The government is targeting and controlling the minds of children in order to make itself seem flawless. They are attempting to erase the black mark of the Bush regime.
Have you seen the Disney Channel show "That's so Raven" lately?
No?
That's because it isn't there anymore.
It has been replaced by a show called "Corey in the House", in which Corey's (and Raven's) father (a chef) becomes the personal chef of the President of the United States, and the family moves into the White House.
Only, in this show, the President isn't Bush.
In fact, he is nothing like Bush.
He is a slightly silly yet honest and good-meaning man.
And he looks nice. Which appeals to kids.
Have you heard of Soulja Boy?
You've probably heard a couple of his songs.
Rap started as a form of expression. Rappers such as Tupac used rap to convey current and ongoing issues with emotion and sincerity. Rap was never meant to be a hookup ticket.
Soulja Boy is changing all that. His songs are full of empty, lustful, and yet only mildly obscene lyrics.
How did this guy get so popular, so fast anyway? It seems as if he erupted from nowhere.
The answer is simple: the best advertising agency is part of the government. The CPI (Commitee for Public Information) has been controlling the minds of Americans since WWI, through posters and songs alike.
Don't beleive it? Nobody would have beleived it during WWI. Today we know the fact of this matter: the government did hire musicians to produce and release an instant hit (like Crank that Soulja Boy) that was both catchy and effective in recruiting soldiers for the army.
The government is attempting to take the emotion out of rap in order to corrupt the minds of young minority groups in America who listen to rap music, as well as recruit them for the army.
The government, specifically, the CPI is paying Disney Channel and Soulja Boy to attempt to hold on to the minds of America's youth through popular media. It has definitely happened before, and it is definitely happening now.
I didn't think That's so Raven was that good of a show anyways. Anyways, she became really popular after Cheetah girls, and is now doing a lot more music rather than acting. A Disney show or movie about living in the White house is certainly not new, and the emphasis has never been on the President.
As for Soulja Boy, that song is popular because someone released a video on YouTube showing people how to do the dance, so now everyone knows the song and the dance. Do you have any statistics for new recruits and the popularity of the song mirroring each other? What lyrics specifically encourage listeners to sign on to the army?
Of course, the government has used Disney to further their own messages before, but those were pretty blatant. What you're talking about is very subtle, and I think you are reading too far into it.
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/tricia0711
they distracted an actor into a musical sideshow, in order to make room for a new show. She was getting old anyway, making her a perfect choice.
A Disney movie about living in the white house is definitely not new...but can you site any other shows? The advantage of putting it in a show instead of a movie uses the law of spaced repetition; information is learned if repeated periodically. Does it matter if the emphasis isn't on him? He's there in almost every single episode.
And as for Soulja Boy, putting something on the internet almost never makes it instantly famous. I was just a little concerned when he suddenly appeared in my younger brother's middle school dance, and everybody knew about him by the next week, although I had never heard of him before. There are no specific lyrics related to signing into the army, but they do talk a lot about sex-which many young people know relate with "cool". The linking of sex-cool-soulja boy makes the soldier-boy a much cooler thing to be.
As psychology advances, we discover how to turn subtleties into unconscious realities. We don't really know yet if subliminal messaging works.
So perhaps this is a test?
That's so Raven is still on Disney Channel in reruns. And no, I cannot think of any other shows about living with the president, but there are certainly a fair number of movies with that plot to make up for it. And most of the people who dislike Bush don't watch Corey in the House on a regular basis. Isn't the president a bit of an idiot? How would that help Bush's image? Especially when the re-election was already being discussed when this show aired.
The song is actually called "Crank that." Soulja boy is the stage name of the artist. And he really doesn't look like a soldier. And from what you say, the song is about sex, a common theme in music. Yes kids consider sex to be cool, but they also consider it dirty, or taboo. Youtube reaches millions of viewers, and people have been known to become very visible through this site.
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/tricia0711
I would like to see some evidence or sources as well. Did you come up with this on your own as a hypothetical scenario, or did you read somewhere that these agencies actually paid the Disney channel and Soulja Boy? If so, I would like to see a reference for these so I can check them out myself.
Click here to read about new ways to save money and the environment that you have never heard!
Yes, it's kind of hypothetical. But I feel there is something going on; nothing happens in coincidence.
No, those movies don't make up for the lack of shows. We see movies once to a few times in a lifetime, except if we're starwars kids. According to the law of spaced repetition, see reference for validity, we can not learn from singly-viewed movies nearly as well as ritually-viewed shows.
Lol, who do you think watches Disney Channel? Small children do not have any real opinion on the current President, and their parent's views probably don't have much to do with seemingly unrelated television shows. The people who will be writing the history books that carry on into the future will not be those who lived through the time.
According to a recent study (see bottom), we can change each other's memories to make things seem worse, or better. A subliminally better view on the President in history books would certainly help the GOP in the long run, would it not?
Government agencies do not release information to the media and public. They don't have to. Certain parts of The Warren Commission (see bottom) on JFK's assassination are still locked up They will be released 2017.
Many things do become visible through youtube, but why something so obscure as that? It's just another dance to just another rap song. Why isn't this video famous? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9rBi52_51o
And so, with these references and the power of abductive reasoning, I propose the aforementioned hypothesis. Bueno?
http://www.supermemo.com/english/ol/background.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2006/07/18/1688712.htm
http://politicalgame.blogspot.com/2007/11/tdih-warren-commission.html
Yes, it's kind of hypothetical. But I feel there is something going on; nothing happens in coincidence.
No, those movies don't make up for the lack of shows. We see movies once to a few times in a lifetime, except if we're starwars kids. According to the law of spaced repetition, see reference for validity, we can not learn from singly-viewed movies nearly as well as ritually-viewed shows.
Lol, who do you think watches Disney Channel? Small children do not have any real opinion on the current President, and their parent's views probably don't have much to do with seemingly unrelated television shows. The people who will be writing the history books that carry on into the future will not be those who lived through the time.
According to a recent study (see bottom), we can change each other's memories to make things seem worse, or better. A subliminally better view on the President in history books would certainly help the GOP in the long run, would it not?
Government agencies do not release information to the media and public. They don't have to. Certain parts of The Warren Commission (see bottom) on JFK's assassination are still locked up They will be released 2017.
Many things do become visible through youtube, but why something so obscure as that? It's just another dance to just another rap song. Why isn't this video famous? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9rBi52_51o
And so, with these references and the power of abductive reasoning, I propose the aforementioned hypothesis. Bueno?
http://www.supermemo.com/english/ol/background.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2006/07/18/1688712.htm
http://politicalgame.blogspot.com/2007/11/tdih-warren-commission.html
http://www.blogtoplist.com/rss/newt.html
http://www.blogtoplist.com/rss/newt.html
if anyone can sort through it!