Think highschool is pointless? Abolish it!

Bamers's picture
Tagged:  •    •    •    •    •  

In my school work I came across an assignment to write a summary and response to an article. We were given the choice of a couple, but one really caught my eye. "Let Teenagers Try Adulthood" seemed like the perfect topic for me, I've blogged before on how terribly teens are treated in the eyes of adults (http://www.progressiveu.org/085629-despising-youth), but imagine my surprise when the author didn't mean let us try adulthood, but rather make us adults a lot earlier.

In the article, “Let Teenagers Try Adulthood”, Leon Botstein clearly states that he believes, “The American high school is obsolete and should be abolished." While high schools do have flaws, I do not believe any of them are large enough to warrant abolishing the entire institution.

One of Botstein’s first points is the over abundance of high school cliques, defined by a “superficial definition of good looks…popularity, and sports prowess.” He further states that the teachers, especially coaches, seem to look the other way. Yes, high school cliques are a problem and dominate the “teen scene” but look at their role models. When the people you look up to are full of a “superficial definition of good looks and attractiveness, popularity, and sports prowess” like Michael Jordan, Paris Hilton, Tom Cruise and Serena Williams, what can you expect? Teens are constantly bombarded with the message that the real world is defined by looks and popularity. Ironically, Botstein claims, “But the rules of high school turn out not to be the rules of life.” Clearly this is not true. You probably know who won the Super bowl or one of the Academy Awards winners; but do you know who runs “Google”? Even Bill Gates, the richest man in the world, isn’t as well known as actress Lindsay LoHan, who is constantly in the news. Botstein can’t use the culture of high schools to condemn high schools without criticizing the entire society. Furthermore, many students lead healthy social lives even if they’re not in the popular clique.

Botstein then moves his remarks from the learning place to the learning. He begins, “Given the poor quality of recruitment and training for high school teachers, it is no wonder that the curriculum and the enterprise of learning hold so little sway over young people.” On the contrary, many high school students excel in learning and go on to college, later becoming successful businessmen and women. But Botstein is right; too many students don’t realize the importance of high school and by the time they graduate “and realize what really is at stake in becoming an adult, too many opportunities have been lost and too much time has been wasted.” In that case, I think we should rethink out teaching methods. Enough small changes could be implemented, such as smaller classes and more interactive and electronic supplements to boost the overall effectiveness of high schools. University Prep, a Detroit-based high school, recently graduated their first senior class with a 90% graduation rate and all the graduates are going on the college. Their secret? Teacher’s spent time with students individually, creating lasting bonds. Success is achievable through the current system; we just need to rethink our priorities.

Finally, Botstein’s punch line, “Young people should graduate at 16 rather than 18” is absolutely absurd. The majority of 16 year olds aren’t ready for college or a full time job. In all fairness, some 16 year olds do have the intellectual capabilities and maturity to handle college classes; I am one of them. Therefore I can honestly say the vast majority of 16 year olds, even 17 year olds, don’t have the levels of maturity and accountability necessary for college, which, in turn, applies to a full time job. At 16, teens should be worried about school, friends, and family, not a paycheck and car payments. I fear that if the graduation age is lowered, we will experience more burnouts.

Botstein’s idea to abolish high school, while well founded, is insane. High schools should examine their individual systems and create programs tailored to their students as University Prep has done. All in all, high school is not a life scarring experience, as Botstein would have you believe. It is a time for young people to have fun and learn about themselves and others. Let them enjoy their short time in sanctuary; they will become adults soon enough. Why push them so hard?

truelife90's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

I wouldn't exactly abolish high school either although there are many things that could be improved. Perhaps it is the students' fault as much as the teachers', the schools' and the government's. Yes, kicking young adults into a real adulthood is pretty unwise. We have 16 years old mothers who do not even know the way of life yet and we expect kids to teach each other stuff. How nice...
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.mylot.com/?ref=truelife

Zephyr_Aurion's picture

~The Writer~

I agree with you wholeheartedly.
High school does have its place and few people are ready for the real world by the time they are 16. If you think suicide rates are high now then, imagine putting 16 year old children in command of their own lives. I'm 18 and I know where I was two years ago and it wasn't pretty.
Different kids learn at different rates and a program needs to be created to the streamline students so that they get the education they need, not the ones assigned to them. Plenty of intelligent students drop out every year because school is being dumbed down for them, even AP classes.
Online coursework, on the other hand, is a terrible idea. Smaller classes, yes, but if left to their own devices, students will cheat out of any unnecessary work. High school merely needs to be reformatted to give students more of a sense of purpose, and identity, rather then a collective mob mentality. Vocational classes are limited and there are so many required classes that students get few options in terms of electives.
High Schools are beginning to track students toward career options and only time will tell if this is successful or not.

High school couldn't be abolised. Those who support this idea are just further demonstrating their ignorance.
Once high school was taken away I'm certain that all who supported it's abolision, would start a riot to have it back.
Students don't know what they want until they get it.

well, i kinda agree with him. i have a friend from germany, and she says that there, things are mildly different. they basically have two versions of high school. at around 14 or so, you think long and hard, and coupled with your school performance, you get put in one or the other (this is public schools, of course). one high school track prepares you for the workforce, the other prepares you for college. that way countless dollars aren't spent on kids preparing for college when they don't even wanna go. i think a similar system would make much sense here, especially in high dropout districts. my friend told me that looking at the american system, we give too many chances here. so i think an overhaul of the system would be very wise. now i know it's not necessarily reasonable to expect a fourteen year old to know what they plan to do for life. but on the same vein, many college students don't know either. but means a whole lot more once you're paying for it than when you just have to show up and know you can get passed simply because you've been failed twice already.

ediblewoman's picture
Volunteer for the Progressive U Alumni Association

I like the idea of giving kids the option to train for the workforce instead of high school as we know it today. The only thing I worry about is those kids who weren't ready to be academics at 14. If there is no way for them to jump the track and change their minds, I think we pigeonhole them. I am a fan of this system so long as there are checkpoints along the way at which students may shift gears, and as long as colleges will accept those students who did the vocational track but can still score well on college entrance exams. I mean, those who want to go to college and who feel they can do the work (and can back this up with scores that prove it) should have the option, regardless of what they did at 14. People change a lot in the four years between 9th grade and high school graduation.

"Never go with a hippy to a second location."
~Jack Donaghy
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/ediblewoman

misnomer's picture

I'm going to have to disagree where you say that Lindsey Lohan in better known than Bill Gates. While she may get more mention, Gates fame is much more long lasting and more wide spread.

Like what you've read? Well, then here's more:
http://www.progressiveu.org/blog/tricia0711

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.