Hilary Clinton should be deemed an ineffective leader. She should not recieve the democratic nomination. Who wears the pants in that family anyways? Obviously it's Bill and that is no crack at a woman being president. It just better not be this one.
Hilary is strong willed foe for Barack O'Bama. You can tell by watching their debates that she truly wants to win the election. But at what cost? She has already stepped up her game by making dirty campaigns against him. She has attacked him at the debates. She has even gone as far to post T.V. ads preplanned in her campaign. Ask yourself this one question, how can we elect a leader who can not even unite her own party let alone a country? The more attacks she makes on Barack the farther she slides in the race. Look at the recent results to prove it. Ten Straight and if she loses Texas and Ohio stick a fork in her because she will have been had.
Not only is her campaign awful but so are her plans. She wants to help illegal immigrants into the country and keep the ones we have here inorder to and I quote from her website " reunite the families." Yeah, you have the right idea Hilary you can't fix the problems you and Bill are having so bring in the aliens so you can play Dr.Phil with them. I like your thinking. Not to mention her health care plan. Who is to say that her plan passes and bums on the street who work at low income jobs get the same health care as someone who puts in 12 hour days at a real job. Now Hilary, what if I got to see the worlds best physician before you, inorder to be operated even though you were in worse condition than me. You would not let this happen just because the doctor feels bad for and your plan would cover yet that is the sacrifice you are asking millions of people to make.
While reading this keep in mind this is the same woman who let her husband run rampant with assistants. Who is to say that the only woman he was with was Monica. It was the only one he was caught with true but you know there were more. Not to mention this Bill repeatedlly denied it happening yet the American people know what happened. While facing the court Hillary was nowhere to be seen, just hanging out in the shadows I guess. She never spoke up against the hateful thing her husband did to her then, but instead let America decide for her. Is that the leader you want, someone who will hide in the shadows and let the majority of people's opinions form her own. Well, I thought leaders were supposed to be able to make the tough call but obviously Hillary must have a problem with Barack for that as well. He knows how to get where he wants and how to make the tough calls for the public good otherwise he would not be where he is at such a young age.
In conclusion I will leave you with one last thought. If Hillary wins the election who will be the one making the calls, her or Bill? And we all have seen Bill's judgement firsthand, and Hillary's response so I am sure you have no choice but to vote Barack.
These kind of personal attacks on Hillary Clinton won't convince anyone to vote for Barack Obama. And I say this as an Obama supporter. You do bring up great points about who will really lead the country if she becomes president... but whatever happens in their marriage is not anyone's business.
You may want to reconsider that what happens between them is no ones business. Let's just say that things happen in the white house again and Bill knowing all the information this time has sex with another woman. Say this woman is a spy and he tells her information inorder for her to have sex with him. An unlikely scenario but who would have foreseen 9-11. Also say she catches him cheating and is in a bad mood one day and in haste and anger signs a bill that passes through her office. Say her mindset in unstable and she doesn't read because she is too emotional or she just ignores her duties as she ignored the case against Bill. I think their marriage brought the way Hillary will respond to criticism and by respond I should say lack there of.
They've both been in public office when lots of scandals have plagued them. If the Clintons are one thing, they are competent-- and that unlikely scenario won't occur under them.
Just invoke September 11th 2001 as a reason why we couldn't have Bill Clinton as a Presidential spouse?
Also, your point is moot anyway since ex-Presidents are allowed daily CIA briefings if they want them. Perhaps that spy is already having a good time with Bill. Our national security is imperiled! Quick! Call your Senators!
My Blog
"We cannot redeem evil, we must combat it." -- Jean Paul Sartre
never said that he was invited to CIA briefings you impicated that yourself. What could occur is Hillary to her husband something crucial to our country's security and you have no idea because it is that bond between them. That bond in which he has already broken before. How can we trust Bill to keep his mouth shut and faithful to the country if he can not be faithful to his own wife.
Your title amuses me... but your blog lacks substance.
I have never supported personal attacks; although I strongly dislike Hilary, as a person as well as politically, I find this type of blog to be ineffective at reducing her chances of election.
Even I am not this rude:
You ruin it when you try too hard.
This post was extremely superficial, personal, and lacked insight.
You wrote:
"She wants to help illegal immigrants into the country and keep the ones we have here inorder to and I quote from her website " reunite the families." Yeah, you have the right idea Hilary you can't fix the problems you and Bill are having so bring in the aliens so you can play Dr.Phil with them."
Since when should a politician's personal life interfere with their public life? And what is so wrong about that plan? Illegal immigrants who have children that are natural citizens should be able to be with their families, instead of separated by borders. How would you feel if you could not live with family or friends all your life? Do you really think these "aliens" are objects devoid of human feeling or being? This argument is completely unsupported.
And what does her husband's actions have anything to do with hers? She and her husband are separate people.
As for health care, how dare you discriminate against a "bum on the street" when usually those people without homes are experiencing mental/drug/physical illnesses that put them there. Maybe with universal health care, they can get off the street.
Sincerely,
Lourdes Vera
Seperated families do occur and they are tragic but most of the time, if one is a legal citizen and the parents are not, it is because the birthmother snuck across the boarder and delivered the baby here. This happens frequently yes, but why does it happen. Let me tell you that the illegals have to get first priority treatment because if the U.S. puts our people first and ignores a dying alien the world will view us a selfish and barbaric. So, these illegals that sneak over and get injured or sick often get better treatment the average americans. And not only do they recieve the gift of treatment they get it for free. It is the U.S. tax dollars that have to pay for it, because the aliens have little or no money when they get here, so they get our doctors treatment for free in essence. When speaking of her healthcare plan how can you defend a bum who may or may not have mental problems, you nor I can be certain, getting first rate health care before someone who say works 12 hour days at a job, pays for good insurance, and feeds and provides their family. Does the bum who will not get a job, but instead CHOSES to beg for money and food really deserve health care before someone else and at that rate equal health care. I most certainly think not.
Actually the US tax dollars do NOT pay for it... not technically.
The law that forces hospitals to cover people no matter what in the case of emergency does not allow for the allotment of tax dollars to cover the expense. Which is why as many as 10 hospitals in California are already bankrupt because of illegals using them for free health care.
"Anchor babies" are a whole other issue that I'm not going to bother tackling here.
By posting this you are upholding the fall of American marriages. This is the reason for so many failed marriages. You, along with most of the country, that a woman should rule the household and the man should be "under her power" that's not the way it works and that's not the way any successful marriage will work. Whether they want to admit it or not, most women must be nurtured and taken care of. The man was designed to be the head of the household and the provider of his family. I do agree with you about the fact that Bill may end up really running the country but we all know who ran the country during most of his term...so. Technically she cannot "control" her husband and has no right to.
So then, what you are saying is because "most women must be nurtured and taken care of " we should give Hillary a free pass when she makes mistakes. We should forgive her since she is a woman and needs to be nurtured. Wow, this is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. So if she makes a mistake we should just let is slide cause we wouldn't want to hurt her feelings. Do we as a country then need to nurture and lead her. Or should we just the leave Bill to do that, since we all know how he nurtures and takes of women? And since " The man was designed to be the head of the household and the provider of his family " how can we rely on someone by your logic who has relied upon Bill to control her. So if she wins the election you are straight out saying Bill will be involved with the decisions and know everything that goes on, so that way he can " nurture her and run the household ", right? I think you better rethink what you are trying to say.
I'll try to be nice here, I really will. There are a few points I would like to make:
1) Don't talk about her issues, you obviously don't know anything about them.
2) Don't say she can't control her household. I'm sure she didn't know her husband planned on sleeping around. She could have left Bill, but she didn't. She loves him, and until you are married for as long and they have been don't make a judgment on what you would do if you were in her situation.
3) To you little scenario, I hope you aren't serious. The same thing could happen to Obama or McCain. Don't assume because Hillary is a woman, that she can't handle the stress of the job.
4) Lastly, Bill isn't running to be president. He won't ever be president again. If you haven't noticed, ( beside the whole intern thing) he did a damn good job.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nominate your favorite blogger!
Check out the Topic of the Week!
I never said Bill did not do a good job. I am questioning his morals and ethics and how he treats people, including his wife. My little scenario could happen, becuase what kind of man are you if you sleep around while in the white house. On top of that because no one is there with him in the bedroom while they had sex, no one can say what they talked about. About Hillary and why I shouldn't care if she controls her husband, if she can not tell whether or not the man she married, loves whole heartedly as pointed that she did not leave him, the man she has lived her life with for however long, is cheating on her, how can we the american people really feel like she could cut off a terroristic threat or plan when she can not identify problems within her own household?