Anne Rice used to write about vampires and witches. My favorite book of hers is "Memnoch The Devil." it doesn't read like a story. More like the Bhagavad Gita http://www.bhagavad-gita.us/articles/660/1/Introduction-to-Bhagavad-Gita...
From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memnoch_the_Devil
"Lestat meets the Devil, who calls himself "Memnoch." He takes Lestat on a whirlwind tour of Heaven, Hell and the main epochs in the evolution of the universe. The tour offers a retelling of the entirety of Biblical history from the devil's point of view, in an effort, by Memnoch, to convince Lestat to join him in a noble quest. In his journey, Memnoch claims he is not evil, but merely working for God by ushering lost souls into Heaven. Lestat is left in confusion, unable to decide whether or not to cast his lot with the Devil...
....After the tour, Lestat believes himself to have had a major revelation. Among other things, he believes that he has seen Christ's crucifixion and that he has received Saint Veronica's Veil. He has also lost an eye in Hell. He tells his story to Armand, David Talbot and Dora, who have joined him in New York. Dora and Armand are deeply affected upon seeing the veil. Dora takes it and reveals it to the world and Armand goes into the sun and immolates himself in order to convince people that a miracle has occurred.
At the end of the novel, Lestat and David go to New Orleans. There, Maharet returns Lestat's eye to him, along with a note from Memnoch. This note reveals that Memnoch may have been manipulating Lestat to serve his own agenda. Lestat then loses control of himself and Maharet is forced to chain him in the basement of the St. Elizabeth's convent, which is owned by the vampires, so that he will not hurt himself or others. When he is at last released, Lestat enters a prolonged coma on the floor of St. Elizabeth's (in which he remains for the next installment of the Vampire Chronicles).
Although the novel fits in the The Vampire Chronicles storyline, the vast majority of it consists of the "tour" Memnoch gives Lestat of Heaven, Hell and of the cosmology and theology behind it all.
The novel follows up on claims made by David Talbot in The Tale of the Body Thief that God and the Devil are on better terms than most Christians believe. It also reinterprets biblical stories to create a complete history of Earth, Heaven and Hell that fit neatly with the history of vampires given in The Queen of the Damned."
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now, even though this summarizes a very busy plot, most of the book *is* the tour, and it reads poetically, almost philosophically.
On the mystical level, it is profound. My favorite part is where Memnoch takes Lestat to the crucifixion of Jesus (they are able to travel through time, obviously) and lestat feeds on Jesus' blood, and Jesus lets him do this. It is a very profound moment for Lestat, a vampire, who drinks more than blood when he feeds on people, he drinks their soul...
Now this kind of imagery is horrifying to a Christian. Beyond blasphemy, just total,, utter evil. Anne Rice has also written her own version of a gnostic Gospel about Jesus' childhood, which is profound, because the Bible as we know it only covers his infancy and the last 3 years of his life,,,there is a whole lot in between all of that, and Christians especially would benefit from realizing that. Again, to even consider this is blasphemy, which is why Anne Rice has had to commit herself to disguising her own spiritual revelations as science fiction and fantasy. Otherwise, i am sure she would have been assassinated by now, like so many other prophets. Funny, how most Christians preach Christ's love for us, that we are supposed to love him back, but we are not to look any further than the Bible for information on this man we are supposed to give our souls to. "To add to or take away from" their book is a terrible son. We are not supposed to even desire to fill in the gaps with our own faith and understanding.
Anne Rice has officially come back into her Catholic faith, the faith of her childhood. i find all of this incredibly profound on so many levels. A woman who questioned, and imagined, and opened herself up to world of metaphors and mysticism, who has, in her own journey of deviance off of the path of religion, found her *own* faith, not just an inherited set of unquestioned beliefs. I can't wait to read her new series, "Songs of the Seraphim" http://www.annerice.com/ReaderInteraction-MessagesToFans.html
In answer to her fans begging for more Vampire Chronicles, she says:
"In spite of a flood of emails askng for a Christian Lestat novel (a novel in which Lestat is redeemed), and my own comment about this in the press, I am completely putting aside this project. After prayer, meditation, and much pondering, I do not think such a novel is possible. My present focus has to be on my novels about the life of Jesus Christ and I do not want to revisit the realm of my earlier books. I thank all of you who have written to me on this, both pro and con. You have helped me to think out the question. I can assure you; as things stand now there will be no Christian Lestat novel."
That is because her stories of demons, and now angels, are, to a certain extent *true* if one sees these things for what they are, which are simply very accurate observations of human nature. Lestat cannot be redeemed, because he has gone too far down the path of serving "evil."
Like humans, we learn to build up our exterior, and to push back our true and beautiful nature, filling ourselves with anger, fear and hate, pushing out love, making less and less room for beauty in our lives. When we do this consistently for too long, we walk ourselves toward a life of misery and pain, or metaphorically speaking, damnation. Lestat has too much fear anger and hate to be redeemed. So do a small group of the humans on the planet, but for most of us, we can always stop what we are doing and do something else, something better, that will make room for beauty and love on the planet.
Anne Rice's novels are all beautiful, and entertaining. They are very insightful studies of human psychology as well. And for some, she might serve as a prophetess, if one is inclined to consider the possibility of such things.
What an amazing story, The Passion of Anne Rice.




on the blog The Ethics of Prejudice, by the voice of reason.
http://progressiveu.org/blog/52605-ethics-prejudice#comment-296489
I've been wanting to write this one for awhile! Needs to be refined though, so any feedback is always appreciated :)
"O, I'm sorry you took that, -I meant that for the Devil, and you have stepped in and taken the blow. Don't get between me and the Devil, brother, and the you won't get hurt." --Billy Hibbard
I never would have guessed that Anne Rice is a Christian. Admittedly I have only read Interview, Lestat, and the first book in the Mayfair witches. Currently I'm reading Violin. The reason I say this is because she presents the idea that there is no devil or god, good or evil. However, I like Louis because he is a creature who is evil by nature but just wants to be "good."
For the record, most Christians do know the Bible is lacking. It ends around 12 before skipping to adulthood, and even his childhood was spotty because there are gospels missing. I think I would also disagree that the bible does not leave room for interpretation and we should blindly accept. Of course, each faith and church is difference.
By the way, I love Anne Rice. And good blog.
Like what you've read? Well, then here's more:
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/tricia0711
I never would have guessed that Anne Rice is a Christian.
She wasn't, at least not while she was writing the earlier books in The Vampire Chronicles. Ms. Rice converted to christianity, shortly before she wrote Memnoch the Devil. Fans of the series will note how that book has a dramatically different "feel" than the earlier (and more popular) books. The story comes across as heavily contrived in order to reconcile Ms. Rice's new (at the time) world view.
TTFN,
Blackout
---
Patriotic Atheism
---
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Progressive U community.
for making generalizations about Christians, I am learning that there a lot more progressive Christians than I thought, well actually that *some* Christians are capable of real faith as a life experience, and not just a religion. I like these Christians very much, and have a lot in common with them. As I have been blogging about faith and religion, i keep discovering more of them, so I feel like my ideas have a place in this crazy world.
I know too that most Christians are aware the Bible is lacking in its coverage of Jesus. That is not because people didn't write about his life though, they did, but the people who canonized the Bible left those pieces out. Those gnostic gospels are fascinating to me, and they were forbidden to me as a Christian. That upset me. I have seen a lot of research done around them lately, and there is much discussion of how accurate they are, how historically authentic they are, etc. but to me it doesn't make any sense to not include them in the Bible.. All parts of the Bible are questionable, both historically and archaeologically (meaning there is even question about when, where, or who wrote them and why) but they still have meaning to us.
They are still important anthropologically and in the study of human evolution. how did a religion progress from animal and human sacrifice to what it is today? It is an evolution of human psychology and intellect as well, a shift from animism to humanism, all of it is fascinating to me. The whole Bible has fragments of truth and fragments of misconceptions and misinterpretations, because all of it was written by a single person. I do not mean that the same person wrote all of it, but that each piece is only one person's perspective.
We can't know how accurate the information is because we don't know what their motives were, we don't know their sources. We don't know how many generations passed between events and their written description. We cannot ever know all that we would need to know to reconcile the Bible to Truth. So why not put all of it together!
Why leave out certain pieces? Who cares if Judas didn't write the Gospel of Judas? Who cares if its hundreds of years later. Someone decided that was an important story and began researching the best they could to gather as much information as possible, to present a different point of view to the already kaleidoscoped drama. I think it is all relevant.
Okay, sorry for the tangent, but this is my defense of all gnostic gospels, including Anne Rice's. At least she has thousands of years of prior research to fall back on, and at least she performed very stringent research with all the sources available to her now.
misnomer said:
"I would also disagree that the bible does not leave room for interpretation and we should blindly accept."
I agree with your disagreement, the Bible doesn't say that, Christians do (many, not all).
and then you said:
"Of course, each faith and church is difference."
yes, and most of the time when i am critical of christians i am referring to the ones i know, who raised me and shaped my understanding of christianity that i have today, which has actually softened quite a bit through doing my scrapbooking. I apologize now and for past generalizations of Christians i have made if they are not representative of you or any other readers.
"O, I'm sorry you took that, -I meant that for the Devil, and you have stepped in and taken the blow. Don't get between me and the Devil, brother, and the you won't get hurt." --Billy Hibbard
Another very appropriate name for this blog, or for my next one...
"O, I'm sorry you took that, -I meant that for the Devil, and you have stepped in and taken the blow. Don't get between me and the Devil, brother, and the you won't get hurt." --Billy Hibbard