In my opinion, the evolutionists presented a very silly, shallow argument. They were arguing that evolution should be taught solely, without any teaching about other theories. In this way, they were really arguing that only their way of thinking should be taught. This is not a principle that this nation was built on.
darwin
Evolution debate - "Intelligent Design on Trial" [part two - my opinion]
By all4Him - Posted on April 16th, 2008
(1 vote)
Evolution debate - "Intelligent Design on Trial" [part one - article summary]
By all4Him - Posted on April 16th, 2008
“Intelligent Design on Trial” by Larry Witham
This article is about the court trial between an evolutionist and the rulings of a school board to allow Supreme Design to be mentioned in class when evolution is being taught.
No votes yet
Evolution debate - Biologist and Believer, does one really have a greater arguement?
By all4Him - Posted on April 16th, 2008
Tagged: Constitution
• Creationism
• darwin
• Evolution
• natural selection
• school systems
• theory
An analysis of the article, “Biologist and Believer – correcting muddled thinking,” by Andrew Szebenyi:
No votes yet

God Vs. ...?
By robin_15698 - Posted on March 11th, 2008
Tagged: belief
• darwin
• Devil
• Faith
• gay
• God
• life
• questions
• Religion
• thought
• Worship
• Broad prosperity
• Personal freedom
A Few questions I have thought of, and also been asked:
* “If we evolved from monkeys, why are their still monkeys?
Because, if every animal died after it evolved into a new creature, their would only be a few animals alive. Monkeys (particualiry Chimps) evolved as well...therefore, we both have evolved from similar creatures, that is why we are similar.
No votes yet



