High costs low prices: Why Wal-Mart should not be supported

Tagged:  •    •    •    •    •    •    •    •  

When most people picture prison, they don’t see endless shelves of food, clothing, toys, cleaning products, and other basic household goods, but for almost two hundred and fifty immigrants locked overnight in a Wal-Mart this was the case.Though extreme, this is consistent with the Wal-Mart corporations focus on money over people, the workers were shut in to do janitorial duties off the clock. In California there are 167 Wal-Marts, 35 Sam’s Club’s and 9 distribution centers, who knows how many people were exploited to keep these stores running. Wal-Mart’s corrupt corporate culture and unfair labor relations should not be supported.

Wal-Mart Inc. is the worlds largest retailer, setting the national and international standards for the corporate industry... According to the documentary , Wal-Mart : The High Cost of Low Price, directed by Robert Greenwald, the five members of the Walton family are worth approximately eighteen billion dollars a year each, yet...Only one percent of their total wealth is donated to charitable funds, Bill Gates donates fifty-eight percent. If five of the ten wealthiest American’s don’t support charitable causes, will the next generation of corporate executives follow in their footsteps? Likewise, Wal-Mart employees donate more than their significantly wealthier employers. Employees donated five million dollars to the Critical Need Fund, established to aid fellow Wal-Mart employees in times of crisis, the Walton family donated six thousand. If representatives of a company as wealthy as Wal-Mart cannot demonstrate philanthropic behavior, their business is not worth monetary support.

The corporation’s stance on safety and security, as well as their actions to prevent it, are extremely dangerous... Eighty percent of crimes at Wal-Mart occur in the parking lots, and an unintentionally released crime report conducted by the Wal-Mart corporation discovered a way to completely eliminate parking lot crimes, at a relatively low price, but they illegally withheld this information. Rapes, murders, abductions, could be completely eliminated in these expansive parking lots, yet this greedy company has chosen not to care for it’s number one priority, the customer.If the most powerful corporation’s policy places finances over employee and customer welfare, what kind of a message is being sent to other businesses around the world?

Wal-Mart Inc. has done very little to support the average employee, and has participated in some exceptionally careless labor practices... According to wakeupwalmart.com, in 2004 Wal-Mart Inc. spent 1.5 billion dollars on healthcare, and 1.4 billion dollars on advertising, an accurate depiction of the company’s emphasis on healthcare. Clearly, image and revenue is as important as the health and well being of the employees.Because a significant number of employees cannot afford the healthcare system created by the company, they are encouraged to go on welfare, managers are supplied with local welfare agencies by the corporation. The amount of Wal-Mart employees relying on welfare costs taxpayers 1.5 billion dollars nationally, and eighty six billion dollars in California. Wal-Mart would rather have the average citizen, who’s money they are allegedly saving, cover the health expenses of their workers.To lower costs, Wal-Mart has purposely not supplied it’s stores with enough money to hire an adequate amount of workers. This has resulted in store managers using whatever means necessary to get all tasks taken care of. In 2003 one store was found guilty of hiring illegal immigrants, and locking them in over night to do janitorial work. This is an extreme example of the pressure managers are under to cut labor costs.

On walmartfacts.com, the company claims that, "They might be right for some companies but there is simply no need for a third party to come between our associates and their managers," in regard to unions. This is the lighter version of their dislike for unions, a system created to protect the American working man. The anti-union package at each store costs seven thousand dollars, more then they spend on security. In addition, there is a twenty-four hour anti-union hotline and rapid response team with a corporate jet which costs over seven million dollars. This sizable anti-union program directly contrasts their claim that they are not anti-union. Also, it shows that the company is well aware of it’s questionable business practices, since the amount of money it spends to protect their image is excessive.  Though Wal-Mart contends that there main priority is to deliver low costs to their consumer, they have done so by exploiting the very people in which they claim to help.

One hundred and seventy six million people shop at Wal Mart every week. The top reason people shop at Wal-Mart is the low prices, something few companies can compete with. Regular Wal-Mart shopper Kelly King stated " It is the employees choice to work there," a common argument amongst shoppers. Many argue that since there has been so much negative media concerning the company Wal-Mart has taken steps to improve their corporation. Studies have shown the average amount of money saved shopping at Wal-Mart does not balance out the public expense. Also, many employees work there because it is their only option, and because they work their they can only afford to shop there. Much of Wal-Mart’s defense for it’s actions is ineffectual. Since the negative press surrounding their healthcare system was so great they have created less expensive healthcare plan. Yet this decrease in costs of the healthcare detracts from an increase in costs of premiums, which are between one thousand and three thousand dollars.

To prevent the dominance of Wal-Mart’s corrupt corporate culture and unfair labor relations support for their company should be eliminated. A company that places finances over employee and customer care does not deserve support. A company that’s image outweighs the basic freedoms of our constitution does not deserve support. A company that is extremely wealthy but donates very little does not deserve support. We must be stronger than low prices and stop Wal-Marts monopolization of the public, industry and economy.

0
No votes yet
embryowassup's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

If I'm not mistaken, I believe Wal-Mart is a franchise, meaning that the issue would rest with the individual store rather than the corporation as a whole.

--Mike

Check out the ProgU News Feed:
http://www.progressiveu.org/news

kfed's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

I hate using Wikipedia for this sort of thing, but they make no reference to Wal-Mart being a franchise. Neither does wakeupwalmart.com. And Wal-Mart's main competitors are Target and Kmart, which I believe are also private corporations rather than corporate franchises.

The distinction is in the corporate management structure- a franchise sells the licenses to its trademarks, products, and marketing products, whereas in a corporate chain, everything operates from the top down with managers in each location to take care of day-to-day operations.

I don't think any one business owner could afford the licensing fees or transportation/operating costs to buy his/her own Wal-Mart franchise.

It's still totally evil either way, though.

embryowassup's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

I got the info from Walmart.com. Here's the link: http://walmartstores.com/GlobalWMStoresWeb/navigate.do?catg=314&contId=3...

They mention it in passing, but regardless, I can't imagine an executive order coming from corporate HQ to do something like this. Regardless of how the business is run, that's the manager's responsibility.

--Mike

Check out the ProgU News Feed:
http://www.progressiveu.org/news

I have shopped at Walmart for years, and will continue to do so, because of their prices. And you can find EVERYTHING there.

It's all about personal choice. If Walmart was so horrible to work for, why do people continue to work there? There isn't a lack of low-wage jobs anywhere you go. I look around my community and see 'Help Wanted' signs everywhere. My mother works at a Walmart, and has never once complained of being treated poorly or any of the things that you talk about in your blog. Have you ever actually spoken with employees, or did you just gather all of your information off of anti-Walmart websites?

We live in a free country, and are free to do whatever we choose with the money that we earn. If we choose to keep all of our earnings, no matter how much or little we make, so what? Should you want to give money? Maybe. But, who decides that? Why should you decide that the owners of Walmart are wrong for wanting to keep the money that they earned?

No, Mike, Wal-Mart is not a franchise. It's a corporation. You can't contact Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and buy the ability to open a store that you manage and run in the city of your choice.

As for this blog - if the author is going to present information as fact, they need to tell us where to find the information they're posting. Otherwise this blog is simply an opnion piece and, therefore, lacks credibility.

I'd be interested to know where you got a lot of the information you provide. For example, the $18 Billion number for the annual income of the Walton family members. Another blog(1) (also uncited, so who knows where THEY got their info...) states that each of the Walton family members have an income of $175 million annually. In addition, that article states that Helen Walton's total worth is about $15 billion. If they're making $18 billion a year, one would have to guess she's got quite a spending habit.

I also question comments you make like "an unintentionally released crime report conducted by the Wal-Mart corporation discovered a way to completely eliminate parking lot crimes, at a relatively low price, but they illegally withheld this information." Where did you get this info? It's not logical - since having a completely safe parking area would ATTRACT customers and increase sales. Also, how is it illegal to withold information on a study they did for internal purposes?

This one, "Studies have shown the average amount of money saved shopping at Wal-Mart does not balance out the public expense." doesn't have any link to where these studies can be found. And, "detracts from an increase in costs of premiums, which are between one thousand and three thousand dollars." doesn't give us info on where you found the premium numbers either.

To say things like "If representatives of a company as wealthy as Wal-Mart cannot demonstrate philanthropic behavior..." is just laughable. There is no moral dictate that says how much money a person needs to give in order to demonstrate philanthropic behavior.

I looked at the Walton Family Foundation site(2) and found that in 2005 they made grants of $133.6 million. On the corporate side, The Wal-Mart Foundation gave $246 million.(3)If you are saying that the hundreds of millions of dollars they give through their foundation, their corporate entity, not to mention the personal giving of the family members, doesn't qualify them as philanthropic leaders, you're just giving yourself away as a simple Wal-Mart basher grasping at straws. How much of YOUR annual income do you give to charity?

Finally, "the [number] of Wal-Mart employees relying on welfare costs taxpayers 1.5 billion dollars nationally" not only doesn't cite your source - again - but it also makes it sound as though these employees would have access to better benefits and wages in other jobs were it not for Wal-Mart sucking them into their web of deceit. What you're missing is that in many, many of the towns where Wal-Mart has a presence there is not much else in the way of employment opportunities available to the local citizenry. If they are not able to get jobs anywhere other than Wal-Mart, my guess is that they would be on welfare even if they were not employed at the "evil empire".

I'm all for flooding the internet with your opinions - but just make sure you are responsible and frame your comments correctly - as opinions. If you want to be taken seriously by anyone other than other Wal-Mart Haters, you have to support your statements.

(1) http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:0O8PxNPM-rgJ:www.classism.org/articl...
(2) www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org
(3) http://walmartstores.com/Files/2005_Charitable_Giving.pdf

Sorry, the figure is referring to how much they are worth, I did this for a school project and that didn't come to my attention until the night before when I was practicing it(it's meant to be a speech), so the note was made on the page.

here are my sources...
I haven't fully read the last comment, it was a little lengthy but I will address it all at some point.

Bibliography

King, Kelly. Written interview. 6 February 2007.

"Wal-Mart Facts." Wal-Mart Facts. 6 Feb. 2007. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 6 Feb. 2007 .

Wal Mart: The High Cost of Low Price. Dir. Robert Greenwald. DVD. Brave New Films, 2005.

"Wake Up Wal-Mart." Wake Up Wal-Mart. 8 Feb. 2007. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union. 8 Feb. 2007 .

***Note: The Wal-Mart facts website was created by Wal-Mart to quell negative press surrounding the corporation.

Thanks for the reads!

I don't have an income, I am 16, and have recently become employed...

I believe the movie I list addresses where the Walton donations go, and the film came out two years ago, so they could be improving.

Unfortunatley my project had a length limit, so I had to take out a lot of other information against Wal-Mart.

But, the jobs they do provide are for many of the people who they put out of business.

Please read the newsweek link, it demonstrates their priorities very clearly.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.