effect that cooked the earth with ever increasing tempuratures as is often postulated by AGW science.
I'm all for reducing waste particularly if it saves me money. But I'm not to crazy about being motivated by so-called science that is filled with non-factual facts and is designed for the purpose of fear mongering.
This is completely off topic,
This is completely off topic, but I recommend watching this lecture: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-aghvMQMR8
And yes, I am slightly biased. But I think you'll enjoy it based on your comment, Jack.
Indeed
Indeed it did seem to be off topic. It was an hour long video. I skipped around in it and maybe watched for 5 minutes. In that time I heard two things that stuck with me:
1) People do not want the government or insurance companies making their health decisions. They want Doctors to make them. This makes Doctors very important. (I already knew this.)
2) 50% of what doctors learn in medical school will be proven wrong within 10 years. The problem is that nobody knows WHICH 50%. Doctors are not great at discarding the bad info and replacing it with updated info. This causes Doctors, who everybody trusts, to order unnecessary tests and to prescribe and perform sub-optimum treatments and procedures.
I'm not sure if that was the part you wanted me to enjoy but it was worth the 5 minutes to glean that information.
To bring this slightly back on topic, it seems to me that the same problem with bad info being conveyed in school applies in climate science and that climate scientists are equally as slow as Doctors to abandon this information even as it is proven wrong. For example, CO2 concentrations are steadily rising. The AGW hypothesis suggests that tempuratures should be rising too but they have mostly been flat.
He actually goes into great
He actually goes into great detail about how certain things that physicians do routinely have been proven to have absolutely no benefit, or actually be harmful (I think he focuses on mammograms and ACLS in his talk; his book goes into various other things). His first example (I can't remember off the top of my head what it is... I think it has to do with alcohol and breast cancer) goes into detail looking at the studies and how the results of the study have been twisted by both physicians (with an agenda) and the popular media, and how we need to increase our literature literacy, so to speak. If you're into history, the first 10 minutes or so of his presentation (after the introductions) goes into detail about George Washington's death.
If you have the time, I do recommend watching the whole thing. It was one of the best attended lectures given at my school, with nearly 200 people in the audience. And every single person I talked to afterward said that they loved it, even those who didn't entirely agree with his conclusions.
So yeah, moral of the story is that people skew experimental results, or misrepresent them, at least, to serve their own agenda. I suspect it's not something unique to medicine.