Hillary Clinton has repeatedly proven the Clinton philosophy "whatever it takes."
It seems her campaign would rather destory Obama's chances against McCain, just so she can try again in four years. Have you ever seen a candidate (or in this case candidate's spouse) talk better about a future opponent (McCain) than their own opponent? Hillary has told fibs about her imaginary sniper attacks in Bosnia, her helping to end the war in Ireland, her backing of NAFTA, her role as first lady.
In other words, she'll say whatever she thinks is necessary to win. Is that the type of president you want? Someone who will tell you what they think would be best for them to say, rather than just speaking the truth? That matters what the meaning of "is - is."
A Clinton campaign helper (surrogate) stated that Obama is only where he is because he is black. That might be partially true (he is getting overwhelmingly getting the black vote) but couldn't the same thing be said about Clinton because she is a woman? So many women are voting for Hillary just for this reason. Not because of who she is, what she stands for, what her policies are, but because she is a woman....that's it. If that is your reason to vote, so be it.. But just realize now, if the Clinton's get back in the white house, they will be as secretive as the Bushes, and keep their own little tight nit group of people around them (like the Bushes).
I am an Obama supporter but I have always been an Independent. The Clintons may be Democrats but they are a mirror image of the methods and philosophies of the Bushes. Don't forget that.
Clinton's campaign is willing to deliver a negative light on Obama when her dirty little secrets are still around. No one's bringing that up though, because the other candidates have decided to CHANGE the way politics are played. Does anyone remember the Whitewater scandal?
She's dividing the party, which is the last thing this country needs right now- more division.
-Sonja :)
"Democracy works only when you vote. When you don't take the time to vote for the candidate you find the least offensive, you run the risk of electing the candidate you find the most offensive."