America Is Being DUPED

rjchase3's picture
Tagged:  •    •    •    •    •    •    •    •    •  

America is being DUPED

Robert J. Chase

 

Right now I am bewildered; I have been duped. The worst part is I truly felt that I had been supporting and planning to enter into a field that has been setup to dupe the American public. I shall not concede the fact that Hydrogen is better than gasoline; it most definitely is. The problem is the automotive industry has conned us ‘green’ citizens into thinking that hydrogen is the ONLY alternative.

            For years I have been championing alternative fuels. I may be young, but I certainly don’t think that I am stupid. It should be obvious to every American that there is a problem which the world needs to address. The world is overly dependant on oil from deep down in the earth’s core. This fuel is very dirty and creates a large percentage of the pollution in the air in our urban centers of civilization. Everyone knows this fact and knows there needs to be something done; the problem is no one has forced a change. The only institution that has even tried was the C.A.R.B institution which challenged the auto industry. The problem with this institution is they laid down when the car companies challenged them in court. The CARB regulations have set regulations on the type of vehicles that could be sold in the state of California. These regulations stated that a certain number of vehicles had to be electric vehicles; or in other terms have no emissions. All of the major car companies had engineered and created cars that would make it possible to meet these regulations, but they decided it wasn’t profitable enough; the programs were killed along with the legislation. Ever since the auto industry has championed fuel cell technology, and I bought into it. Fuel cell technology can be a great technology, and has a great amount of potential.

            I am an engineering student at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute studying Materials Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. The number one reason I chose to go to RPI is the fact that there is a Fuel Cell development center. I have been looking into going into the field to work directly with fuel cells. Though after further investigation, along with viewing the documentary Who Killed The Electric Car I am greatly worried. Is this new interest in hydrogen technology another ploy simply to stall any progress when it comes to Americans and their oil dependence? Until recently I hadn’t questioned the drive by the automakers to publicize their hydrogen research. I had been in the back of my mind hoping that one day maybe I would work in the GM Fuel Cell division, but right now I’m questioning whether I should put my faith in a company that has gone through similar motions before simply to give dedicated people the boot for better profits.

The EV1 was a revolutionary car, which barely anyone ever knew about. I’m a very conscientious person when it comes to automotive technology, yet even I had not known of this program by GM where they had a whole fleet of pure electric vehicles which were a perfectly viable solution to our dilemma. This fleet was destroyed because GM didn’t want to mass produce them, and they were able to defeat the regulations set by CARB. All of the people who had put their heart and soul into designing this vehicle were discarded. Will they do this again with fuel cells? They have been saying for a decade or two now that fuel cells will be available in a decade or two. Well guess what they are still singing the same tune. I personally feel like I have been duped.

I am in an uncomfortable position; do I continue my path towards fuel cells, or should I find myself another route? I without a doubt want to be involved in creating cleaner technology, but am I willing to work my heart to death on a second viable solution to see my work killed because of profits? My dreams may be killed for the moment, but I’m hoping that I can find my own way into the auto industry and have the ability to change the way they treat clean technologies.

dragonclaw
There is a lot of information out there. But that's all it is right now information. When it comes to Profit or clean air or clean fuel for that profit will always win. This is the way of business. Big time corp.'s will always put profit first. Unless they had no other option. Even when it comes to regulations (laws) and compliance big corparation rather pay fines to EPA then update there machines or change the type of raw matierals that they use. It is not only technology that needs to change but the way the we and corpate America thinks. Yes I would love to have cleaner air and cleaner fuel to use in my vechile or a vechile that did not emit harmful polution.

Remeber "If you build it, they will come?" Your blog makes it sound as though you have a passion and that you are very knowledgeable about your passion. Do not allow it to change because of fear that your voice will not be important. Attempt to make your voice heard. If you have the possibilty to become part of the GM Fuel Cell division, you can use that oppurtunity to show them it would be a BAD IDEA to just let it go. Develop away to show them it can be green! The american people are TIRED of the money we are giving to the oil companies for transportation. I myself however can not afford a any of the alternate vehicles because their is not very many of them. Mass production of these vehicles would not only allow for them to be less expensive, but if GM gets a jump on this it can mean large profits for them if the other automotive industries are not prepared.

Don't give up. You have not been duped-you have been motivated to cause change!

Robert, you are right about the hydrogen hype. Compressed natural gas vehicles were also hyped, built, sold, then abandoned by Big Auto. Electric vehicles (EVs) got the same treatment, except that the makers wouldn't sell them (six of the eight models were never offered for sale.)

GM's announcements about new hybrids and now even plug-in hybrids may (if followed by development, mass production and good marketing) redeem its green credentials. GM debuted the 'Impact' (which became the EV1) in January of 1990; CARB called its bluff nine months later. Ever since, GM, other automakers and the oil industry have been doing anti-EV and anti-cleaner-car lobbying and lawsuits.

Tesla, Phoenix and Commuter Cars already market highway-capable EVs. Mitsubishi and Subaru will sell EVs in 2010, followed by Nissan 'early next decade.' Safe and powerful lithium batteries are in test vehicles now, propelling them 200 to 300 miles per charge. EVs are coming.

Zero emission, oil-free EVs will win in the market, once the economies of mass production drive down their costs to build. Further, the cleaner our electric grid becomes, the closer to truly zero emission they will come, even counting fuelmaking.

rjchase3's picture

I was a bit worried when I wrote this blog; you know the whole holy crap what if all this money I'm spending on college goes down the tubes because I'm foolishly playing into their hands sort of worrying. Well my first reaction wasn't the most logical, but it still worries me. Though I'm not gonna let them win, I've been in the progress of creating a club at RPI to bring people together to build fuel cell operated machinery and spread knowledge about alternative fuels. I'm not going to give up my fight, but I do it now atleast with the knowledge that its possible my work could be wasted by the auto industry. Though I truly believe that Americans will see through the fog created by the ney sayer's and some day we will get to see mass produced 'green' vehicles and the spread of green technology throughout our society.
*------------------------*
ipsa scientia potesta est

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.