Workman executed
Flurry of legal maneuvers fails to derail death sentence
By SHEILA BURKE, BRAD SCHRADE and SHEILA WISSNER
Staff Writers
The state executed condemned cop killer Philip Workman in a West Nashville prison early today in the third death sentence carried out in Tennessee in 47 years.
Workman, 53, was pronounced dead at 1:38 a.m. after a lethal cocktail of drugs was injected into his body as he lay strapped to a gurney at Riverbend Maximum Security Institutio
Workman’s last words were brief.
“I've prayed to the Lord Jesus Christ not to lay charge of my death to any man,” Workman said.
About two minutes later, with his eyes closed as he gulped, somewhat nervously, Workman uttered a final statement: “I commend my spirit into your hands Lord Jesus Christ.”
He then turned his head slightly to the left and lay motionless, as an ashen color overtook his face.
Workman's arms, legs and midsection were strapped to the gurney. He wore white prison pants and a cream prison top. An intraveneous line was attached to his right arm.
The drugs were administered by a person in another room and pumped through a tube that appeared be fed through a prison wall.
Warden Ricky Bell, dressed in a black suit, stood at the head of the gurney, his hands clasped throughout most of the 17-minute process.
Minutes after Workman's last words, prison officials drew shut the brown blinds over the window separating witnesses from the execution chamber. Bell then spoke through a microphone and pronounced Workman dead.
Workman was executed nearly 25 years to the day of his conviction in the 1981 shooting death of Memphis police Lt. Ronald Oliver.
Authorities say Workman fired the fatal shot during a botched robbery at a Wendy’s hamburger restaurant. But the condemned and his supporters maintained until the end that it was not his bullet that killed Oliver, instead suggesting that another police officer inadvertently shot Oliver during the chaos of the moment.
Oliver’s family members, including his widow, were just feet away from Workman, watching the through a glass window as the deadly drugs were fed into his arm.
The Oliver family declined to comment, but a victim’s rights advocate with the group "You Have the Power" addressed reporters after the execution.
“Though a sentence has finally been carried out, nothing will happen that will ever provide them closure,” said Valerie Craig, who spoke for the family.
Workman's family was not present during the execution. His brother had planned to attend but backed out Tuesday evening.
Two hours before his death sentence was to be carried out, Workman asked the state's highest court to delay his execution but the Tennessee Supreme Court denied the appeal.
In the last ditch filing, Workman's lawyers argued that the inmate's execution date, coming just over a week after the state issued new death penalty protocols, denied him sufficient time to challenge the process.
"There is a growing body of medical, scientific, and other evidence which clearly shows that lethal injection using (the proscribed combination of drugs) without monitoring of anesthetic depth risks torture," his lawyers wrote.
But in an unsigned ruling issued just after 12:30 a.m., the state Supreme Court found that "Workman’s challenge to the revised protocol has no likelihood of success on the merits."
"At some point, the State has a right to impose a sentence not just because the State’s interests in finality are compelling, but also because there is a 'powerful and legitimate interest in punishing the guilty...,'" the ruling states. "After twenty-five years and countless court proceedings, that time has come."
Workman's lawyers worked furiously to stop the execution.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to grant Workman a stay. His lawyers turned to the nation’s highest court after requests for a delay were rejected by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Last week, U.S. District Judge Todd Campbell issued a temporary restraining order until he could hear testimony on the new lethal injection protocol the state planned to use in Workman’s execution. But the circuit court overturned that ruling Monday saying the method is used successfully in other states.
As the day wore on yesterday, Workman asked the U.S. District Court in Nashville to release his body to his brother immediately after his death and not allow an autopsy to be performed.
Judge Campbell later issued a temporary injunction ordering the state not to autopsy Workman’s body at least until a hearing can be held on May 14.
Workman met with family, friends and a spiritual advisor yesterday, said Dorinda Carter, spokeswoman for the Tennessee Department of Correction.
At one point, he asked that a vegetarian pizza be purchased and donated for his last meal, but prison officials refused.
“He instructed that it be given to a homeless person but we’re not able to do that," Carter said. Instead, Workman decided to skip dinner on the eve of his execution. "He could have had food from the cafeteria that the other inmates were having tonight," she said.
Outside the prison, about 60 anti-death penalty protestors gathered for a vigil. As the time for a reprieve grew short, some of the protestors said they had lost hope that his life would be spared.
"My spirit has hope but my worldly mind says there's not much hope," said Alonzo Fortune, a Nashville man who opposes the death penalty.
The group was singing and holding hands in a circle while standing in a fenced-off grass field.
Inside the prison, Workman was on death-watch, just feet away from the death chamber.
"I wish our governor would wake up and realize that it just doesn't work," said Jay Gilchrist, a lay minister in Nashville. "The death penalty doesn't deter crime. It doesn't save taxpayer money. That's for sure. And it's not a civilized thing to do."
Workman joins Robert Glen Coe (executed in April 2000) and Sedley Alley (executed in June 2006) as only the third person executed by the state of Tennessee since 1960.
So, this may seem to be a waste of my time but I would like you to read this part again:
"At one point, he asked that a vegetarian pizza be purchased and donated for his last meal, but prison officials refused.
“He instructed that it be given to a homeless person but we’re not able to do that," Carter said. Instead, Workman decided to skip dinner on the eve of his execution. "He could have had food from the cafeteria that the other inmates were having tonight," she said.
Outside the prison, about 60 anti-death penalty protestors gathered for a vigil. As the time for a reprieve grew short, some of the protestors said they had lost hope that his life would be spared."
I have an arguement for this, I promise. Think about this, there's enough money to execute someone but you can't just take a damn pizza, his last selfless act and give it to a homeless person? And Carter's "He could have had food from the cafeteria" that's not the point! He wanted to do something for someone else at his last meal instead of taking it all for himself. There's no reason to deny a dead man walking his last wish, none at all, he's going to be dead soon.
This irritated me to no end and I do believe something needs to be done about this. I am anti-death penalty bt short of that there's another issue, why could that not be done? Why was that donation not possible? Each man sentanced to death by lethal inection has a budget on his last meal, when that money is not spent it goes back into a fund and is generally wasted.
So here's my question, forget that this money will be used again on another inmate, do you believe his last selfless act should be denyed?
I'd like to get some opinions on this because if there's a strong enough outcry I do believe I will have to make a pizza and give it to a homeless person in this man's name.
Alexa












Next time only post some of the article and provide a link for the rest, that way people won't get bored with it before you get to your own opinions.
So all he wanted was to give a homeless person a pizza? That's not a crazy wish. Actually, it seems pretty kind of him. I don't know why those prison officials couldn't do this, but I think they still could have found a way.
You don't need a public outcry to donate the pizza to a homeless person. Feeling as strongly as you do, I think you should do it anyway. It'll make you feel pretty awesome anyway.
Refer to this blog for copying and pasting guidelines: http://progressiveu.org/223330-copying-and-pasting-into-your-blog-a-brief-guide
Additionally, you might want to figure out a way to separate your comments from the article itself, because it's difficult to tell where your opinions begin.
That being said, I agree that the prison official should have just done what he asked. It wasn't an expensive or time-consuming last wish.
~C
Visit my blog.
Yes, the message in the movie is a good one. I do believe, on the contrary, I believe that there are two plots which parallel each other throughout the movie. I'll begin with the obvious plot: the dancing penguin trys to find the "aliens" to communicate the loss of fish back at his home.
The other plot is with the dancing penguin. He was born the "ugly duckling" and his character developed as someone who was not accepted by the general community. Furthermore, the plot of the dancing character was to find a way earn respect that was not given to him because of his disability. This plot further develops as he travels through unknown territory to find where the fish have gone. Essentially the plot with the dancing penguin is one he has with himself. It is not obvious, and is and different, and not a commononly used type of plot, which makes it hard to identify--nevertheless the plot of the dancing penguins does exist.