Ah, the Sweet Smell of Bigotry in the Courts....

Tagged:  •    •  

In English class, we were discussing possible discrimination in the courts on the basis of race, because we read To Kill a Mockingbird. I don't think that race counts against people as much as it used to. People are discriminated against in court on the basis of money, influence, and gender. Martha Stewart, for example, was found guilty of obstructing justice and lying to investigators while her male Enron counterparts are still being tried, to my knowledge. Martha paid time in a correctional facility and served home confinement, while Jeff Skilling and Ken Lay were only held to await their trial. Martha’s trial was executed rather quickly, and she served prison time, while the two men have only been indicted. This shows discrimination between the genders. No longer are people discriminated against by race in today’s courts, but by money and influence. O.J. Simpson’s double-murder trial was held in 1995. Simpson’s hair was found on both of the victims’ clothing, and his blood was found at the Bundy household, yet he was found to be not guilty. Although Simpson’s wife was one of the victims, he never put considerable effort into finding her killer. O.J. Simpson never testified at the trial, unlike most convicted felons believed to be innocent by the jury. Although Simpson is a black man, he is an affluent black man with many prominent friends. No longer would his statements be considered invalid simply because of his color. Rather, O.J. Simpson was acquitted of a double-murder because, arguably, he is a wealthy former-NFL star. This shows that courtroom bias is no longer based on skin color.

You missed the glaring racial disparities when it comes to the overall prison population, the sentencing disparities in cocaine laws, and the well documented racial bias in death penalty cases.

May I please live in your world where everyone is as rich as OJ Simpson, and can afford to hire the best defense attorney's money can buy, and where no sentencin disparities exist except those based on gender?

My Blog

"We cannot redeem evil, we must combat it." -- Jean Paul Sartre

whispers awnesty's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

I am not sure you can generalize the entire system based on a couple of high profile cases but hey it sounds almost like your right.

I am also not sure you can say that the system is biased just because most the prison population is one way.

WARNING: this next statement might sound racist but I do not mean it to. WARNING

Certain populations participate in more at risk behavior and thus become more suseptible to being punished.

Just my guesses,
~T
All truths are easy to understand once discovered; The point is to discover them ~Galileo

Are you arguing that Martha got a better deal because she's a woman or the opposite?

whispers awnesty's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

Looks to me like she got a worse deal because she is not a man according to what I read in this blog, but only a guess. If you ask me she got a worse deal because she was guilty and her lawyer was not as fabulous as the other guys'.
~T

All truths are easy to understand once discovered; The point is to discover them ~Galileo

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.