So last night I watched the movie Battle in Seattle at the Red and Black Cafe, a worker-owned collective cafe (which I am hoping to get a job at.) For those of you who don't know, Battle in Seattle is a movie about the 1999 protests in Seattle to the WTO (World Trade Organization,) meeting there. You might say, "why would anyone protest the WTO? That sounds like such a good thing, like a group that fosters free, borderless trade for everyone..." This is what the WTO would have you believe, but in reality, they've caused more problems then they've solved. For one thing, the WTO is largely responsible for all those evil campaigns that have allowed Nestle to make mommas in developing nations question their milk supply and start feeding their babies formula, with dirty well water, which has led to uncountable deaths around the world. The WTO has also encouraged Monsanto to expand GMOs (genetically modified organisms,) in all sorts of sectors, by blocking negotiations on a Biosafety Protocol to regulate the use of and trade in genetically modified organisms under the Biodiversity Convention. These are just two small examples of how the WTO has made life for everyone harder/worse and why activists would feel compelled to protest their meeting. For more information about the WTO: http://www.poptel.org.uk/panap/latest/wto10.htm
So the movie is about the protest, which lasted five days and turned Seattle upside down; to the point where many residents of the Capitol Hill district of Seattle joined the protesters, because they where tired of the police flooding their neighborhood with pepper spray, and later, when they ran out of pepper spray, nerve gas. (The whole nerve gas thing supposedly happened by accident, when police went to a nearby military base to restock their pepper spray and someone supposedly accidentally picked up canisters of nerve gas; a lawsuit has been filed by many activists as well as residents of Seattle for damage done to them due to the nerve gas, which they won.)
Anyway, I thought it was a terrible movie for three reasons; reason #1: the only anarcho-black-clad protester the movie showed was a cop infiltrator, who was actually reporting back to the cops about what the anarchists where up to, reason #2, the main theme of the movie seemed to be that protesters are a violent, unruly group who tend to cause more misery by their actions, especially when they "force" the cops to get out of hand by doing things like, say, breaking windows. #3 By disrupting the WTO, the movie seemed to suggest, people who would have had a chance to actually make a difference, like a man who was trying to persuade big pharma to give AIDS drugs to people in Africa, or at least offer them at a cheaper price, was not able to speak to the people who could have possibly made that difference, and therefore, the protesters actually made life worse for some people. I'm not sure I would agree with that hypothetical scenario. Basically, don't watch Battle in Seattle if you want to learn about the evils of the WTO, which was what I was hoping to learn from the movie.
Secondly, I've been thinking a lot lately about what makes a person a radical; are we born radical, or do we gradually assume that role as we grow up and realize how fucked up the world is? I think, speaking for myself, I've always been a radical, by which I mean, I've always have a large amount of love and have always been disgusted with the things I perceived as wrong with the world, starting at a very young age. For example, when I was about seven, my life centered around playing in a creek by our house. A dairy farmer owned the fields on the other side of the creek, and one day, I went down to the creek to play and saw that the farmer had used a bulldozer to change the course of the creek and to knock down some trees. I ran home, furious, and tears streaming from my face, yelled at my mom, "we've gotta tell him it's wrong!" "What's wrong honey?" I remember her saying. "It's wrong and he can't do that....he shouldn't just change the creek like that!" I continued to yell at my mom that we needed to have a confrontation with the farmer for a very long time, and on and off for days to follow. She agreed with me that it was environmentally destructive, but, of course, since he'd moved dirt and trees on his property, she would not go with me to confront him. I often would yell at my mom (which is kind of akin to e-mailing a governor, a state legislator, and the like about some issue that is bothering you; usually it does little to nothing to change things,) whenever I saw evil in the world. I reported to my mom about the child abuse I saw in my school all the way up through, she got to hear about dogs that never got off their chains which I would walk by, and the pain in my heart when I saw girls in my class cutting themselves and threatening suicide to get some much-needed attention. I guess what I'm saying is this; I've always been a radical, I've always, always wanted to change things, and no matter what changes in my life; I doubt this passion, this fire will subside.
Love ya,
Carrot




but did the protest accomplish anything? in the end some people ended up with extra money in their pockets.
would you call the protest an efficient method for change?
what would be an efficient method to start change?
I know that this question is meant for Carrot, but I thought I would weigh in as well.
I do not believe that the protest accomplished what it was meant to and that it did more harm than good. First, we'll put aside the poor reputation Seattle was branded with for the few months following the events. I was living in a suburb near Seattle at the time, and was eleven. I don't even know what exactly was the actions that were being protested, although I should go and research it. and I had a teacher that liked to discuss the days events at the beginning of class, and classmates whose parents' went to work near where the protests and all the action was occuring. What I do remember, however, is that a kid pushed a box of Nikes off of a building (one of my classmates claimed he was wearing Nike shoes) who admitted in an interview that he knew nothing about WTO and their actions. And that people came from Portland and even farther to protest. My teacher stressed the point that many of the protestors were peaceful and within their rights, but the true trouble-makers were just having fun. I'm going to have to watch that movie now, I didn't even know they made one. Was it a documentary or what?
Like what you've read? Well, then here's more:
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/tricia0711
I was in the area, too, and though I was pretty young, I only remember people talking about the hub-bub and not what it all meant.
I think that's a common thing with big events. It's more of a "oh my gosh, did you hear what happened?" instead of "This happened because..."
It's unfortunate. I was too young to care about what happened, but if I can relate it to any type of intense situation that's happened recently, I know that people care more about the excitement surrounding a situation than the situation itself.
I was hoping for a movie which told more about what the people protesting where protesting, what the WTO is all about, etc. If that is the movie you want to see, this movie, Battle in Seattle is not for you. Battle in Seattle is the dramatic, Hollywood verison of what happened; there is even a love story of sorts between two of the protesters...I would have prefered that they cut the love story and instead tell us more about the types of evil things the WTO accomplishes.
There are some movies out there which are documentaries of the Battle in Seattle; one is called Breaking the Spell, I cannot recommend it as I have not yet seen it, but some friends of mine say it is a much more accurate protrayal of what happened, what people where battling for, etc.
Was anything accomplished? For sure. From an activist standpoint, this was one of the most successful protests in the history of protests...for one thing, everyone started talking about the WTO, what it was and what it did, etc. For another, most of the weeklong events and meetings that the WTO had planned where canceled. Since protests rarely do much at all, from the standpoint of the folks who where involved (I've interviewed several since viewing this movie, to see what they thought of the whole event,) it was a huge success.
Love ya,
Carrot
I was hoping for a movie which told more about what the people protesting where protesting, what the WTO is all about, etc. If that is the movie you want to see, this movie, Battle in Seattle is not for you. Battle in Seattle is the dramatic, Hollywood verison of what happened; there is even a love story of sorts between two of the protesters...I would have prefered that they cut the love story and instead tell us more about the types of evil things the WTO accomplishes.
There are some movies out there which are documentaries of the Battle in Seattle; one is called Breaking the Spell, I cannot recommend it as I have not yet seen it, but some friends of mine say it is a much more accurate protrayal of what happened, what people where battling for, etc.
Was anything accomplished? For sure. From an activist standpoint, this was one of the most successful protests in the history of protests...for one thing, everyone started talking about the WTO, what it was and what it did, etc. For another, most of the weeklong events and meetings that the WTO had planned where canceled. Since protests rarely do much at all, from the standpoint of the folks who where involved (I've interviewed several since viewing this movie, to see what they thought of the whole event,) it was a huge success.
Love ya,
Carrot