As the Bush saga comes to a close I can not help but look forward with a sense of optimism. Yes, we may have several environmental, economic, and assorted other crises, but Bush leaving has to be the silver lining to those dark clouds. Unfortunately this surge in enthusiasm hits a brick wall with every headline that features our Presidential candidates. It is a problem that has developed over the past several years and it has reached a critical point. The candidates are so far removed from the problems and issues of the average American that it seems highly unlikely anything will be be done to help us. Even when they trip and fall face first over an issue that matters, the politics of this race is something akin to appeasement, with each side trying to grab the most voters even if it means changing policies and contradicting other statements. And while that has always been a part of the political game, we need something more from our elected leaders. We need someone who can restore some faith in Washington, heal some of its ailments, and get the job done and not dance their way around the issue. I hope the candidates are up to the challenge, because I still see more of the same.
Is this really the best we have?
By jthouse1928 - Posted on August 14th, 2008
Tagged: 2008
• Party Politics
• Politicians
• politics
• Shared responsibility
• Effective government
• Better future



I agree. While I don't hate Bush with the fiery passion that many do, I'm ready for a new face in the Whitehouse. But a lot of the political problems in Washington are largely ignored by the media and the candidates. These problems aren't even necessarily Bush's fault: the power of lobbyists, corruption, mismanagement of the bureaucracy, etc. Our new president needs to address these issues first, the invisible, behind-the-curtains politics of Washington.
I was watching a History Channel special about the Spartans, and it said that when a ruler's rule ended, he had to answere to all these charges over his rule. It was compared to a President being impeached when his term came to an end.
I will leave my opinions about Bush out of this completely, but could you imagine if we really did impeach every president when his term ended? I think there is a lot to be gained by this, however perhaps not enough to accuse the president of all his charges over eight years instead of just moving on.
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/tricia0711