peppermintfrost's blog

peppermintfrost's picture

Steroids: Do the benefits outweigh the risks?

Tagged:  •    •  

I personally would never use steroids for 2 reasons: 1. The multiple health risks. 2. The guilt. 

I wouldn't want to cause that much harm to my body just for the sake of winning a major sporting event, like the Olympics for example.  Also, even in the case that I did win due to steroids, I would never feel proud of my accomplishments because I would always know that it was the drugs empowering me; not my own strength.  Read More »

peppermintfrost's picture

Google vs. U.S. Government

Tagged:  •  

I commend Google for standing its ground and not releasing its search queries up to the government.   AOL, Yahoo, and Microsoft quickly released this info without any thought.  The government wants these searches so that they can see if porn comes up when searching for some normal word or phrase. 

I feel that this is a violation of civil rights even though we are in a time of war.  Sure, the government claims that they do not need names, yet they did acknowledge that if they found any suspicious information then they would need to know whose search it was.  What if someone was searching about Hamas just to try to further their knowledge about the world around them?  Then maybe the government would consider that a suspicious search.   Read More »

peppermintfrost's picture

Abortion: A Constitutional right or homicide?

Tagged:

I am a Pro-Life supporter.  Abortion is murder under any and all circumstances.  Why should a mother have the "right" to kill her child?  She can murder her baby legally while it's in her womb, but the moment it is born, then that would be considered a crime.  Murder is the intentional killing of a human being . A fetus is a human and abortion is an intentional killing, which means that nobody can refute the fact that abortion is murder.  Read More »

peppermintfrost's picture

Denmark Cartoonists: Utilizing Freedom of the Press or Simply Ignorant?

     Portraying the Muslim prophet, Mohammed, in any visual form is highly sacreligous for any Muslim person.  1/5 of the entire world's population is Muslim.  Did the Denmark newspaper that published cartoons featuring Mohammed to be associated with terrorism know any of this?  I feel that they did and were just trying to prove a point of freedom of the press at the expense of every Muslim in the world.  Read More »

Syndicate content