Evolution

a good part of many males "downfall' is the fact that our senses are so dumbed down. we have replaced olfactory, auditory, even visual senses with the powers of our cognitive process.

http://www.progressiveu.org/020648-why-i-cant-write-about-a-platypus#com...

http://www.progressiveu.org/043458-ps-i-sincerely-apologize-all-platypus...

I would like to begin by pointing out that the inspiration for this in-depth look at the platypus was inspired by the blogs linked above.

Haven't you always wondered why you yawn? What it was? Why it always seemed to happen right before you went to sleep, and sometimes when you awoke? Why is was seemingly involuntary? Why other primates used it as to communicate? I have.

It seems the platypus really is God’s little joke.

DNA studies recently found out that the reason the widely-agreed-to-be-mammalian-platypus exhibits characteristics of mammals, birds, and reptiles is, no joke, platypus have DNA structures of mammals, birds, and reptiles.

Much has been debated in the scientific world and without as well about the origin of species, or evolution. However, people on both the proposing and opposing side of the issue really do not know exactly what evolution is. This sad fact has resulted in endless debates between people so fully entrenched in their beliefs that such debate is really just fancy arguing.

Ben Stein's new movie got me thinking about the whole evolution and creationism debate and public schools. Personally, I am a Christian but I do believe in evolution, which is more common than a lot of people would have you think. As for intelligent design, I suppose I actually do believe in it, as I think that it was God's intention for humans to evolve as we did.

In my opinion, the evolutionists presented a very silly, shallow argument. They were arguing that evolution should be taught solely, without any teaching about other theories. In this way, they were really arguing that only their way of thinking should be taught. This is not a principle that this nation was built on.

An analysis of the article, “Biologist and Believer – correcting muddled thinking,” by Andrew Szebenyi: