Osama Bin-Laden DOES NOT exist!!!!!

Mr. Warbanks's picture

I remember vividly in the days following the Sept. 11th attacks my father said something to me that I passed off as rediculous. Now before i tell you what he said, maybe i should give a little background. First, my father is a very smart man. He is an electrical engineer at a fortune 500 petro-chemical company. Having given you background on my father, he told me with a strait face, (SERIOUSLY) "Osama Bin Laden DOESN'T exist!!"

Now like i said before, i passed this off as rhetoric when i first heard it, but as the years have passed, and the lines have been drawn, i am beginning to believe. NOW I am not one of those people that believe it was a giant conspiracy, but i could see a president who had nothing for his legacy conjure up a COMMON ENEMY on the heals of the worst attack on american soil ever.

Saying that I feel free to now DECLARE "Osama Bin Ladin DOES NOT exist!!!"

He is a real man. there is a real Al-quieda. BUT the picture of that skinny bearded man named Bin-Ladin. Mearly used as propaganda for the eventual "WAR ON THE MIDDLE EAST" or WAR ON TERROR. which ever you would like to use..

The man in those movies and photos that no-one seen before government officials, TRANSLATED IT FOR US, he is really an outcast member of a prominent Saudi family, who was disowned for his ANTI-WESTERN philosophies. Bin-Ladin's family are close personal friends of the Bush's. Bin-Ladin also was trained by US special forces to DEFEND afghanistan against the SOVIET UNION in the 80's.

what alot of people dont know is that HE IN FACT DID spew anti american language on video during the MID-90's, but was deemed a NON-THREAT by then president Bill Clinton. He supposedly died of kidney problems in the months before the Sept. 11th attacks.

This means that all thoses Bin-Ladin video's you have seen on the news were accually originally broadcast about 5 years before Sept. 11, and were re-aired to AMERICANS in order to Strike up new talks of INVADING the middle east, most notably Iraq. Iraq, had been in the cross hairs of Neo-Cons since the first Bush was in office.

For those who do not agree, i leave with these two ponits.

1. America has yet to capture Bin-Ladin. We only hear of him during elections. We have caught EVERYBODY, why not Bin-Ladin. HE'S ALREADY DEAD.

2. Iraq was originally invaded to free its people from Sadaam Hussein, and because it was thought that Iraq harbored terrorists. Are there any other countries (besides lowly Afghanistan) that harbor terrorists? Pakistan (they have the bomb too), Saudi Arabia (they are our friends), Somalia (read about the current situation there), Egypt (over half of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi or Egyptian). What are we doing in those countries, and why dont we hear about them?

Now I am not SUPPORTING terrorists, or going all ANTI AMERICAN. Honestly, i feel that we do have to keep some sort of presence in the middle east. As it will insure OUR future as Americans, but I would just like to get the real SKINNY! NOT SOME JUST FOR ME WATERED DOWN VERSION OF THE TRUTH.

Also check out my latest blog on the FBI, and their problems with citizens privacy

http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/mr-warbanks

4
Average: 4 (3 votes)

Odd as it sounds, I can believe some of it. I can think of him as deceased now. Do you remember the interrogation videos of Saddam Hussein. He emphatically stated he did not deal with bin Laden. Yeah we are a manipulated mass. What can we do? I wish I could say. But anytime I see someone on PROGRESSIVEU here propose alternatives to capitalism they are attacked. How strange that is too me. Guess progress is restricted to profit's.

DrifterDani6886's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

I noticed something really strange. On the anniversary of 9/11 Bin laden was suppose to release a new video. Well he did. When the video was released I watched it and noticed something odd. He looked younger than he did in the last video in the video before that one bin laden looked extremely sick and just about ready to die. I believe he is already passed away just like you believe. I wouldn't put it past the government of making up a story just to ivade iraq. If you think about it logically Bush's dad invaded iraq when he was president. The bush now is doing the same thing. A good book to read for anyone is a book called Consipracy by Charlotte Greg. This has alot of interesting issues. But in order to like this book a person must believe the government is flawed. Good Blog

Mr. Warbanks's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

yep....ideally i wish we could be a bit more Socialized....like health care, ALL education, and even housing. Imagine if America was as is, but with garanteed education as high as you could go, housing, and heathcare. we would have a country of real intellectuals.

it would piss off the rich people though....they would say "If I worked to buy a house, why would someone just get one?"

PLEASE rate my blog, whether you like it or not

son_of_disaster's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

It would piss a lot of people off. I am anything but rich and the idea of socializing things is a load of crap to me. Just because you have guaranteed education doesn't mean you'll have intellectuals. Humanity is circling the drain fast enough that it doesn't matter. You have to want education, not have it guaranteed. People give less than a crap about education so it is an utter waste to guarantee it anymore than it already is.

I do think there is something odd about Bin Laden though.

Mr. Warbanks's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

Thanks for your opinions on both topics, especially Bin-Ladin
Also, i can agree that most would not benefit from free education, but think of all of the college students here blogging for scholarships.....WHAT IF IT WAS ALL FREE?

Coupled with free housing for those who have finished the "program" or graduated college. Its a interesting plan.

our taxes would kill us though...lol

Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

Where's the money to pay for the teachers, books, student housing, building maintenance, etc going to come from?

-- quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Mr. Warbanks's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

thats what i meant by "our taxes would kill us though...lol"

in some European countries your taxes can be as high as 40%, but that means that certain things are garanteed.

son_of_disaster's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

And I thought our taxes were bad now. That is my biggest problem, taxes suck and even bigger ones mean even bigger problems, lol.

What is that load of crap, sounds like FOX news has got hold of your antennae. Watching and reading the mass news out there will make you disaffected and pissed off. Gotta get off the couch.

son_of_disaster's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

I don't watch the mainstream news, so thanks for making an inaccurate statement and making yourself look immensly foolish. Right there is my main reason for being disaffected and pissed off, idiotic comments with no backing, so please expand your brain.

First off,

"He supposedly died of kidney problems in the months before the Sept. 11th attacks."

Says who? Your genius father?

And secondly, if you think universal healthcare would save our nation, it won't
If we allowed them to socialize the private sector of healthcare, it would be a government takeover of 15.5% of our GDP.

Take a look at the plans, it is not socializing it, they want to subsidize it. That is two different ideals. The government doesn't want the responsibility of taking care of the sick. It has been a trend to get as far from there as possible since the 1970's when the public hospitals were shut down, and HMO's were introduced. Richard Nixon was introduced the idea of private capital investing in the health care market, and it has taken off since. That is the crisis now. Because no longer is charity easily accesible. But still maintaining a humanitarian stance without looking like a Standard Oil there must be treatment for the poor. That affect raises costs for the "responsible individual" now that is where you see government get in the game. These large HMO's are approaching the government because they are losing money taking care of the poor. How to stop that? Subsidize them so they are no longer an expense, they have a contribution to the bottom line.

And oh yeah, Osama. It would appear as if it doesn't matter if he is dead or alive. The end game was accomplished. Embed the US military for protection to the Petroleum companies, while they extract as much of the resource, untaxed, unregulated as possible.

Mr. Warbanks's picture
Member of the Progressive U Alumni Association

i didnt say he was a genius......just a very smart man...
Maybe YOU can go find Bin-Ladin.....lol

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.