Gay Marriage?

Gay marriage has been the topic of main debate in the United States. Both candidates for the election agree on acceptance of gay marriage in the United States. As a Christian though i find the answer to this question more serious than just accepting the gay community as they are. The Bible teaches against passing judgment on others as only an act of God, meaning God is the one and only judge. But the Bible also teaches that every Christian has a duty as a disciple and as a disciple you are suppost to lead and encourage your generation to also lead and follow in Christ. That is why I do not agree with gay marriage or the wrongful morals that go along with the title. I am not one to stand back and watch our world fall deeper in sin without voicing my opinion or resentment to topics that go along with "worldly values." Gay marriage is a "worldly" accepted lifestyle. As a Christian though i do not like the worldly ideas and acceptance of sin in my life. I do not accept the world's opinion on life, I accept God's opinion on life. It is against my right as an American to be forced to recognize a group of people exploiting my religion and faith. Gays did not invent marriage, God did. Gay marriage could and should be stopped.

Until I see a god then I would believe my sexual orientation is wrong. I may believe it is wrong if I do see him, but it would never change my sexual attraction towards women.

When the world believes in one god then I would beleive there is a god if I never see it.

whispers awnesty's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

So what you are saying is that a homosexual can not possibly follow after Christ?
I thought he died so that all may live and have ever lasting life. We should all live exactly like Christ did without deviation? The last I checked, he did not have any intimate/ sexual relationships.

Some out there believe that Jesus was gay and advocating for his rights even way back then...but those are just a few crazy heads out there that have twisted it to suit their own views.

Anyway read.

Love is like a box of chocolates; if you chose wisely you won’t be disappointed and have to spit it out. ~T

No one's perfect and everyone sins. And if you read God's word (The Bible) you will find valuable information on why homosexuality is bad. It is describe in the book of Paul, Romans, and throughout the New and Old testament and condemns those who act in homosexuality. So if you are a Follower of Christ you have to know your sin and ask for forgiveness. Making gay marriage legal would be the complete opposite and against what God wants for you.

whispers awnesty's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

Hmmm...Yes. Everything I have read indicates that acting on homosexuality (gay sex) would be against the teaching. Being attracked to the same sex and not acting on it is not addressed...to my knowledge. I wonder why its so much 'worse' to commit sins of homosexuality then it is to break other sex rules by straights (ie pre marital sex, sodomy, and oral sex)?

Love is like a box of chocolates; if you chose wisely you won’t be disappointed and have to spit it out. ~T

Honestly that is probably one of the biggest issues in the Homosexuality debate. A person will condemn homosexuality on one side but permit and sometimes encourage other forms of extramarital sexuality. Regardless of whether it takes place between a man and a man or a woman and a woman or a man and a woman it is the same behavior that is sex outside of marriage.

I would never be one to say that those experiencing homosexual tendencies are lying or making them up they are real things, the "sin" is not in having them, it is in acting on them, but just like any tendency a person may have, they need to be controlled.

ediblewoman's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

Then get back to me on that.

"Never go with a hippy to a second location."
~Jack Donaghy
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman

ediblewoman's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

Read all about it!

I wrote a blog about my evil, disgusting, vile lifestyle. You (and everyone who reads your blog) should read it. You can find it here:
http://www.progressiveu.org/211551-gay-life-our-dastardly-plan-destroy-i...

"Never go with a hippy to a second location."
~Jack Donaghy
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman

the holier trinity's picture

You evil, disgusting, vile heathen!! Off with your head!


I am not the Messiah... Honestly!

Only the true Messiah denies His divinity.

What? Well, what sort of chance does that give me? All right! I am the Messiah!

He is! He is the Messiah!

Now, fuck off!

How shall we fuck off, O Lord?

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

..our Constitution protects us from people who think that they can use the law to force other people to conform with their religious beliefs. I mean, it is really so hard to understand the words, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...?"

TTFN,
Blackout

-------------------------
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Progressive U community.

The United States was founded by Protestants. Whether you accept that fact or not, it is the truth. Although Christianity isn't the "official" religion of the U.S., the ideas are built all throughout our Constitution.

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association
Quote:

The United States was founded by Protestants. Whether you accept that fact or not, it is the truth.

To quote one of my favorite Founding Fathers...

Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination. ~ Thomas Jefferson

I think it is obvious that our Founding Fathers did not agree with the intention of your premise.

Quote:

Although Christianity isn't the "official" religion of the U.S., the ideas are built all throughout our Constitution.

And our early Congress was commissioned by George Washington (though it was John Adams who actually signed the final act) to pass a law during its 5th sitting session that rejects this notion, as well.

[T]he Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion. ~ Treaty of Tripoli

I would suggest that our Constitution is based primarily on Greek models, not christian ones. Perhaps you could enlighten us, by pointing to the specific passages of the Constitution that you think are of christian origin...?

TTFN,
Blackout

-------------------------
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Progressive U community.

Well God is mentioned all throughout our government if you would like to take a look around. It's even on our money, "In God We Trust." "One nation under God," is also mentioned in our pledge of allegiance. Our Constitution embodies Christian morals, such as, "Though shall not murder," "Though shall not steal," "Though shall not lie." You cannot murder in the United States, you cannot steal in the United States, and you cannot lie in the court of law in the United States. As far as the Founding Fathers go, yes Thomas Jefferson was for separation of religion from state. And I agree making Christianity an "official" religion would cause problems. As a Christian you do not force anyone to become a Christian. It is their responsibility to find Jesus. Everyone has their day of Judgment. That did not stop the Founding Fathers in putting in the ideas and morals into our Constitution.

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

...but did NOT say anything of the sort in their original forms. People often forget that the founding fathers didn't pick "In god we trust" as our nation's motto, or include it on our original currency. They picked "E Pluribus Unum," (or "One From Many"). "In God We Trust" didn't appear on U.S. currency until it was placed on the 2-cent coin in 1864. Personally, I really LOVE the motto that IS found on much of our earliest currency...

Look closely...it says, "MIND YOUR BUSINESS," which I think is GREAT advice.

The phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance is a similarly late addition to an already-existing U.S. tradition. The creator of the Pledge, Francis Bellamy, did not include the phrase "under God" in the Pledge at all. The original Pledge as written by Mr. Bellamy and published in 1892 read, "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." Even when the U.S. Congress officially adopted the Pledge as part of the 1942 United States Flag Code, it read "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The simple truth is that these changes were perpetuated by men and women who were more interested in their religion than they were with protecting the actual heritage of this country.

Quote:

Our Constitution embodies Christian morals, such as, "Though shall not murder," "Though shall not steal," "Though shall not lie." You cannot murder in the United States, you cannot steal in the United States, and you cannot lie in the court of law in the United States.

Certainly you don't think that the taboos against murder, lying or stealing originated with the christian religion, do you? Aside from the fact that such a belief would be ridiculous, it just doesn't hold water historically, with the founding our our country's legal system. Our jurisprudence originated in the Common Law of England, and to once again quote my good friend, Mr. Jefferson...

"For we know that the common law is that system of law which was introduced by the Saxons on their settlement of England, and altered from time to time by proper legislative authority from that time to the date of the Magna Charta, which terminates the period of the common law ... This settlement took place about the middle of the fifth century. But Christianity was not introduced till the seventh century; the conversion of the first Christian king of the Heptarchy having taken place about the year 598, and that of the last about 686. Here then, was a space of two hundred years, during which the common law was in existence, and Christianity no part of it ... That system of religion could not be a part of the common law, because they were not yet Christians." ~ Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814

I'm sorry to break this to you, but whoever has been teaching you Early American History doesn't know what they are talking about.

TTFN,
Blackout

-------------------------
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Progressive U community.

You haven't done your homework then. Thomas Jefferson is only one of the few who did not express there open love for God.

John Adams and John Hancock:
We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus! [April 18, 1775]

John Adams:
“ The general principles upon which the Fathers achieved independence were the general principals of Christianity… I will avow that I believed and now believe that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.”
• “[July 4th] ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty.”
–John Adams in a letter written to Abigail on the day the Declaration was approved by Congress

"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." --October 11, 1798

Benjamin Franklin: | Portrait of Ben Franklin
“ God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel” –Constitutional Convention of 1787 | original manuscript of this speech

Thomas Jefferson
“ The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend to all the happiness of man.”

“Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus.”

"I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus."

“God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever.” (excerpts are inscribed on the walls of the Jefferson Memorial in the nations capital) [Source: Merrill . D. Peterson, ed., Jefferson Writings, (New York: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., 1984), Vol. IV, p. 289. From Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia, Query XVIII, 1781.]

I can put more if you would like. And i would like to add George Washington also kept a prayer journal. so to say our country was not founded by Protestants, would not be true. The principles of our Constitution were found by these morals. God Bless.

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association
Quote:

John Adams and John Hancock:
We Recognize No Sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus! [April 18, 1775]

This quote is, of course, anecdotal. It does not appear in the writings of either John Adams or John Hancock. The sources for this quote are the accounts of the skirmish known as the Battle at Lexington Green. Adams and Hancock were present for this encounter, but despite the common mis-citations that you will find around the internet, the exclamation is actually attributed to either the Rev. Jonas Clark, or Captain John Parker. Though the accounts disagree, in all likelihood the speaker was Parker, who was leading the militiamen that confronted the British forces led by Major John Pitcairn.

Quote:

John Adams:
“ The general principles upon which the Fathers achieved independence were the general principals of Christianity… I will avow that I believed and now believe that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God.”

As was often the case, this was a point on which Jefferson and Adams disagreed, and I would suggest that the previous quote I provided you from Jefferson demonstrates why this belief is flawwed. But I also think it is interesting to read what Jefferson wrote back to Adams, in response to this...

In extracting the pure principles which he [Jesus] taught, we should have to strip off the artificial vestments in which they have been muffled by priests, who have travestied them into various forms, as instruments of riches and power to them.

Quote:

• “[July 4th] ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty.”
–John Adams in a letter written to Abigail on the day the Declaration was approved by Congress
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." --October 11, 1798

There is no doubt that John Adams was a religious man (though he is more accurately described as a deist rather than a christian), but like most of our founding fathers he understood the necessity of keeping's one's private religious beliefs both out of and out of reach of one's government. Historical revisionists often like to quote men like Adams from correspondences whose contexts do not directly relate to the question of church/state separation. When Mr. Adams did speak and write specifically on that subject of religious encroachments (such as "under god" and "in god we trust"), here is what he had to say (from his Detached Memoranda),,,

"The danger of silent accumulations & encroachments by Ecclesiastical Bodies have not sufficiently engaged attention in the U. S....Strongly guarded as is the separation between Religion & Govt in the Constitution of the United States the danger of encroachment by Ecclesiastical Bodies, may be illustrated by precedents already furnished in their short history."

A few years after the young John Adams wrote the letter to his wife which you quoted above, the older, more mature Mr. Adams wrote this...

"Thirteen governments thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favour of the rights of mankind."

Quote:

Benjamin Franklin: | Portrait of Ben Franklin
“ God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel” –Constitutional Convention of 1787 | original manuscript of this speech

Ah...the Franklin Prayer Myth. It amazes me how these things get loose on the internet but never go away, even after they are debunked. Okay...first thing: This quotation does not come from an original manuscript of the speech. The documents of the Constitutional Convention only say that Franklin proposed a day of prayer to the Convention, and that motion was never passed (which hardly indicates a strong religious fervor in the men attending the Convention, wouldn't you agree?). This is a point of great interest. One will always be able to find individual opinions that seem to support one position or another, but what is important to remember is what these men actually set down when it came time to put pen to paper in the writing of our Constitution (as well as the other documents which defined our early government).

Our source for this is actually James Madison, who made note of Franklin's speech during the Constitutional Convention. We have to be careful when attributing "quotations" that come only from secondary sources, though Madison is a reliable source and we can safely suppose that his account is at least very close to what was actually said. But what else did Goode Benjamin have to say...?

"When a religion is good, I conceive it will support itself; and when it does not support itself, and God does not take care to support it so that its professors are obliged to call for help of the civil power, 'tis a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one."

It is also well established in the literature that Franklin was a consummate politician, and held his often mercurial public views quite apart from his private beliefs. In that regard, Mr. Franklin said...

"I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies."

In his Autobiography, Mr. Franklin commented on his friend the Rev.Mr. Whitefield, saying...

He used, indeed, sometimes to pray for my conversion, but never had the satisfaction of believing that his prayers were heard.

Turning to Jefferson (below), these are all classic cases of quote mining, and all are in reference to Jefferson's work on the Jefferson Bible, the whole point of which was to take the story of Jesus and separate it from its religious pretext, which Jefferson rejected.

Quote:

Thomas Jefferson
“ The doctrines of Jesus are simple, and tend to all the happiness of man.”

I must comment that these quotes seem like an odd defense for your position that, Although Christianity isn't the "official" religion of the U.S., the ideas are built all throughout our Constitution." What Mr. Jefferson believed about christianity (which was a quite a bit different than what you have suggested) is a separate topic. It is interesting to note that in the very same letter that you quote from above, Mr. Jefferson said...

I rejoince that in this blessed country of free inquiry and belief, which has surrendered its creed and conscience to neither kings nor priests, the genuine doctrine of only one God is reviving...But much I fear, that when this great truth shall be re-established, its votaries will fall into the fatal error of fabricating formulas of creed and confessions of faith."

Quote:

“Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern which have come under my observation, none appears to me so pure as that of Jesus.”

Here, it is interesting to see what follows immediately after this passage in the same letter...

"He who follows this steadily need not, I think, be uneasy, although he cannot comprehend the subtleties and mysteries erected on his doctrines by those who, calling them­ selves his special followers and favorites, would make him come into the world to lay snares for all understandings but theirs. These metaphysical heads, usurping the judgment seat of God, denounce as his enemies all who cannot perceive the Geomet­rical logic of Euclid in the demonstrations of St. Athanasius, that three are one, and one is three; and yet that the one is not three nor the three one."

Jeffersion viewed Jesus as a man...a good man, but still only a man. In fact, in another of his letters to John Adams, he wrote...

"The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the Supreme Being as his father, in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter."

It is unfortunate that we still don't seem to have reached this laudable goal.

Quote:

"I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus."

I'm not 100% sure of the source of this quote, though it is attributed to be written on the inner cover of the Jefferson Bible. But, once again, we can turn to other sources within Jefferson's writings for clarity. Specifically speaking on this subject in a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush, Mr. Jefferson wrote (ephasis per the original)...

"To the corruptions of Christianity I am indeed opposed, but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian, in the only sense in which he wished anyone to be: sincerely attached to his doctrines in preference to all others, ascribing to himself every human excellence, and believing he never claimed any other."

But again, this seems not to support your contentions regarding the christian religion and our Constitution. Jefferson specifically addresses this as well in the same letter (emphasis mine, this time)...

"I am moreover averse to the communication of my religious tenets to the public, because it would countenance the presumption of those who have endeavored to draw them before that tribunal, and to seduce public opinion to erect itself into that inquisition over the rights of conscience which the laws have so justly proscribed. It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others; or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own. It behooves him, too, in his own case, to give no example of concession, betraying the common right of independent opinion, by answering questions of faith which the laws have left between God and himself."

So once again, we see clear evidence that our Founding Fathers wished to keep religious insertions such as the ones you mentioned OUT of our government, while also keeping groups of religious citizens from using the government to force their religious beliefs onto other citizens.

Quote:

“God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are a gift from God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, and that His justice cannot sleep forever.” (excerpts are inscribed on the walls of the Jefferson Memorial in the nations capital) [Source: Merrill . D. Peterson, ed., Jefferson Writings, (New York: Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., 1984), Vol. IV, p. 289. From Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia, Query XVIII, 1781.]

This is not an accurate quote from the works of Thomas Jefferson. This is a composite pasted together from several sources to paint a more religious Jeffersion than the actual sources indicated. One of those sources was Jefferson's Notes of the State of Virginia, which interestingly also contains a passage that specifically addresses the question actually at hand in this discussion...

"The present state of our laws on the subject of religion is this. The convention of May 1776, in their declaration of rights, declared it to be a truth, and a natural right, that the exercise of religion should be free...Statutory oppressions in religion being thus wiped away, we remain at present under those only imposed by the common law, or by our own acts of assembly...This is a summary view of that religious slavery, under which a people have been willing to remain, who have lavished their lives and fortunes for the establishment of their civil freedom. The error seems not sufficiently eradicated, that the operations of the mind, as well as the acts of the body, are subject to the coercion of the laws....The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg...They have made the happy discovery, that the way to silence religious disputes, is to take no notice of them. Let us too give this experiment fair play, and get rid, while we may, of those tyrannical laws.

From reading your comments thus far, I would be surprised if you have done any serious study of Early American history and cultures. The quotes you have utilized are common internet-based canards whose use originates in the works of religiously motivated historical revisionists.

Quote:

I can put more if you would like.

Please do. I never get tired of debunking myths, and I find the task of re-educating people who have been lied to about our nation's history to be a most worthy and rewarding undertaking.

Quote:

And i would like to add George Washington also kept a prayer journal. so to say our country was not founded by Protestants, would not be true. The principles of our Constitution were found by these morals. God Bless.

You might want to do some REAL research, first, since the Washington Prayer journal has been rejected by the Smithsonian as a non-authentic document.

"The so-called prayer journal is not in GW's writing, although I'm not sure it's actually a forgery. The manuscript dealer (Burk I think) who first sold it when it came to light in the 19th century printed a facsimile edition in which he admits that the Smithsonian rejected it as a non-GW document, but it did have Washington family provenance, so he said. Thus it apparently was a descendant's. Johnson's version is taken from Burk. The prayers are based on the English prayer book." ~ Frank Grizzard (senior associate editor of the George Washington Papers collection at University of Virginia)

TTFN,
Blackout

-------------------------
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Progressive U community.

Your response is solely based on opinion and it is clear your evidence could be completely flawed as mine. I found the information in a history book along with reliable internet sources. So to call my information incorrect would again not be true. I plan on being a history major and as well received an A in all my hisory classes. I know where to find information. We can go back and forth forever. Bottomline is that you cannot prove your information completely factual. I would like to say you put up a good debate though. I respect your opinion, but clearly this is going no where. We both conceive different opinions. I wil fight hard to protect our nations' heritage. As a Christian i can take harsh criticizm from any side. To say our Founding Fathers were not Protestant and did not use the beliefs of Christianity in their erecting our Constitution is solely opinion. I love God along with our country. I will not stand back and watch as our country slips more into immoral deed. Our Founding fathers would frown upon what happens in today's society. I pray for people to find a new direction. If you would like any information on God or share any interests in history, (sonce we both have a passion for it), feel free to message me back. God Bless.

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

I have consistently pointed pack to primary source documents actually written by the men we are talking about in which they discuss specifically the topic of the proper relationship between government and religion. You have given few sources (including several inaccurate ones), and I suspect that your "reliable internet sources" are anything but reliable. I don't mean this to be inflammatory. There is a great deal of fraudulent information floating around on the net, and one really has to go back and read the original documents (or at least facsimile maintained by a credible scholarly source) if one wants to develop an informed opinion on these issues. If you would like to cite your sources, I would be happy to discuss their objective credibility with you.

Quote:

To say our Founding Fathers were not Protestant and did not use the beliefs of Christianity in their erecting our Constitution is solely opinion.

Ah, but that's NOT what I said. YOU inaccurately attributed that position to me in one of your earlier comments. I said that many of the men you referenced were christian (or more accurately, deists), but that they understood the need to keep their religious and their government separate from one another. If you are a history buff, perhaps you have read de Toqueville's Democracy in America. It is regarded as a classical examination of early American politics and society. In chapter 17, de Toqueville says...

"On my arrival in the United States the religious aspect of the country was the first thing that struck my attention; and the longer I stayed there, the more I perceived the great political consequences resulting from this new state of things. In France I had almost always seen the spirit of religion and the spirit of freedom marching in opposite directions. But in America I found they were intimately united and that they reigned in common over the same country. My desire to discover the causes of this phenomenon increased from day to day. In order to satisfy it I questioned the members of all the different sects; I sought especially the society of the clergy, who are the depositaries of the different creeds and are especially interested in their duration. As a member of the Roman Catholic Church, I was more particularly brought into contact with several of its priests, with whom I became intimately acquainted. To each of these men I expressed my astonishment and explained my doubts. I found that they differed upon matters of detail alone, and that they all attributed the peaceful dominion of religion in their country mainly to the separation of church and state. I do not hesitate to affirm that during my stay in America I did not meet a single individual, of the clergy or the laity, who was not of the same opinion on this point."

Quote:

I love God along with our country.

You can love both as much as you like, but those feelings do not give you the right to violate the Constitutionally protected freedoms of other citizens by attempting to create religious establishments. Nor do those feelings excuse the misrepresentation of our actual history which you have perhaps unknowingly perpetuated.

Quote:

I will not stand back and watch as our country slips more into immoral deed.

Morality is a subjective beast, and I would suggest that your reactions threaten the very "rights of conscience" that our Founding Fathers sought to protect.

Quote:

Our Founding fathers would frown upon what happens in today's society.

That's your opinion. I would suggest that there are many qualities of our matured nation of which the Founders would greatly approve.

Quote:

I pray for people to find a new direction. If you would like any information on God or share any interests in history, (sonce we both have a passion for it), feel free to message me back. God Bless.

As for information on "god," I had my fill of that many years ago. But for history, I am always happy to engage in a historical discourse.

TTFN,
Blackout

-------------------------
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Progressive U community.

You really like to pick apart my responses. And you are entitled to your opinions and the resources you are able to conjure information from, as am I. I also agree there is ample information defending both sides as you and I have both found. I hope you have not given up on your faith in God through your endeavors in life. As for history we both reveal a strong passion for it along with some different views. As for this topic on religion and government, i will leave you this quote from George Washington in his Farewell Address, (be open minded). "Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in Courts of Justice?" This made me think awhile about it.

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

...and so I will respond to you in a new thread, below.

TTFN,
Blackout

-------------------------
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Progressive U community.

Separation between Church and State. our nation is founded on this principile. we are not a country that is ruled by the Bible nor should we be ruled by a Bible because it is a religious belief, idea; a matter of opinion.
if the bible was the law then people wouldnt be able to engage in sexual activity unless they loved someone, perhaps there be a law that women would have to dress in traditional garb, and by law men would have to be the head of the household.
there would be a law that everyone must not pick up a hand or finger on the Sabbath or risk going to jail.
and there would be a law that wouldnt allow people to curse God in vain.

it would look as if we would lose most of our civil rights.

that's kind of a selfish thing to say, that you shouldn't have to be forced to recognize same-sex marriage, and that's why it should be banned. nobody said that everyone has to agree with it. you can call it wrong until you're blue in the face, but it doesn't make you right. it's an opinion. no specific person is right. the option should be there, if people want to take advantage of it. if you're against gay marriage, don't marry one. it's that simple. as for your religion telling you to show people the way of god, it's not that simple. if it was, we wouldn't have pedophiles and murderers. our constitution's first amendment gives us the freedom of religion, so it would be uncomstitutional to write legislation based on christian values. and as for god creating marriage, there are plenty of people that don't believe in the god you're referring to that are legally married, and one of the ten commandments tells people not to worship any other god so wouldn't that be just as much of a sin as homosexuality? gay people didn't vote against straight people's marriage rights, so why should we vote against theirs? these people are adults, and should be free to make their own decisions about who they love.

Do we really always have to take it back to the founding fathers? The fact is that the country was created to adjust to change, we don't need to take every issue back to the founding fathers we have provisions in our constitution to deal with them the way we want to now. Subsequently I would say that regardless of when we add things like "in god we trust" or "under God" it reflects what are or once were American values and we have the right to defend or change these regardless of what the founding fathers would have done. You will remember that they didn't give voting rights to most Americans either, would we over turn that now because they wouldn't endorse it?

sawaboof's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

Embedded into each comment is a link titled "reply."

Using this link allows you to reply to an individual user. This helps the conversation flow much better, as the person you are replying to will actually notice you replied to them.


"What a crazy random happenstance!"
Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog

Read my Blog!

I agree. The phrase "under god" was not added to the Pledge until 1954, as a sort of "nah, nah" to the USSR, which was an atheist state. "In God we Trust' isn't our national motto, it's just on our money. Our motto is "E Pluribus Unum."

~Violinstef

ediblewoman's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

I thought MONEY was our motto. :-))

"Never go with a hippy to a second location."
~Jack Donaghy
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association
Quote:

As for this topic on religion and government, i will leave you this quote from George Washington in his Farewell Address, (be open minded). "Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in Courts of Justice?"

Rather than considering a single quote, I would counter with the suggestion that you should read the body of Washington's writings, but public and private, and then consider as well the wealth of scholarship (both contemporary and current) regarding his life and beliefs. When you do, I think you will find that Mr. Washington's piety was something that he effected to further his political position by appealing to a certain constituency (not unlike what we see so often in modern politicians). In fact, "The Old Fox" as he was called by his contemporaries was quite evasive regarding his personal beliefs, though he was often known to pander to a religious constituency. Thomas Jefferson wrote with some humor about Washington's skill in avoiding any admission as to his personal beliefs about religion...

"Dr. Rush told me (he had it from Asa Green) that when the clergy addressed General Washington, on his departure from the government, it was observed in their consultation that he had never, on any occasion, said a word to the public which showed a belief in the Christian religion, and they thought they should so pen their address as to force him at length to disclose publicly whether he was a Christian or not. However, he observed, the old fox was too cunning for them. He answered every article of their address particularly, except that, which he passed over without notice." ~ Thomas Jefferson, quoted from Jefferson's Works, Vol. iv., p. 572.

Jefferson also wrote about Washington in his private journals that...

"I know that Gouverneur Morris, who claimed to be in his secrets, and believed himself to be so, has often told me that General Washington believed no more in that system than he did." The mentioned "system" of course, was christianity.

The famous barrister John Bell wrote in 1779 that Washington was "a total stranger to religious prejudices, which have so often excited Christians of one denomination to cut the throats of those of another."

Many of the day's prominent religious figures did not believe Washington to be devout in the least, either. Even the Rev. Dr. James Abercrombie (who was the rector of the church which Washington sometimes attended) stated that "Washington was a Deist", and The Rev. Abercrombie went futher in his comments, and stating in an 1833 letter that...

"With respect to the inquiry you make, I can only state the following facts: that as pastor of the Episcopal Church, observing that, on sacramental Sundays George Washington, immediately after the desk and pulpit services, went out with the greater part of the congregation -- always leaving Mrs. Washington with the other communicants -- she invariably being one -- I considered it my duty, in a sermon on public worship, to state the unhappy tendency of example, particularly of those in elevated stations, who uniformly turned their backs on the Lord's Supper. I acknowledge the remark was intended for the President; and as such he received it. A few days after, in conversation, I believe, with a Senator of the United States, he told me he had dined the day before with the President, who, in the course of conversation at the table, said that, on the previous Sunday, he had received a very just rebuke from the pulpit for always leaving the church before the administration of the sacrament; that he honored the preacher for his integrity and candor; that he had never sufficiently considered the influence of his example, and that he would not again give cause for the repetition of the reproof; and that, as he had never been a communicant, were he to become one then, it would be imputed to an ostentatious display of religious zeal, arising altogether from his elevated station. Accordingly, he never afterwards came on the morning of sacrament Sunday, though at other times he was a constant attendant in the morning."

The Rev. Bird Wilson (another prominent Episcopal leader) wrote this and delivered it as part of a sermon describing the religious beliefs of our early presidents.

"When Congress sat in Philadelphia, President Washington attended the Episcopal Church. The rector, Dr. Abercrombie, told me that on the days when the sacrament of the Lord's Supper was to be administered, Washington's custom was to arise just before the ceremony commenced, and walk out of the church. This became a subject of remark in the congregation, as setting a bad example. At length the Doctor undertook to speak of it, with a direct allusion to the President. Washington was heard afterwards to remark that this was the first time a clergyman had thus preached to him, and he should henceforth neither trouble the Doctor or his congregation on such occasions, and ever after that, upon communion days, 'he absented himself altogether from church.'"

The Rev. Bird was a noted scholar of Washington's life. In 1831, he said in an interview with Robert Owen that...

"I have diligently perused every line that Washington ever gave to the public, and I do not find one expression in which he pledges, himself as a believer in Christianity. I think anyone who will candidly do as I have done, will come to the conclusion that he was a Deist and nothing more."

He went on to say in another, later letter that...

"His behavior in church was always serious and attentive, but as your letter seems to intend an inquiry on the point of kneeling during the service, I owe it to the truth to declare that I never saw him in the said attitude.... Although I was often in the company of this great man, and had the honor of often dining at his table, I never heard anything from him which could manifest his opinions on the subject of religion.... Within a few days of his leaving the Presidential chair, our vestry waited on him with an address prepared and delivered by me. In his answer he was pleased to express himself gratified by what he had heard from our pulpit; but there was nothing that committed him relatively to religious theory."

When Owens (who later became a Congressman) finally published his report on his discussions about Washington with the Rev. Bird, he said this...

"I called last evening on Dr. Wilson, as I told you I should, and I have seldom derived more pleasure from a short interview with anyone. Unless my discernment of character has been grievously at fault, I met an honest man and a sincere Christian. But you shall have the particulars. A gentleman of this city accompanied me to the Doctor's residence. We were very courteously received. I found him a tall, commanding figure, with a countenance of much benevolence, and a brow indicative of deep thought, apparently 50 years of age. I opened the interview by stating that though personally a stranger to him, I had taken the liberty of calling in consequence of having perused an interesting sermon of his, which had been reported in the Daily Advertiser of this city, and regarding which, as he probably knew, a variety of opinions prevailed. In a discussion, in which I had taken part, some of the facts as there reported had been questioned; and I wished to know from him whether the reporter had fairly given his words or not. I then read to him from a copy of the Daily Advertiser the paragraph which regards Washington, beginning, 'Washington was a man,' etc., and ending 'absented himself altogether from church.' 'I endorse,' said Dr. Wilson with emphasis, 'every word of that. Nay, I do not wish to conceal from you any part of the truth, even what I have not given to the public. Dr. Abercrombie said more than I have repeated. At the close of our conversation on the subject his emphatic expression was -- for I well remember the very words "Sir, Washington was a Deist.""

Washington was actually quite typical of the men who served as our earliest Presidents, and in the Rev. Bird's famous 1831 sermon, he had this to say about George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson, respectively...

"The founders of our nation were nearly all Infidels, and that of the presidents who had thus far been elected not a one had professed a belief in Christianity...Among all our presidents from Washington downward, not one was a professor of religion, at least not of more than Unitarianism."

And finally, I will respond with several quotations directly from Washington's works, and again one that deals specifically with the subject of government and religion...

"I am persuaded, you will permit me to observe that the path of true piety is so plain as to require but little political direction. To this consideration we ought to ascribe the absence of any regulation, respecting religion, from the Magna-Charta of our country." ~ George Washington, Papers (1789), in response to the charge that the Constitution doesn't mention Jesus.

"Government being, among other purposes, instituted to protect the consciences of men from oppression, it certainly is the duty of Rulers, not only to abstain from it themselves, but according to their stations, to prevent it in others." ~ George Washington, letter to the Religious Society called the Quakers (1789)

And of course, my favorite Washington quote...

"The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support." ~ George Washington, letter to the congregation of Touro Synagogue (1790)

TTFN,
Blackout

-------------------------
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Progressive U community.

First off i already mentioned the importance of separation from church from state. I believe everyone has a freedom of opinion. If you do not want to accept the fact that Jesus Christ is your loving Savior, that is your own fault and I wish the best for you. My point about our government is the fact that there is relations between our government and the Bible, it is and always will be a standing fact. Christians are not evil. Some people seem to believe our ideas are meant to destruct rather than revive our country. I do not believe Christianity should govern our people. Being a Christian involves a personal relationship with God. You do not force religion on people. God is the one and only judge. My point on this subject was to voice my opinion on gay marriage. Not get into a political debate on specifics of our government. The point was to show that gay marriage is immoral. I do not agree with it. Gay people should not be able to sue churches for not marrying them. It does happen and it is ridiculous. Gay lifestyle should also not be taught in school. I do not want my children learning about a gay lifestyle. There parents should handle that. If it's illegal to teach a Christian lifestyle in school it should be illegal for schools to teach a gay lifestyle in schools. Gay marriage is just another immorality trying to push the buttons of Christian churches. Which is fine, whatever, it still does not make it right or acceptable. If it passes as a law through our government then i wish the best for those people. I will still not accept it in my life. I do not believe gay people are evil. I just believe they are everyone else and are making a mistake (or sin) in their life. I have friends who are gay (which is ironic because they do not believe gays should get married either). I don't hate them. I just think they make bad choices just like I do. Their choices will never effect my personal faith with God. I just will not accept an immorality as law. I will fight against it because that is just who I am and is my God given right as an American. As far as our Founding Father's go, you are right, many were deists. They still have a belief in God though, which helped them create our Constitution. Christianity and the Holy Bible are not a "Rule Book" to life. It is a "Guide Book" to life. I would say it is the best way to live your life, since becoming a recent Christian and being baptized. Christianity has thrived without the help of government. It is proven throughout the world. I do not mind criticism, I actually welcome it. Your ideas do not change mine and will not effect my relationship with God. You can post as many quotes or deny my religion or beliefs, but in the end i will tell you good luck and God Bless.

ediblewoman's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

First of all, I think Blackout knows he will not ever change the mind of a dogmatic Christian, but he will always argue for equality and rational thinking for the benefit of those who might want to hear a fair-minded argument.

And second, in response to your quote, "I do not want my children learning about a gay lifestyle." Well, then, I don't want MY kids, who live in a gay family to learn about a heterosexual lifestyle. You guys always get so hung up on the sex aspect of it, but a gay family's lifestyle is exactly the same as a heterosexual family's lifestyle: breakfast, school, after school programs/lessons.sports, homework, dinner together as a family, baths, and bedtime. Repeat. Throw in some parent volunteering at school, parent-teacher conferences, visits to the grandparents, playdates, etc. How is that gay lifestyle any different from a heterosexual lifestyle?

"Never go with a hippy to a second location."
~Jack Donaghy
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman

whispers awnesty's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

Us heterosexuals are dogmatic and judgmental and close minded people that argue till we are blue pointlessly. Oh, and we demand our children to be who we want them to be, not necesarily who they are.

Wait was that inappropriate;)

Love is like a box of chocolates; if you chose wisely you won’t be disappointed and have to spit it out. ~T

ediblewoman's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

:tongue:

"Never go with a hippy to a second location."
~Jack Donaghy
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman

A homosexual; lifestyle is against my morals and against a lot of people's morals. That is the difference. It is really that simple. It comes down to morals.

sawaboof's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

I think you missed the part where she clearly stated a homosexual lifestyle is exactly the same as a heterosexual lifestyle.

What you are morally opposed to is how penises don't enter vaginas and make babies. Don't worry. Only heterosexual sex and how not to have it is taught in schools.


"What a crazy random happenstance!"
Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog

Read my Blog!

ediblewoman's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

Why are you heterosexual people so hung up on sex?
:phbt:

"Never go with a hippy to a second location."
~Jack Donaghy
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman

sawaboof's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

well... I'm a blasphemous heathen who doesn't hold puritanical views about sex. I can't speak for everyone else though.


"What a crazy random happenstance!"
Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog

Read my Blog!

ediblewoman's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

That completely invalidates your opinion, doesn't it? ;)

"Never go with a hippy to a second location."
~Jack Donaghy
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman

whispers awnesty's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

Its the basis for our morals and lifestyle obviously. We get hung up on penises I guess (every disgusting pun intended)

Love is like a box of chocolates; if you chose wisely you won’t be disappointed and have to spit it out. ~T

whispers awnesty's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

I wish!

They do not even teach people how to have sex in big people school...Uh I mean college.

I would also think it neat to learn about how on earth Homosexuals have sex... or maybe that would be way to much information.

Not that I am way to focused on sex...I am just inquisitive (or nosey if you perfer)

Love is like a box of chocolates; if you chose wisely you won’t be disappointed and have to spit it out. ~T

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

...and out of my relationships, out of my contracts and out of my family's personal life.

Quote:

If you do not want to accept the fact that Jesus Christ is your loving Savior, that is your own fault and I wish the best for you. My point about our government is the fact that there is relations between our government and the Bible, it is and always will be a standing fact.

I think you have a funny idea about what constitutes a "fact." A "fact" is "a piece of information presented as having objective reality." Offering an unsupported assertion does not make something a "standing fact," regardless of how sincere, or in this case devout, the assertion might be.

Quote:

Christians are not evil.

Most christians aren't evil, I agree...but you do tend to be A) naive, B) judgmental, C) remarkably uniformed about the actual history of this country. I would also suggest there are certainly elements of christian theology which are "evil" (if you will pardon the pejorative) when closely examined, such as the aformentioned belief that it is okay to kill the infant children of your enemies if they don't do what you think your "god" wants them to do.

Quote:

Some people seem to believe our ideas are meant to destruct rather than revive our country.

I would suggest that pointing to things like "under god" in the Pledge and "in god we trust" on our money (not to mention the intensely religious movements to oppose the rights of gay citizens, to criminalize abortions, to put the 10 commandments in court houses, and to subsidize religious charities with government funds...just to name a few recently prevalent issues) actually provides significant evidence that one of the goals of the modern evangelical and catholic movements is very much to undermine the basic rights of conscience which our Founding Fathers worked so hard to protect in protect in our Constitution.

Quote:

I do not believe Christianity should govern our people. Being a Christian involves a personal relationship with God. You do not force religion on people. God is the one and only judge. My point on this subject was to voice my opinion on gay marriage. Not get into a political debate on specifics of our government. The point was to show that gay marriage is immoral.

Horsepuckey. Considering the clear manner in which you associate the idea of "morality" with your religion, this argument amounts to little more than a disingenuous canard. Unless you can defend this position without referring back to "morality" as it is defined by your religion (and I would submit that you cannot), then you ARE trying to force your religion on people when you try to deny them access to a basic civil right because your religion has decided that a group of citizens are "immoral."

Quote:

I do not agree with it. Gay people should not be able to sue churches for not marrying them. It does happen and it is ridiculous.

This accusation is spurious. There is absolutely no basis in the Laws of the United States or our Constitution that would be valid, and there has never been a case where a church in the U.S. has been sucessfully sued for refusing to perform a religious marriage ceremony for a same-sex couple. This same objection was raised in regards to interracial marriages when the Supreme Court ruled (in Loving v. Virginia (1967)) that it was unconstitutional do deny legal marriage to couples on the basis of their race. The claim was baseless then, and it is baseless now.

Quote:

Gay lifestyle should also not be taught in school.

What do you mean by "gay lifestyle?" I would suggest that there is nothing being taught about gay people in public schools today for which there is not similar material being discussed in a heterosexual context.

Quote:

I do not want my children learning about a gay lifestyle. There parents should handle that.

If that's your belief, then you should home-school your kids. PUBLIC schools, by definition, must be inclusive, and cannot be limited in their cirriculum just because some parents have an ideological objection to the subject matter.

Quote:

If it's illegal to teach a Christian lifestyle in school it should be illegal for schools to teach a gay lifestyle in schools.

Why? It is illegal to teach about "christian lifestyle" because our Constitution specifically forbids the government from respecting religious establishments. Non-religious subjects are not similarly burdened.

Quote:

Gay marriage is just another immorality trying to push the buttons of Christian churches.

With all due respect, this is the dumbest thing that you have said thus far. Contrary to the delusional conceit that EVERYTHING in the world revolves around the christian church, gay couples don't sit around exchanging maniacal "muahaha's" and plotting to use their relationships as a means of destroying your churches. Gay people want to get married for the same reasons that everyone else does...i.e we want to celebrate our love for one another and obtain the legal protections and benefits offered by marriage for our families.

Quote:

I have friends who are gay (which is ironic because they do not believe gays should get married either).

I hear this one a lot from anti-gay christians, but for the life of me I have never met an actual gay person who would support the idea that gay people should be prevented from obtaining a legal marriage. I suspect (but I don't know your friends, so...) that you are misinterpreting a common philosophy in the gay community that suggests legal document shouldn't be necessary in order to make a relationship meaningful. Many gay people would not choose to marry even if they could, just like many heterosexual couples do today. I think that a close cross-examination of your gay "friends" would reveal a similar point-of-view.

Quote:

I don't hate them.

But you would deny them access to a basic civil right. That might not be "hate," but it sure isn't "love."

Quote:

I will fight against it because that is just who I am and is my God given right as an American.

You can fight it all you like but unless you can come up with a non-religoius argument that supports your point-of-view, you will find your self frustrated at every turn by our Constitution.

Quote:

As far as our Founding Father's go, you are right, many were deists. They still have a belief in God though, which helped them create our Constitution.

I would suggest that the evidence points to our Constitution is based on the principles of The Enlightenment as framed by The Common Law. Our Founders were influenced just as much by the ancient society of the Greeks as

Quote:

Christianity and the Holy Bible are not a "Rule Book" to life. It is a "Guide Book" to life. I would say it is the best way to live your life, since becoming a recent Christian and being baptized. Christianity has thrived without the help of government. It is proven throughout the world. I do not mind criticism, I actually welcome it. Your ideas do not change mine and will not effect my relationship with God. You can post as many quotes or deny my religion or beliefs, but in the end i will tell you good luck and God Bless.

I am not interested in challenging the "relationship" between you and your imaginary friend. But, I AM interested in ensuring that the citizens of this country are not denied their basic civil rights simply because some people have a religious hang up about the lives of those citizens. And, ediblewoman has it right. This really isn't about YOU or ME. I don't have any illusions about being able to overcome the religious fervor that clouds the minds of religious fanatics, but those people do serve as an excellent springboard from which to inform and educate those whose minds are still free from the poison of religious zealotry.

TTFN,
Blackout

-------------------------
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Progressive U community.

sawaboof's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association
blackout wrote:

gay couples don't sit around exchanging maniacal "muahaha's"

:rofl:

sorry... I just pictured that in my head :-)


"What a crazy random happenstance!"
Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog

Read my Blog!

whispers awnesty's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

I have a question. You said "Most christians aren't evil, I agree...but you do tend to be A) naive, B) judgmental, C) remarkably uniformed about the actual history of this country." My question has to do with "C)" Is uniformed a typo? Are we christians remarkedly uniformed or uninformed?

Eh, Either way I take offense. I am christian and know the history of this country, the same with most all of the christian people my spouse and I hang with. Everytime I think to riot on someone and set them straight on their brainwashing there is a little Blackout beating me too it, so I just watch.

I guess its time to mention that wide sweeping generalizations will find a way to the few people it does not apply to and bother the living crap out of them.

Love is like a box of chocolates; if you chose wisely you won’t be disappointed and have to spit it out. ~T

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association
Quote:

Are we christians remarkedly uniformed or uninformed?

That would be "uninformed." I apologize for the typo.

Quote:

I am christian and know the history of this country, the same with most all of the christian people my spouse and I hang with.

That's why I said "most" and not "all." There are always exceptions to any rule, though I would suggest that whenever you find someone arguing for the perception that America was founded as a "christian nation," that they fall perfectly within the bounds of my criticism.

Quote:

I guess its time to mention that wide sweeping generalizations will find a way to the few people it does not apply to and bother the living crap out of them.

Well-informed people rarely bother me. In fact, on those rare occasions that I do run across a well-informed religious person, I tend to find the experience genuinely refresing.

TTFN,
Blackout
-------------------------
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Progressive U community.

Blackout. You will not ever be able to prove me wrong with my religion. Your opinion really means nothing to me. I hope you find God and know what living is all about. God Bless.

blackout's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

This really isn't about proving anything to YOU. Perhaps one day you will wake up and realize that you have been lied to (possibly after you do some REAL historical research), but until them I am content to use you as a convenient tool for demonstrating the basic irrational and uniformed basis of the opinions that you represent to OTHERS.

TTFN,
Blackout

P.S. Expecting others to prove your assertions "wrong" is a logical fallacy. When you make an assertion, the burden of proof lies with you, not your opponents.

-------------------------
Check out Progressive PRIDE, a Gay-Straight Alliance for the Progressive U community.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.