Just recently, I saw on TV a United States Post office commercial. The commercial talked about how the Post Office doesn't charge any extra for fuel charges, obviously in an attempt to gain business from companies who have rising fuel surcharges. At first, the commercial passed through one ear and out the other ear, like any other commercial. Then, it floated back into one of my ears suddenly awaking me to a horrible realization. At this point, I realized that the government takeover of business had gone too far. With the recent bailouts of multiple companies and the government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, socialism is creeping up on America. How can we have let the government get so far in taking a stake in business? This Post Office only confirmed the worst:
1) Without fuel surcharges, someone has to pay that money and the people that are going to pay for it are the taxpayers whose government runs the Post Office. But wait a second. If more customers are paying for the mailing of their letters without a fuel surcharge and are then paying for it in taxes, doesn't that seem like unnecessary stealing of business from other shipping companies like UPS and FedEx? This commercial symbolizes our government's new steps into taking a hold on business and that certainly was not what America was founded on.
2) It also came to my attention why the Post Office is another federal expense that should be cut. I think that the U.S. Post Office should be shutdown and rights for the mailing of letters should go to the other worthy private businesses that would be more than willing to gain that business without making the taxpayers pay for it in a never ending circle. Here, the small-government congressmen and women can make a stand against the growing government business involvement by ending the expense of the U.S. Post Office and thereby strengthening the shipping industry of our economy.
The Post Office Commercial Complex

By ksullivan - Posted on October 7th, 2008
Tagged: Government Intervention
• Effective government



The postal service is entirely funded by the sale of postage.
Here's an article about how they are handling the increase in energy costs:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92858127
A little research, please.
"Never go with a hippy to a second location."
~Jack Donaghy
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman
Good point, but I find it very hard to believe that the sale of postage stamps covers all those payroll and fuel expenses, especially when it's coming from NPR. Further, if the Post Office was cut and mail was opened up to private businesses, the stamp prices would easily come down saving the average person and large corporations a deal of money.
Government has no other end, but the preservation of property. - John Locke
especially when it's coming from NPR.
I trust NPR over someone's random opinion. What sources did you use for your own blog, if you would like me to believe that NPR is giving out wrong information?
"What a crazy random happenstance!"
Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog
Read my Blog!
My sources are both the Post Office commercial itself and the ideas of aour founding father Benjamin Franklin who successfully pushed the establishment of the United States Post Office.
(P.S. what the hek does "what a crazy random happenstance" mean?)
Government has no other end, but the preservation of property. - John Locke
The post office was recreated in 1970 to be a self-sufficient, government-approved monopoly in 1970. It has not used tax payer dollars in over twenty years.
And since NPR is too biased for you, I found that information (which I already knew, but I wouldn't expect you to believe me) at the USPS site, and in the Encyclopedia Britannica. Those may be biased as well--I'm sure the USPS site has a VERY pro-Post Office slant-- but they are better and more up to date than your opinion.
Knowledge is power, you know.
"Never go with a hippy to a second location."
~Jack Donaghy
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman