I want to have a rabid, bra-burning, Lavender Menace Feminist Moment. Right now, Right here, Get the kerosene ready and the kindling out.
Let me preface with what brought this on.
I have a weight and a strength problem; too much of one and not enough of the other. So when my family walked into Academy, I went off to go look at those wrist and ankle weights that strap on.
Oh-my-living-daylights, they were expensive, so to quell my hysterical wallet, I went to look at light barbells to see if they were worth considering. I grabbed two 5 lb. weights and went off to locate my parents. My mom expressed concern that 10 lb. was too much weight to start out with (I might mention here that Dad didn't think that until Mom said it) because I would get muscles instead of lose weight.
I added that I wouldn't mind being stronger and she returns with "you should use less weight because you're a girl".
At this point I was thrown off a little bit, but I wasn't angry, because it was unusual for my mother to back up anything with 'because you're a girl'.
Then I showed them the exorbitant ankle and wrist weights and tried to explain that the barbells were cheaper. (This argument is a good one with Dad :) ) There were some of the weight brands that went higher (weightier), but most were 5 lbs (together) or below), so I was hinting towards the adjustable set that builds up to ten pounds. At some point in the conversation, pointing to a 5lb pair, my mother says "You should buy these because they have pictures of women on them.".
The only responses I could think of at the time included deletion-encouraged expletives, so I covered with "forget it, never mind" and put the barbells back that I had been carrying around the whole time.
Now, you have to know where my mom was coming from. She’s afraid that I’m a man-hating lesbian (neither part true) and that I’ll never have grandchildren (an extremely valid fear) and that I’ll never get married (right now, I hope not) and live a miserable life. (*sigh*) I love my mother, but because she has a wonderful marriage and likes children now, she thinks that I will too, if she pushes it enough.
However, throwing back to the fifties and saying I should buy something because it has pictures of women on it …
I’m floored. I’m speechless, I’m shocked, vehement, and I feel betrayed. My own mother, the most fervent supporter of equality I know, telling me that I should buy weights that weigh less because I’m a girl, therefore implying that obviously women cannot be as strong as men. If I try to express my feelings further, I fear it shall devolve into a session of making the air blue.
I think that the important thing to draw from this is that we need to be careful to monitor what we are enforcing, especially to children, even with small comments. I think that a lot of the time, we forget and tell a joke or make a comment that reinforces stereotypes or dehumanizes others without realizing what’s going on.
How many romantic comedies feature a gay couple as the main characters rather than as comic relief? Why would that situation be terribly awkward for many people?
Because mainstream America doesn’t relate to gays as they would a straight couple. They have carefully made gays and lesbians a separate group from themselves. They are ‘others’. Personally, I think that a movie like this should be made. (There is a romance that I know of between two lesbians, but it was sad. My Summer of Love.) Instead, we’re getting a movie called “Satan’s Abby” which I secretly and fervently hope crashes and burns so hard as to end in severe debt for all,( yes even McGuire). I’m not sure yet, but I think I might protest its being at any theatre in our town. (Oh and btw, Kudos to Hallmark for producing Gay Marriage Congrats cards. They have done a very progressive thing.)
Carlos Mencia (Yes, yes, I know. I’m bringing who into this argument?) says that if he can’t tell a joke in front the people it makes fun of, then he doesn’t tell it at all. Most of his jokes show how silly stereotypes are anyway. Though he shies away from going any further, he still could be making a difference, and I like that.
But back to the point. If we would accept each other and help each other overcome that urge to conform, to push others out of our little worlds, to make them less than human and not worthy of respect, If we would instead, seek others to bring into our worlds, I think that we would grow as a society through being exposed to a multitude of different opinions. I’m sure that our foreign policy would benefit.
On the other hand, we also have to be careful about what we accept. Honestly, I just don’t think any kind of intolerance should be accepted because it’s against the central tenant, the spirit, of the idea of acceptance. We can’t pat a raving racist on the head and say “oh, that’s just his opinion”. We need to stand up to them and say what is unacceptable when we see it, or try to understand where that person is coming from and judge if, indeed, it some twisted way, the opinion has sense (such as an anarchist in America, which I have never understood.) or doesn’t.
The problem lies in that acceptability is determined by morality, which is a highly variable code to go by. But perhaps if enough of us spurn intolerance, it will retreat into isolated pockets and no longer plague many people who are simply unique. They will have much to share us when they are without fear of hateful backlash.




My issue with a lot of feminists (on the left) or perhaps members of the religious right (notice the fair and bipartisan criticism!) is that they can be too sensitive. I am telling you perhaps you too are sensitive? Well, perhaps a little.
Now wait just a minute... how did you react to that statement? Where you outraged? If so, then yes, I would say you're a little sensitive. If no, then I will take back my comment that you were being sensitive.
It's a simple biological phenomenon that the average man is typically physically stronger than the average woman. I don't think that's a sexist comment, it's a true medical statement. It's like saying the average man grows more facial hair than the average woman. There's nothing sexist about that - simply a natural difference between the sexes. Besides, the fact that men are mostly stronger than women certainly doesn't mean women are therefore inferior to men. We live in a society that values intellect over brute strength, anyway. So, why should that matter?
Here comes the Devil's Advocate: Is your rejection of intolerance in itself intolerant? Should a true advocate of tolerance therefore tolerate the intolerant? (Say that five times fast…)
The fact that men typically have more upper body strength than women was not the point I was protesting. I was "outraged" because the implication was that I couldn't possibly lift the weights that were heavier because they were intended for males. I am, though, particularly sensitive to being identified as female. She may having been saying something completely different (such as " you're weak because you don't exercise so you should start off small so that you don't hurt yourself") but what I heard was " stop trying to be a man ".
Man and woman are defined socially. A person is born male or female, but, as they mature, the society they live in teaches them gender roles, i.e. what they should or should not do based on their sex to be accepted. When people cross gender roles, say a man being very concerned with his appearance or a woman playing football, others around them may pressure them to stop the behavior. What it comes down to then, is that there are no behaviors that are only masculine or only feminine, but just behaviors.
What made me angry then, was that my mother was trying to enforce these imaginary gender roles on me for no good reason and without even a good side argument for why I should buy the lighter weights.
As for your Devil's Advocate: Any lover of acceptance could not abide by an instance of unacceptance. Instead, they would try to 'help' the 'unacceptor' to understand what they hate. The problem there comes in when we try to determine at what point fighting intolerance stops and pushing a particular point of view begins.
____________
haHA!
To be honest, your mother is right to an extent (although her reasoning is all fucked up). Getting bigger weights will mostly just build muscle (granted when you're talking the difference between a 5 and 10 lb. weight, it doesn't make much difference). If your goal is to lose weight, you probably want to do more cardio than lifting. Running, swimming or (my personal favorite) the rowing machine will help you not only lose weight, but condition your body to keep it off by being able to burn more calories per day.
Maybe a gym membership with a personal trainer might be a good investment.
--Mike
I was intending to use the weights for cardio, i.e. walking about for 30 minutes with the weights on my wrists and ankles.
But it doesn't matter to me whether I get rid of adipose tissue by losing weight or building muscle, I just want it gone.
I would have been fine with just about any other explanation for why I needed less weight than the one she gave about 'being a girl'.
____________
haHA!
When you lift weights it burns fat and you gain muscle. You then lose weight. I understand the higher the weight the bulker a person gets. When most woman want to look toned and not like Arnold. My arms look like Arnold. Lol. I lifted way to much weight at work. My muscles are bigger than some guys. They were really flabby though, and now they aren't. So i have gained one thing.
Start off small, then work your way up. Once you find weights that work well then stick with those.
I understand your frustration though, and it could be annoying.
Sorry to disappoint you, but I am voting for Lewis Black.
DrifterDani~