Theft in the Music Industry is a good thing...?

WrittenMemory's picture
Tagged:  •    •    •  

The Music industry's sales are gradually decreasing, which isn't a shocking concept as music can be downloaded from a plethora of different P2P engines, but is this such a bad thing? Initially, most would answer yes, as people are stealing from the artists who put their time and effort into making the music that people love. Ethically, morally, and legally, we shouldn't be taking from people what isn't ours...
However, why should we give vasts amounts of money to individuals who are often driven by money more than true artistry? Indeed, it's a somewhat fallacious argument, as people could justify artistry in almost anything. I do think, that looking at the record sales and the gross revenue of some of the "greatest" artists ever is a little ridiculous. Michael Jackson, considered the King of Pop, has sold an estimated 500 million records worldwide, and had he charged a minimal $3 a CD or DVD, he'd have grossed over 1.5 billion dollars; simple math. If one were to include concert sales and merchandise, Jackson could gross even more money for his record company, making them happy individuals. The point is, Jackson has shown that sales can reflect effort, however, I think that the people should act as a buffer to the large amounts of sales of an artist.
For an example, if I were to download any CD that I think is worth buying, I would save myself a good amount of money, and I would also limit the amount of money that any individual artist could make off of a CD. Also, I could find what I think is deserving of my money, as artists that I think put more than enough effort into the music that they produced should get my hard earned money.
A person's outlook on whether or not a musical act is true artistry is subjective, and I think it's a beautiful concept because people could then pay for CD's that contain what they feel is "real music" and download ones that are mediocre. Should an act prove to be considered a real artist by a large number of people, then the act can survive the horrendous record sales as of late. In this way, we, as a people, could weed out the artists we feel are, frankly, inadequate. Although this is a great theory, we as a people have a different tastes quite as unique as each other.
In my opinion, artists that deserve to have their CD's purchased (top ten) are:
-The Eagles
-HURT
-Marilyn Manson
-Norah Jones
-Sara Bareillis
-Metallica
-Amy Winehouse
-Arcade Fire
-Imogen Heap
-Modest Mouse

0
No votes yet

This is what I say to people!
I usually by CD's by indie artists because they're supporting themselves and they don't have a major label to give them instruments and to advertise them.

Mr. Warbanks's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

if you like it buy it.....if you dont then why would you download? why would you download music that you dont like?

if i like something i buy it......you dont go to McDonalds take a bite then give the sandwich back, DO YOU??

every artist feels that he/she is creating "real music"......also every artist has a flock of fans whether they buy albums or ringtones...its hard to qualify "real music"....objectively

just buy what you like to listen to.........STOP DOWNLOADING

you can get 5 years!!!!

chillbill's picture

At a time not too long ago artists could only sell performances. Then records/tapes/CDs/ASCP advertising supported radio and MTV created a revenue stream where nothing existed before. Now technology is threatening to take back what it gave.

Forcing people to pay, or listen to comercials in order to enjoy music is probably a thing of the past. Special intrest groups like the RIAA are trying to keep their gravy train rolling by making laws even more one sided at the expence of consumers. Just because they can do it doesn't make it right. Most of the money in question is absorbed in the corporate overhead of the music business. Artists only see a small portion.

"I don't believe in Imaginary Property"

A Fact is Always Better Than an Ideal.

Kiota's picture

Most musicians actually make very little, most their money has to go for stuff like tours and equipment... so they are seriously affected by "piracy". however... that's more an issue, imo, of people downloading huge amounts of music and then selling it, not an individual downloading music from a band he/she likes.

---------------------------------------------------
Please see my recent blog post, "Genocide and Student Activism": http://www.progressiveu.org/041447-genocide-and-student-activism

Mr. Warbanks's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

i agree....your speaking of bootleging
but the only way to combat the problem, is one person at a time.....

chillbill's picture

http://www.news.com.au/technology/story/0,25642,23318742-5014239,00.html

“We believe BitTorrent is a revolutionary digital distribution method, and we believe in finding ways to utilize new technologies instead of fighting them,” Reznor said.

A Fact is Always Better Than an Ideal.

Wombels's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

“One way or another it will change in something more resonable...

Was about time....

:-)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.