In my opinion, the evolutionists presented a very silly, shallow argument. They were arguing that evolution should be taught solely, without any teaching about other theories. In this way, they were really arguing that only their way of thinking should be taught. This is not a principle that this nation was built on.
all4Him's blog
Evolution debate - "Intelligent Design on Trial" [part two - my opinion]
By all4Him - Posted on April 16th, 2008
Evolution debate - "Intelligent Design on Trial" [part one - article summary]
By all4Him - Posted on April 16th, 2008
“Intelligent Design on Trial” by Larry Witham
This article is about the court trial between an evolutionist and the rulings of a school board to allow Supreme Design to be mentioned in class when evolution is being taught.
Evolution debate - Biologist and Believer, does one really have a greater arguement?
By all4Him - Posted on April 16th, 2008
Tagged: Constitution
• Creationism
• darwin
• Evolution
• natural selection
• school systems
• theory
An analysis of the article, “Biologist and Believer – correcting muddled thinking,” by Andrew Szebenyi:
Pure Love - Does it exist anymore?
By all4Him - Posted on April 15th, 2008
Tagged: barriers
• boxes
• forgiveness
• God
• happiness
• hate
• inadequate
• Justice
• life
• love
• peace
• powerful
• protection
• pure love
• safety
• sanctity
• True Love
• truth
• Personal freedom
Even in our world that seems so full of hate, violence, mistrust, shame, and abuse, I would wholeheartedly argue that true love still exists and is all around us.






