Let me state for the record that I am a Zen Buddhist. Before you say anything, I must warn you that there is a penalty of death by a thousand cuts for anyone who says "The fat guy?" after I state this fact. Buddha was, in fact, thin; the fat guy is a different individual altogether. If you find out his name and tell me, I'll give you a cookie. Now! To business.
Being Buddhist as I am, I look on the Dalai Lama with a certain amount of fondness. Actually, that doesn't do it justice. How shall I put this? He is the Bono of the Zen sect. If he made a record, it would be made of pure win. As such, I get perturbed when people try to put him down. (Just because he gets around. ...Oh my, that sounded dirty.) AUTHOR'S NOTE: What follows is probably remarkably biased and will try to realte to you the exact reasons why the New York Times makes the vein in my temple throb daily.
It would seem that the Dalai Lama has been given an award by George "I Wanna Be On T.V., Want People To Know Me" Bush for protesting the plight of the Tibetan people making the world aware of the injustice of the Chinese government's occupation of Tibet, and generally being hardcore. I was remarkably happy when I learned of tihs, until I realized that I hadn't heard the whole story.
China, upon hearing that His Holiness was to get this award, threw a tantrum the likes of which have not been seen since I stopped calling my mother a liar when she didn't get me a treat from the supermarket. I wasn't surprised at this fact; on the contrary, I expected a negative reaction. He's being honored for pointing out that fact that China invaded his country and asking them for decades to stop it, please. But what they said and what they did after that almost made blood shoot out of my nose. Direct quote:
"We are furious...If the Dalai Lama can receive such
an award, there must be no justice or good people in the world.”
--Zhang Qingli, Chinese Communist Party head
Give me a second, I need to read that again. Perhaps I'll pick up some subtle nuance, some word or phrase that will magically transform what Zhang said into a coherant message.
Sorry! Didn't work. I guess I was right the first time in pegging Zhang as a liar and crook of the Vladimir Putin school, the kind of man who can say the word "justice" and invoke its power without having a shred of respect for what that word means.
Did I miss something? Did justice and tolerance grow like a mutant flower in the CCP overnight? Because last I checked, these were the same people that brought Tiananmen Square down on my head. Shooting students because they had the gall to ask for democracy. Oh, and this is the same CCP that brought the good people of China the Cultural Revolution, right? Yeah, that was a lot of fun. And totalitarianbrainwashing! That Little Red Book...always on the bestseller charts, I hear. Plus, don't forget the flagrant human rights abuses. And the One Child Policy's forced abortions.
From what I remember from World History class, the CCP has about as much right to talk about justice as Jenghis Khan. How dare he? How dare he? Zhang, old fellow, perhaps we're using a different dictionary, or something got lost in translation. When I think of justice, I think of fairness, equality, tolerance, democratic principles, freedom, and other such sillyness that my good friend Thomas Paine loved with all of his revellious heart. You, on the other hand, are obviously defining justice as your ability to bend the good people of China to your will, like a petty, cruel, outmoded dictator.
Can't the CCP realize that they aren't fooling anyone? They are well on their way to becoming the next economic superpower. Every politician is frightened to death of crossing them, because of what that could spell for their country's trade futures. The world market is too dependent on its damned Happy Meal toys and twenty-dollar Wal Mart tricycles to make one peep about the horrors that the Chinese government has visited upon its people.
Well, it's gone too far now. The CCP must be held responsible for all its past and current crimes immediately. Obviously, the people that rule China have gotten the impression that they can do whatever they want, with no regard for basic decency or human rights. It's time to prove them wrong. Wake up, world. Wake up, nations, and slay the Chinese dragon that is dangerously close to devouring you whole.




Wow... Ahem...
My reply: INSUFFICIENT KNOWLEDGE FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER.
I'll definitely get back to this post after some research.
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/infinitymachine
yes, i definitely don't have enough knowledge of this subject either to post a meaningful answer.
So, did you hear about China's determination to "decide" the new Dalai Lama after the current one passes away? That's even more deserving of a rage.
T.k.
I think it would be a half-hearted rage, because the thought that the CCP could actually dictate reincarnation has such comedic possibilities that I would be unable to overlook them. But I'm definitely working on it, it grows less humorous the more I realize that they're serious.
--Samus
(if you're not outraged, you're not paying attention)
Yes, it is comical that they think they have the power to dictate something like reincarnation, but it's also extremely arrogant. Feel free to write your blog as sarcasm or satire - it would look even better that way! The majority of bloggers here are not Zen Buddhist, of course, so you'd have to be careful with inside joke or barbs, but other than that it could be wonderful. Go for it!
T.k.
The more I think about it, the more I like the sound of it...so look for this one later; I think perhaps I will write a sarcastic/serious explanation of Buddhism and include China's whole spiel in it. Thanks.
--Samus
(if you're not outraged, you're not paying attention)
the blatant (and the now acceptable) human rights violation and the totalatarin/authoritarian "Peoples Republic of China" (yeah, right)...
They haven't been fooling anyone, they are just blessed to exist in an era where people are apathetic to a cause unless it DIRECTLY affects and involves them (how many people really knew of Al Qaeda or Osama before 9/11? and who really gave a fuck about Saddam until WMD rhetoric was bombarded at us?).
I've been reading about the persecution/imprisonmnet of people in China (those who tried to stand up against the CCP) for the past 3 years-- Especially the ban on the Falun Gong and its followers.
It disgusts me and sickens me but China isn't going to change and we are not going to force it to change---because we want it to be stable and provide us all the supplies/products we need, at outrageously low prices.
Wealth, however, does have one advantage over looks: beauty fades, interest accrues." -- Dan Savage.
"Wealth never decreases because of charity." Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)
http://www.progressiveu.org/231615-this-is-a-muslim-girls-plight
Of course! How would we survive without the wonders of Wal-Mart? sigh. One more reason to eliminate the trade deficit.
--Samus
(if you're not outraged, you're not paying attention)
almost everything...... BUT i can't help it--
I'm a little bit above being dirt poor so of course I buy that shit too-only if i really really can't get it anywhere else-- but as soon as I get money/cash and hit some kind of jack pot, I will stop buying things made in china stuff
"I leave my one and only grain of spiritual sand
to universal scales of humanity, all humanity...
forever is finding a solution to a solution." -Forever Begins, Common
http://www.progressiveu.org/231615-this-is-a-muslim-girls-plight
Oh I know, but Wal-Mart is a monolith I can blame things on easily. Aaaah, I have no qualms, do I? Sigh. But you're right, it's inescapable. It's either China or Vietnam. Or Korea.
--Samus
(if you're not outraged, you're not paying attention)
HOTEH (EDIT: Wiki says Hotei. Is that more right?)
I might have spelled it wrong.
I want my cookie now.
Please.
For the love of...Buddha. A cookie. I need it. Class of 08=drooling retarded six year olds.
So a cookie please.
Hotei is slightly more correct with the whole pronunciation thing. For those not in the know, it is pronounced HOE-TAY. Fun fun.
What kind of cookie?
--Samus
(if you're not outraged, you're not paying attention)
To be fair, I should probably join you in your China bashing, as my family's from Taiwan. But should you look at it objectively, China effectively occupied and "conquered" Tibet, making Tibet under their control. The Dalai Lama and the people out there that want them to leave, no matter how politely they are asking, can be considered "rebels." What Bush has done is award the leader of a group of rebels, or at least in China's eyes.
The one child policy was created, not to suppress human rights, but to keep the population from overgrowing itself. There are a ridiculously large amount of people in China and it's getting harder and harder for it to feed itself. Sorry, but it's kinda how it is. If they were doing it because they wanted to keep the population of the people down to keep them under their "totalitarian brainwashing" control, then it would be different. But it's not that.
No matter who the rebels are, even if they are students, they are still rebels. Sorry. But everyone is a somebody to somebody else. At the time, it was a reasonable reaction under a reasonable policy: Immediately halt all opposition. And it scared the people into not doing it again, right? The way they went about it, in today's eyes, was wrong. Perceptions change, and they did, which is why people cite Tiananmen Square.
Learn to see things from another's point of view. China's "tantrum," in their eyes, is a logical response. Because you don't see it that way does not mean that you can point fingers and judge. Because you don't see it as "logical" and "reasonable" does not mean that you can dismiss it altogether.
1) I personally have a major problem with the invasion and annexation of any land. China wades in and takes Tibet by force. They have that land by right of conquest; by that ticket I don't believe they should have it.
2) Let's just address all of your "rebel" statements at once. I hear where you're coming from with some of this..."Everyone, even a savior or a hero, is a criminal to someone." But I don't really think I'm being unreasonable about this. What the Chinese government has done since the 1960s, from the Cultural Revolution through Tiananmen Square to today, has been unacceptable by the standards set by the Declaration of Human Rights. While the CCP's actions are logical to them--and to anybody who understands authoritarian government--that is beside the point. I never said that China's actions weren't logical; for a government that wants complete control over its citizens, anything short of complete eradication of dissent is most illogical. But logic is not my point. When I condemn China, I do so not only with my own morality, but with the commonly held morality that has been passed into law by the United Nations. All countries have the responsibility to obey U.N. resolutions; that's what they're there for. My beef with China exists with their disrespect for the concept of what a government can justly do, and for their gall in claiming that, if things don't go their way, there must not be justice in the world.
3)The One Child Policy was, in theory, good. The world could use a wake-up call, humans are getting ridiculous with the births and whatnot. But, y'know, correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't the OCP resulted in state-mandated abortions? Just saying. But you're right, it doesn't have to do with brainwashing...that I know of. However, I can put you in touch with the authors of several papers on the human rights violations inherent in the OCP.
--Samus
(if you're not outraged, you're not paying attention)
http://www.progressiveu.org/090204-dont-miss-this-chance
i loved your blog. it was pretty funny. yeah, china has a lot of problems
DISCLAIMER: I am not being rude. I'm stating my opinion. No personal attacks are meant. Please give some leniency on how you take my words. imagine me saying them with a smile. ^__^
The Dalai Lama peaceful, while his thought a reason to push him in exile, believes are the reason why this is his life, he therefore carries no need to make choices for his own.
The believes of the Dalai Lama are still formed in a reality, understanding thoughts better than one’s around, makes the Lama a liability
Some countries even refuse entry to the Dalai Lama!?