F#@$ God! And religion (EDITED)

God is nothing but bullcrap. Where is physical proof that hes real. I'm not gunna lie... i think religion is bullcrap period. Whats the point in religion? Religion was probably created by people who could be in power and rule so they decided to make up some bullcrap religion. Got a bunch of people believing in what they were saying and shit just kept coming out and more and more people started believing in it. So therefor, people who were not good enough to rule a country, or a state, or even a county, would become a preist or something just so they could feel like they had power. So people would listen to what they had to say. Religion is 100% bullcrap, and people who are part of a religion cough(catholics)cough think that just because they go to church and god forgives them of all there sins that they can do whatever the heck they want. They can be as rude as they want, they can do whatever they want..... Why? Oh because god forgives them.... Just to make it clear im not talking about all catholics... just most of them....... Pure 100% BULLCRAP Please tell me people agree!

bridge's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

...I must say Mr. F---god666*, that you raise a point that a number of people have raised before. Some people don't use such coarse language to do so, but hey, everybody's got an opinion.

Some people are atheists. Some are not. It's an opinion thing.

You could say that God is supposed to be good, and then bad things happen in the world anyway, to the very people who pray to him, so then there can't possibly be a God.

But it's still just an opinion and point of view deal. The world's a little more interesting with differing opinions in it.

*this comment was written prior to the name change.

brit62988's picture

I agree that it is very much an opinion thing- but also how you were raised and what you consider important in your life.

To Fuckgod666, I also agree with you. I don't believe in the God that everybody else gives so much credit to. However, I know that when I look at the sky and the beautiful interaction of everything in life (aka: the big picture) I know that we all didn't evolve from apes. Something amazing has got to be out there that created this beautiful place. But whether or not it is an all-knowing "god", I'm not to sure about that one.
Why wouldn't he just give us proof he is here?? So that we could all go to heaven- that would solve all problems. Then people could debate about whether or not he cares or whatever, but we would all have the option to really "go to heaven" or not.

darwins beagle's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

... and I've taken someone whose views I probably agree with to task for making unwarranted statements, I might as well respond to something I fully disagree with.

brit62988 wrote:

... However, I know that when I look at the sky and the beautiful interaction of everything in life (aka: the big picture) I know that we all didn't evolve from apes.

Speaking of the sky; in less than a week it will be the 1 year anniversary of Hurricane Ike.

It was the third most destructive storm in US history. I went through it. The sky wasn't so beautiful that day. It left me without a place to work for 4 months. It put a big strain on my family's life one we are still recovering from. But ... there was a bunch of beautiful interactions that went into causing it.

The Gulf waters were warm. What makes warm things warm is not that their molecules are hot. It is that their molecules are moving very fast. The faster the molecules in water move the more likely they are to escape the surface. That is evaporation. The escaped molecules are called water vapor.

Water is made up of two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen. The molecular weight of water is 18. 80% of air is nitrogen molecules which are two nitrogen atoms bound together. The molecular weight of a nitrogen molecule is 28. For every water molecule that enters the air it displaces a molecule of air, most likely a nitrogen molecule. Thus, when waters enter the air there is a gain in molecular weight of 18 but a loss in molecular weight of 28. Thus, air saturated with water will weigh less than will dry air. That is what causes the low pressure found in hurricanes.

The fast moving atoms tend to rise. As they rise the atoms coalesce. That is condensation. When they coalesce they move less so they are cooler. Since energy is conserved, when water vapor condenses and cools energy is release energy. This is called the latent heat of condensation. This energy causes winds.

The winds distribute the rising water vapor over an area (in the case of Ike) of a thousand miles in diameter. The cooling condensed water falls near the center ensuring that the most intense winds will occur in the eye wall. This forms a stable structure ... the hurricane.

Where the hurricane goes is determined by the upper-level winds associated with the surrounding areas of high pressure. As the storm moves the winds push up waters in front of the storm. These are the storm surges. In Ike the storm surge was 25 feet. That is the sea in front of the storm within the eye wall was 25 feet higher than normal.

As the storm approaches land the storm surge can be devastating. It was in Ike. Some Texas Gulf-coast communities will never recover.

The point of all of that is that for Ike to occur required a lot of interaction involving several parts of the earth's biosphere. Even though its effect can be devastating, an understanding of the interactions can be awe-inspiring. But the thing is ... NONE of it requires the interaction of a supernatural being. Nobody but a few ultra-religious wackaloons believes that hurricanes are a part of God's plans to punish people anymore. Their is a realization that because nature is the way it is, hurricanes are going to form ... no God needed.

The same goes for the beautiful days as well. Because nature is as it is, there are going to be good days ... no God needed. So looking at the sky doesn't give you any real evidence that God exists.

But suppose it did ... would that mean that humans didn't evolve from ape-like ancestors? The connection between the beauties of the sky and human evolution are quite tenuous. To find out it would be better to look at the evidence.

Here are some fossil skulls. The skull labelled A is a modern chimpanzee's. The skull labelled N is a modern human. The ones in-between are arranged in order of chronology. The oldest fossil is B and they get younger as they approach N.

In this sequence, where do ape fossils end and human fossils begin?
What criteria did you use to come up with your answer?
If you couldn't come up with an answer, then why doesn't this represent an excellent fossil transition between apes and humans?

But let's not stop there ... Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes. Chimps, Gorillas and Orangutans have 24 pairs. If humans shared a common ancestor with the other apes then they must have had Robertsonian fusion in which two chromosomes fused together to form one. And evidence of that should be found when we look at homologous choromosomes.

Here is human chromosome #2. The G-banding pattern shows quite clearly that it is homologous to two chimp, two gorilla and two orangutan chromosomes.

But let's not even stop there ... Humans do not make their own Vitamin C. Neither do any of the apes. BUT we have the genetic machinery to do so. The problem is that the gene for the last enzyme in the pathway, gulono-lactose oxidase (GLO), has a mutation that deactivates the gene. It turns out that chimps, gorillas, and organutans have exactly the same mutation. The only reasonable explanation is that the mutation occurred in an ancestor prior to the split that led to the different species.

I could give more evidence, but for a reasonable person, it should be enough to convince that humans DID evolve from a common ancestor as the other apes.

Cheers,

DB

===
If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. - Anatole France

I do think that there is proof of an Almighty God, you just need to know where to look for it. From the way every little thing on this earth has a place and a purpose (whether we know it or not) to the people who ask God for a miraculous cure and receive it (I have witnessed this many times) . All it takes is the willingness to look for the proof and the faith to believe that you will someday find it. Try getting quiet and listening to that little voice inside, or just have a conversation with him and be open to any way he might try to respond to you: again that calm inner voice that most people don't realize can be God, visual images such as daydreams or pictures in your head (sounds kinda crazy but just be open and let go of previous thoughts about the matter) , or even just remembering something someone may have said to you long ago, something that you shouldn't remember or have no reason to be thinking about it.

I think a lot of people forget that God is not the only force working to effect our lives. Anyone who has read the bible knows that there is also an evil force trying to kill, steal, and destroy humankind's blessings and happiness, and quite honestly I think that the people who believe that bad things happen because God is punishing people are misguided. In response to someone else who also responded to your comment, I do not know the spiritual reasons for natural disasters, but I do know that God sees us as more than just the physical beings we are today. He looks at each one of us and sees our spiritual journey. For some people they may not choose God in their natural lifetime but He gives all of us multiple chances to accept Him as our God.

Sorry that was so long but I hope that helps. If you do one day choose to believe in God just know that there will always be things that will try to make you doubt, but even if you can't see the proof with your eyes, God is still there speaking to you and guiding you though your life.

darwins beagle's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association
sky9jessie wrote:

I do think that there is proof of an Almighty God, you just need to know where to look for it. From the way every little thing on this earth has a place and a purpose (whether we know it or not) to the people who ask God for a miraculous cure and receive it (I have witnessed this many times) . All it takes is the willingness to look for the proof and the faith to believe that you will someday find it. Try getting quiet and listening to that little voice inside, or just have a conversation with him and be open to any way he might try to respond to you: again that calm inner voice that most people don't realize can be God, visual images such as daydreams or pictures in your head (sounds kinda crazy but just be open and let go of previous thoughts about the matter) , or even just remembering something someone may have said to you long ago, something that you shouldn't remember or have no reason to be thinking about it.

(1) You start off nicely. The evidence for God is that everything has a purpose. That something that we can investigate. But then you totally screw it up. You add "whether we know it or not". What this boils down to is ... the evidence of God's existence is that everything has a purpose even if we can't detect it. Sorry but that changes your "evidence" to nothing more than a mere assertion.

(2) Science has investigated intecessory prayer. It doesn't work. You can cite all the cases you want, but they will pale in comparison to the people who prayed and it didn't work. Furthermore all those cases in which people report miraculous cures seem to come to people who received medical care, had controversial diagnoses in the first place, or had diseases that are known to occasionally cure on their own. Why is it that God never seems to grow back an amputated limb?

(3) When one tries "getting quiet and listening to that little voice inside, or just have a conversation with him and be open to any way he might try to respond" one is setting up the perfect situation in which to fool oneself. It is such an easy thing to do. Why is that God talks to us in a way that perfectly mimics one own inner thoughts intruding into consciousness? Furthermore, if it is God and since so many people do exactly what you suggest, why isn't God telling them all the same (or at least consistent) things? One person's revelation can directly contradict anothers. To me that sounds exactly what we would expect if the revelation is coming from inside the person and not from the outside.

s9j wrote:

I think a lot of people forget that God is not the only force working to effect our lives. Anyone who has read the bible knows that there is also an evil force trying to kill, steal, and destroy humankind's blessings and happiness, and quite honestly I think that the people who believe that bad things happen because God is punishing people are misguided. In response to someone else who also responded to your comment, I do not know the spiritual reasons for natural disasters, but I do know that God sees us as more than just the physical beings we are today. He looks at each one of us and sees our spiritual journey. For some people they may not choose God in their natural lifetime but He gives all of us multiple chances to accept Him as our God.

Anybody who has read the bible SHOULD realize that it contains a number of things that simply are not true. Included in that is "an evil force trying to kill, steal, and destroy humankind's blessing and happiness". It makes no sense.

(1) Why would an all-powerful God allow such foolishness? Just think about what it says of a God. God is no better than an extortionist who demands "protection money" or else his gang will do harm to you. God demands your worship or else he will allow his "fallen angels" to hurt you.

(2) Why would the "evil force" do that? Its not like having more people in hell is going to increase its chance of killing God. Is it doing it just to tick off a God who could prevent it but doesn't? I would hope that the supernatural realm wouldn't be such a petty place.

You cannot KNOW what you claim ... "that God sees us as more than just the physical beings we are today. He looks at each one of us and sees our spiritual journey" ... simply because you don't KNOW that God exists. You may believe it; you may be convinced of it; but you don't KNOW it.

I think you would be very hard pressed to find anyone who disbelieves in the existence of Barack Obama. But there are millions of people who don't believe God exists. If God truly wanted people to believe in him then he could do it easily ... the same way Barack Obama has convinced people of it. All he has to do is show himself. But he doesn't do that, does he? Why not? Please don't say that by doing so would somehow violate my free-will. I find that answer so stupid as to be insulting. If God were to show himself and say that what we humans should do is dip our babies' feet in boiling oil because the screams are great to hear, I might believe in his existence, but I wouldn't believe in his goodness. I still have my free-will.

s9j wrote:

Sorry that was so long but I hope that helps. If you do one day choose to believe in God just know that there will always be things that will try to make you doubt, but even if you can't see the proof with your eyes, God is still there speaking to you and guiding you though your life.

Sorry, but the evidence doesn't support that assertion. If you ever decide to look at the world giving the possibility that God doesn't exist a serious consideration, perhaps you would realize that. If you do, I also hope you realize that nothing has really changed. God wasn't there before and he's not there now. Love of family and friends was there before; it still here. It was a good thing to treat people with integrity and respect before; it is still a good thing. It was a good thing to live your life by principle before; it is a good thing now.

Cheers,

DB
===
If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. - Anatole France

I might not have explained myself very well but the points you make is exactly what i mean.

Your lover will love you even more if you get them a pinata

darwins beagle's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association
Fuckgod666 wrote:

God is nothing but bullshit. ...

Since I strongly believe there is no God, I would whole-heartedly agree with you if you left the statement at "God is nothing"

Fg666 wrote:

... Where is physical proof that hes real. ...

There isn't any.

Fg666 wrote:

I'm not gunna lie... i think religion is bullshit period. ...

Well, perhaps the rational justification for it is.

Fg666 wrote:

... Whats the point in religion? ...

You ask that as though there were only one point. Religion is a big phenomenon. Most of the people in the world are religious. Religions vary. It would be very surprising if one point could possibly sum it up.

For some people religion is a way of coping with stress and tragedies in their lives. If some of the horrible things that happen to them and their loved ones has a purpose ... even one that they can't understand ... then it makes living through it tolerable.

For some people religion is a sense of community and fellowship. They meet with like people who share a common interest.

For some people religion is a tradition. Their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents etc. believed and they believe as well.

For some people religion is a way of seeing morality in the world. They believe that their sacred texts do have some relationship with what a supreme being wants them to do with their life.

For some people religion is a way of making money and/or accumulating power. They realize that the institution can be used to influence others to do what they want them to.

For some people religion is a combination of the above.

Fg666 wrote:

... Religion was probably created by people who could be in power and rule so they decided to make up some bullshit religion. ...

Religion was "created" a long time ago.

This is the Venus of Willendorf. It is thought to be a symbol for a fertility goddess. It dates back to 22,000 BCE.

This is the Goddess of Lausell. Notice how much it looks like the Venus of Willendorf. The Goddess of Lausell dates back between 30,000 and 20,000 BCE

This the Venus of Hohle Fels. Notice the similarities to the others. It dates back to 33,000 BCE.

Fertility goddesses like these are among the earliest human artworks known. They span almost 10,000 years or more. If the resemblances are do represent a common fertility goddess then it would have been the longest lasting religion in human history. The fact that it was a fertility goddess suggests that religion was created in response to concerns over sex and child birth.

Fg666 wrote:

... Got a bunch of people believing in what they were saying and shit just kept coming out and more and more people started believing in it. ...

The evidence suggests that there has always been a lot of people believing religious claims. Hopefully we are at a time where people believe it less and less. The United States is a very religious country with over 80% believers, but in other countries (especially European countries) that figure is much lower. I would like to believe that with the scientific knowledge we have today the world is gradually becoming more rational.

Fg666 wrote:

... So therefor, people who were not good enough to rule a country, or a state, or even a county, would become a preist or something just so they could feel like they had power. So people would listen to what they had to say. ...

During the Medieval times European countries often had joint rule. They had kings and they had priests. Sometimes kings were more powerful; sometimes priests were. But governments and religion has often gone hand-in-hand. The result of that has very often been a VERY bad thing. In Europe theocracies (government dominated by religious dogma) were responsible for the Inquisition and the Witch trials. Today Muslim countries seem to have the most dangerous theocracies (Iran and Afghanistan with Iraq, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia under pressure to become an Islamic republics).

Fg666 wrote:

Religion is 100% bullshit, and people who are part of a religion cough(catholics)cough think that just because they go to church and god forgives them of all there sins that they can do whatever the fuck they want. ...

Catholicism claims to go back to Jesus' disciple Peter (who is claimed to be the first pope). Critical scholarship does not support this. The church was formalized 300 years after the supposed time of Jesus, under the Emperor Constantine. That church eventually became the Catholic Church.

If you are interested in exactly what the officially sanction "code of conduct" is for the Catholic Church then it can be found here. However, I suspect that what you are complaining about is less likely to be about the official church position and more likely to be about the conduct of individual Catholics. If that is so then it is a bit unfair to tar 1 billion plus Catholics for the actions of an obnoxious minority.

The leadership of the Catholic Church can certainly be faulted for a lot of things (its conduct in sexual abuse by priests scandal, its die-hard opposition to condom use in AIDS-torn Africa, etc). The catechism (see link above) is full of historically constrained prescribed and proscribed behaviors that I find faulty as well. But the rank and file Catholics for the most part do not follow the most heinous ones. For instance, in Latin America birth control usage is almost the same level as it is in the United States, a country not dominated by Catholics.

Fg666 wrote:

... They can be as rude as they want, they can do whatever they want.....

LOL, you have just told religious people that their most heartfelt belief is bullshit. You have accused priests of being failed kings. You have accused religion as being made up to control people. You have done all that without showing the slightest evidence that you have put any effort into understanding religion, its origin, or its present practice. ... Given that, don't you think your accusation that Catholics are rude could set off some irony meters in the house?

Fg666 wrote:

... Why? Oh because god forgives them....... Pure 100% BULLSHIT Please tell me people agree!

A lot of religion is bullshit. Certainly I think there is enough bullshit in it that the world could be better off without it. But before you label all of it bullshit you might want to look at it a little more objectively.

Cheers,

DB
===
If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. - Anatole France

bridge's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

Ugh. I hate it when this happens. I had this whole reply typed out and sounding semi-intelligent, and then the page wouldn't load and I lost it. *shakes head sadly*. I'll try to say some of it again.

The first comment was "I love your blogs/comments" because you always put so much thought and detail in them. Nobody could say you're not doing your homework.

Then I mentioned I'm one of those wackadoos who believes in both science and religion. I believe in evolution (hey c'mon, you can't say there isn't evidence of this). But I also believe in God, even though I don't blindly accept what any one religion force feeds me. I think every religion, or most, have some version of the truth.

One majoy problem with such an old institution as religion is that things change and adapt to the times. Sometimes a particular King will change the Bible to the way he wants it read, or when the Bible is translated into another language, it loses some of its meaning. You can't say there's gotta be some flaws with that system.

Oh, also, that fertility goddess similarity was really interesting. There's a similarity between many ancienct cultures all over the world with symbols like this, including one of a flying ship of some sort. But that's fodder for another argument in another day.

chillbill's picture

or at least it did a few versions ago when I last used it.

"I had this whole reply typed out and sounding semi-intelligent, and then the page wouldn't load and I lost it."

In Firefox you can just hit 'back' when the page fails to load, and everything you typed will reappear.

"It is only by risking our persons from one hour to another that we live at all. And often enough our faith beforehand in an uncertified result is the only thing that makes the result come true."
- William James

bridge's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

I used to have Firefox but somehow I locked myself out of it. When I try to get into it, it just shows a blank white page and doesn't go to any other pages. I'm still wondering how I managed to do that...

chillbill's picture

"But governments and religion has often gone hand-in-hand. The result of that has very often been a VERY bad thing."

...even when that state sponsored religious belief happened to be Atheism.

"It is only by risking our persons from one hour to another that we live at all. And often enough our faith beforehand in an uncertified result is the only thing that makes the result come true."
- William James

darwins beagle's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

(1) Atheism is no more of a religion than NOT collecting stamps is a hobby.

(2) Governments are based on enforceable laws that prescribe acceptable conduct of the governed. Atheism is the belief that no gods exist. Atheism doesn't say how one should act. Thus, you CAN'T possibly have a government based on atheism. It would be equivalent to having a government based on the belief that cherry pie tastes good.

Theocracies believe that their God prescribes proper conduct and base their laws on what they perceive that conduct to be. That is the problem. The governments that you are claiming are based on "the state sponsored religious belief ... [of] Atheism" derived their rules of conduct not from atheism (it has no prescribed code of conduct) but from communism. Communism has its unquestioned dogma, same as religion does, and it certainly can be a big problem. While it is true that communism includes atheism, it does not derive its code of conduct from atheism (again that would be impossible).This may surprise you ... but I know a lot of atheists. To my knowledge I do not personally know a single communist. Atheism can exist perfectly fine without being tied to communism.

The best governments are secular governments in which religious dogma (and religious-like dogma) are not part of government. In our country we call that separation of church and state. I think it is very important to keep it that way.

===
If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. - Anatole France

chillbill's picture

"(1) Atheism is no more of a religion than NOT collecting stamps is a hobby."

That is a cute one...again, but as long as you make a career of going into detail about the stamps you don't collect, and try tirelessly to convince others to also not collect them.

You have a hobby.

---
"The best governments are secular governments in which religious dogma (and religious-like dogma) are not part of government. In our country we call that separation of church and state. I think it is very important to keep it that way."

We agree on that, and I would go further in qualifying that The BEST governments are those that are not allowed to place ANY restriction on free thought, belief, or expression.

"It is only by risking our persons from one hour to another that we live at all. And often enough our faith beforehand in an uncertified result is the only thing that makes the result come true."
- William James

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association
Quote:

That is a cute one...again, but as long as you make a career of going into detail about the stamps you don't collect, and try tirelessly to convince others to also not collect them.

A more cogent comparison would be if you were just sitting at home and minding your own business, and every day there were multiple knocks on your door with salesmen trying to convince you to buy their stamps. After a few thousand such pitches, you would probably know a good bit about stamps (even though you don't collect them, yourself), and would probably have become pretty good at explaining to each day's new crop of salesmen why you don't want to buy their stamps.

TTFN,
Blackout
---
What is a "Real American?"
---
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the ProU community.

darwins beagle's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association
chillbill wrote:

"(1) Atheism is no more of a religion than NOT collecting stamps is a hobby."

That is a cute one...again, but as long as you make a career of going into detail about the stamps you don't collect, and try tirelessly to convince others to also not collect them.

You have a hobby.

Except the hobby wouldn't be "not collecting stamps", the hobby would be ADVOCATING against collecting stamps.

This would seem to imply that what you see all advocation as religion, especially impassioned advocation. I would disagree.

chillbill wrote:

"The best governments are secular governments in which religious dogma (and religious-like dogma) are not part government. In our country we call that separation of church and state. I think it is very important to keep it that way."

We agree on that, and I would go further in qualifying that The BEST governments are those that are not allowed to place ANY restriction on free thought, belief, or expression.

For the most part that is true. Only in extreme cases is it wrong. For instance people should not be allowed free expression to shout FIRE in a croweded theater without cause. People should not be allowed free expression to knowingly lie in order to advance their agenda. People should not be allowed free expression of their religious beliefs when those beliefs go against the best interests of a minor in their care as in the case of Daniel Hauser".

DB

===
If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. - Anatole France

mvenus929's picture
Managing Director of Progressive U

Congratulations. You've convinced me that I've been blind. I now see the light!

At least DB and Blackout make some interesting arguments when they fight against religion.

~C
Check out the latest entry in the Between The Lines column!
Want the highest rated list to change? RATE those blogs, then!

chillbill's picture

"Where is physical proof that hes real.(?)"

Since, by definition, God created the PHYSICAL world itself, everything that physically exists is the proof you seek.

This is not proof of any specific attribute that man has assigned to God, just proof that 'he' is real.

"It is only by risking our persons from one hour to another that we live at all. And often enough our faith beforehand in an uncertified result is the only thing that makes the result come true."
- William James

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association
Quote:

Since, by definition, God created the PHYSICAL world itself, everything that physically exists is the proof you seek.

This is a logical fallacy. You are presenting a circular argument that defies all reason. Also, the existence of REAL objects and phenomena are not proved through arbitrary definition. They are rather defined by describing their oberservable qualities. Honestly, you should know better by now.

TTFN,
Blackout
---
What is a "Real American?"
---
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the ProU community.

chillbill's picture

A definition could contain a logical inference or statement, but since this one does not your repetitive blather is once again an irrelevant null.

"It is only by risking our persons from one hour to another that we live at all. And often enough our faith beforehand in an uncertified result is the only thing that makes the result come true."
- William James

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

Your entire argument relies on one of the most basic logical fallacies. Logic is defined as "The formal systematic study of the principles of valid inference and correct reasoning." (LINK) Thus, your argument cannot be considred logical, since by defintion it violates the rules of logic by employing the fallacy of begging the question.

The simple fact is that you have been challenged MANY TIMES to provide even ONE example of a bit of acutal, objective evidence that would justify your conclusion that "god exists." And in EVERY itereation of that challenged, you have failed to provide that evidence.

And so, I will issue that challenge to you, again.

Can you provide even ONE bit of actual, objective evidence that would suggest that the supposed supernatural being your refer to as "God" really exists?

TTFN,
Blackout
---
What is a "Real American?"
---
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the ProU community.

chillbill's picture

"Can you provide even ONE bit of actual, objective evidence that would suggest that the supposed supernatural being your refer to as "God" really exists?"

No 'supernatural' things of any type exist.
--------------------------------------------------------
There is a real God.

If you can either accept my definition of that God, or provide a definition of a REAL God your self, and...

Since you do not accept the classic definition of evidence (normally that definition includes eyewitness testimony) provide your alternate meaning for that word as well...

Then I will once again venture to explain harmony to the spiritually tone deaf.

"It is only by risking our persons from one hour to another that we live at all. And often enough our faith beforehand in an uncertified result is the only thing that makes the result come true."
- William James

darwins beagle's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association
chillbill wrote:

Since you do not accept the classic definition of evidence (normally that definition includes eyewitness testimony) ...

So tell me, what does God look like?

DB
===
If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. - Anatole France

sawaboof's picture
darwins beagle's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

Matthew 18:3 And he said: "I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

Now I know why,

DB

===
If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. - Anatole France

chillbill's picture

...and everything else you can see, as well as all that you cannot see.

"It is only by risking our persons from one hour to another that we live at all. And often enough our faith beforehand in an uncertified result is the only thing that makes the result come true."
- William James

darwins beagle's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

... you could be seeing anything ... or nothing. Then you have given me exactly zero information. I know absolutely nothing more from your having told me that.

That's why we can rule out YOUR eyewitness testimony.

DB

===
If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing. - Anatole France

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

...and have failed to provide any actual, objective evidence to support your claim. Typical.

Quote:

Since you do not accept the classic definition of evidence (normally that definition includes eyewitness testimony) provide your alternate meaning for that word as well...

Testimony is only considered evidence in the legal sense of the word. Objective scientists do not accept testimony as evidence. Of course, even in court, testimony is subject to being questioned and substantiated. The witness must be credible, and the events he or she accounts must be regarding the first had experience of the witness.

In a more general, philosphical sense...

We can also, rationally accept a claim on the basis of another persons testimony unless (1. the claim is implausible; 2. The person or the source in which the claim is quoted lacks credibility; 3. The claim goes beyond what the person could know from his or her own experience and competence.)

Your claims are certainly implausible, and we know from your time here that you personally lack credibility. Your claims are speculative, at best, and cannot be substantiated. That makes your "testimony" suspect.

You lose again.

TTFN,
Blackout
---
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the ProU community.

chillbill's picture

Although it is plain that you think it is since you try so hard to cheat.

So you will not define evidence? I would note that based upon the quoted portion alone you will never find any testimony that disagrees with your presupposed notions 'credible.'

Also you failed to either accept my definition of God or provide your own. Will you choose one or the other or provide your 'logic' for how ANY word left undefined can have any proof, evidence or even meaning?
---
"Objective scientists do not accept testimony as evidence."

Would you say that clinical trials, of drugs on human subjects, are EVER conducted by Objective scientists?

"It is only by risking our persons from one hour to another that we live at all. And often enough our faith beforehand in an uncertified result is the only thing that makes the result come true."
- William James

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

If you wanted a defintion of evidence, you should have asked...

Evidence in its broadest sense includes everything that is used to determine or demonstrate the truth of an assertion. Giving or procuring evidence is the process of using those things that are either a) presumed to be true, or b) were themselves proven via evidence, to demonstrate an assertion's truth. Evidence is the currency by which one fulfills the burden of proof.

In your presentation of your argument, you keep making assertions, but you don't give us anything to actually show us that those assertions are true. That is why your arguments fail.

The point I was making to you, however, was that the form of evidence known as testimony is only applicable to evidence as it is presented in a court of law. Testimony is NOT, however, applicable when making a objective assertion of existence for an alleged object (or in this case, being). You attempt here is just one more dishonest use of the same shell game tactic of playing fast and loose (and inconsistently) with defintions.

As for the term "God" (capitalized as you use it), I like this defintion....

God is a deity in theistic and deistic religions and other belief systems, representing either the sole deity in monotheism, or a principal deity in polytheism.

God is most often conceived of as the supernatural creator and overseer of the universe.

And finally, your lack of crediblity is your own fault. When some is caught lying in an internet forum, it is unlikely that other in that forum will in the future accept your statements at face value. You made your own bed in that regard, and now you have to lay in it.

The burden of proof here lies with you. If you have actual, objective evidence that "God" exists, provide it to us now. Othewise, please don't waste our time with any more of your illogical clap-trap.

TTFN,
Blackout
---
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the ProU community.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.