To be, or not to be a feminist? I've blogged about this before, but recently I've had to yet again reconsider my position. This is no doubt because I've been consumed lately with the idea of sex work. From writing a research paper about prostitution in Mississippi to wrap up my last undergrad semester, to perusing pleasure reading since graduation about the Dancing Girls of Lahore and an escort in San Francisco, I've had many perspectives to consider.
FRAMING SEX WORK AS A FEMINIST ISSUE
I’m taking the position that sex work is, indeed, a feminist issue. While I realize that men, too, participate in sex work and that it affects those men’s lives in very real and profound ways, I’m convinced that male sex workers are a minority in the global sex trade, and that males’ lives have not historically been as shaped by their sexual value as have the lives of females. Males have historically been afforded more avenues of achieving success in any given society, while women, in the absence of other means of subsistence, are more often left to rely upon their sexuality as their sole agency for survival.
If anyone has any evidence to offer that might convince me that sex work should not be framed as a feminist issue, please do share.
THE OWNERSHIP OF FEMALE SEXUALITY
Historically, women’s sexuality was not their own; ownership of female sexuality reverted to a male relative or husband. Throughout history proper, some form of femme covert or another has existed, which consistently included a woman’s sexuality as a part and parcel of her legal identity. That is, the male with the most immediate interest in a woman’s procreative activity – which will not always be one man; that will change as a girl grows into a woman and her marital status changes through divorce or death – exerted the most direct influence over her life course.
This is, of course, a phenomenon which primarily affects upper class women. The sexuality of women of the lower rungs of society, those who have already been ascribed a deviant label by virtue of their poverty, is less valuable, freeing such women to flout the dominant society’s moral dictates, and take ownership of their own sexuality in order to exploit it economically as a means of survival.
THE COMMODIFICATION OF FEMALE SEXUALITY
Since the very earliest literate societies, women’s sexuality has been commodified by the dominant patriarchal society. This is a pattern that has had millenniums to become etched into human society, and which we have only recently begun to question. Women's exploitation via their participation in sex work is but one manifestation of a primordial control-mechanism of the patriarchy, but a telling one indeed.
It is because of the realization of this truth that I have lately been questioning my hesitancy to embrace the feminist label.
More ruminations to come.
In the meanwhile please share your thoughts...




I think it is feminism. They are taking charge any way they can and utilizing what they have. They are, in a sense advocating for females to take charge. I mean, they work for themselves, making their own hours and wages. And to be honest, I'm not surprised. Look at today's society, there is so much emphasis on sex that woman should embrace it and use to get what they want and to achieve their goals. It's a great act of feminism.
Your perception of all prostitutes as liberated, independent entrepreneurs is not accurate.
/jkh
I agree. In fact, I think very few prostitutes fall into this category.
No, no I know that's not the case at all. It's ones that choose this as their line of work that are showing they can do what they want. Those that are forced into the sex slave trade by no means are and I didn't mean it as such.
But there's also the issue of pimps and drug addiction, even among those who choose to go into prostitution of their own free will. It is very difficult to remain an "independent contractor." Pimps and gangs "own" territory, and force women to work for them, taking all their wages and keeping them hooked on drugs to maintain control over them. That's not exactly empowerment. It is the rare prostitute who can really dictate her own schedule and clients.
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman
Pimps and gangs control BLACK MARKET sex workers. In Europe where prostitution is legal and regulated those problems are nearly eliminated along with greatly reduced rates of venereal disease.
This situation is like drug prohibition which has the primary effects of creating jobs for gun toting thugs, and making drugs easier to acquire than alcohol for minors, while doing little to stop drug use. There is no possibility of EVER stopping the sex trade, but making it illegal magnifies the problems associated with it.
I would not wish my daughter to be a drug addict, or sex worker, but if by choice or circumstance she is one day. I know she would be better protected if bigoted laws did not force these universal unstoppable situations underground.
This is an interesting topic. I've been impressed with the stance of two Germans (http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0910-01.htm). Makes me wonder a bit about how this woman feels about neo-feminism.
my documentary...
Wanna smile on the spot?