Material Destruction

  One. One is indivisible. One is really all you need of anything. One thing can change your life. In a minute, one thing, could become the creation of the destructionof everthing. Everything can not be quantified to its fullest degree in the formula for killing our planet, and destroyingour world. Everything means everything, and when everything is gone, we won't even have one...we will have none. The natural instinct for survival we are born with, has provided us technology to reach intoour environment in order to find ways to enrich our lives, as well as provide us with more than just our "basic needs". We no longer live in a minimalists society. We live in a material world. Within this world we call our home we are constantly destroying it. For what? For a better future, a better life, what are we planting seeds oftermination for when we know we need to be harvesting ecological balance. By 2016 we are supposed to be on a fuel rashion. The world is and will change dramaticallyat this turning point. We have to ask ourselfs, "is this what we want?" The liklihood of a fuel shortage isprobable. Within that scenario are multiple elements of chaotic obstacles that we as a world will have to unifyto overcome. Think about the facts: We have intentionally planted a shipwreck upon the Middle East.Our implementing democracies, along side the outsourcing we are now pursuing in under-developed countries has producedthe uprise of more "consumer nations". The problem here is not the encouragement to rebuild societes that grant more freedom and equality to their citizens. The problem is that we do notneed to produce a utility for consumption in geographic locations, whose citizens live under the laws of the land. The people we are laying these values upon, are the refraction of who we need to become. Mininalists, conservers, rationalists, people of our land, these concepts are the concepts we need to be undertaking ourselves, not taking away from those who already live under a natural prescription to conserve. The more we industrialize in undeveloped countries the more damage we implement upon the earth. For example: Our oil situations breaching a point of scarce rarity. Why do we want to infuse the concept of automobiles to countries who have not used them.In a world where "plastics make it possible". The possibility that, the main component in plastic"oil" could run out, and can destroy our ozone layer, is more than possible by chance. The fact is, this is nota possible ending, this is a probobable finale'. The way we use oil,produces many negative effects on the environment. What is going to be possible when we no longer have clean air because we have emitted to many carcinogens, plustoxins, multiplied by exhaust fumes. The answer to that question is: one big sticky, non-repairable pollutant, that wecreated and in past-tense would have been refered to as our world. We will have to work as "one" to change. The changes we need to make are not he's or she's,and her's and hims, doing this's and that's. We the people of our world need to individualy accept the lawsof conservation. We as individuals need to initiate our own restrictions on what we consume. We, as individuals need to define our "needs" from our "wants". We, as Individuals need to unify with our-selves, so that we may unify with each other, to regenerate the "one" asset most valuable to our existence.Our world, we only have one, and one "was" all we needed.....but that won't be the case if we can'tsettle on "one" choice...Change.