First Bob McDonnell took the liberal Wikipedia hit. Why should they stop there?
Now we have found that none other than Lieutenant Governor Bill Bolling is taking his share of underhanded hits on Wikipedia as well.
Of course, hardcoredemocrat is making his second appearance so far with Bolling's entry.
Vthoms267 has made their debut appearance on Wikipedia by slanting Bolling's name too.
So much for unbiased article evaluations...
It goes back to this root idea: Wikipedia is an educational tool for children and educators. The left has taken this teaching tool and turned it into a political weapon. Do they have no shame? They are quickly jumping to turn unbiased articles on Republican legislators into articles where their tirade of left wing agendas can be reported on as if they were "facts." So are we now going to have to monitor Wikipedia just to make sure the left does not misuse it?
And conservatives don't do the same thing?
"So are we now going to have to monitor Wikipedia just to make sure the left does not misuse it?"
It's everyone, not just the left. Must I find more evidence to point this out to you...again? :)
But that that's wrong using wiki to slander people's names. Visit www.uncyclopedia.org It's ran by wiki but none of the info is true, it's a satirical site, read it for a good laugh if you want.
------------------------------------------------------------
"When people say, "I’m so tired it's not even funny" or "my head hurts so much it's not even funny", why would it even be funny in the first place?"
Can you find me some sources that prove your point? Only one person has showed me an incident to the latter question. And it seems to be sparse. What I have found, as did the Dog (amongst others), the Dog being the one who first brought this to the public eye's scrutiny, that editing like this is NOT sparse when it comes to the Dems. They do it all the time. They twist and mangle the facts until they are skewed and damaged.
And this, on an open site that prides itself as being a teaching tool where children and educators come to gather reputable information. Now, it is beginning to turn into a political tool. Is this a good thing?
"that editing like this is NOT sparse when it comes to the Dems"
Did try to report those people to the mods (I'm sure they at least have some right?)And I didn't say it was or wasn't but your post seemed to make it like it was ALL their fault ALL the time, maybe you could put it's done by them a lot more that the right? Just a thought.
And I laugh at the thought that educators go to wiki for reliable information, but I'm sure some do...unfortunately. You know since we have these things called books, they're not so horrible :)
"Only one person has showed me an incident to the latter question. And it seems to be sparse."
That one person was me, I think :)
------------------------------------------------------------
"When people say, "I’m so tired it's not even funny" or "my head hurts so much it's not even funny", why would it even be funny in the first place?"