Beliefs of Mormons:
1. We were sent to this world to gain experience, to distinguish good from evil, to learn and grow through the choices we make as we "act and are acted upon" in mortality. >> What? We are "sent" here? What does that mean? If we were already in Heaven, why would God honestly send us here? He has us already, that just makes absolute NO sense.
2. Heavenly Father knew that we would make mistakes here on earth so he had Jesus Christ, his son, suffer for the sins of the world. Because Jesus Christ paid the price for sin, we don’t have to if we accept Him in our lives and live according to His teachings. >> Again, what? Basically they're saying that we can be as bad as we want, but if we accept Him as our salvation then we are okay? Uh, no. Repentance means to walk away from what you were doing. Turn around and make a fresh start so to speak. Also, God sent his son to die for us so that WE wouldn't have to suffer from our sins and COULD be saved, not because He knew we would make mistakes. That just leads people to think that God PLANNED on us making mistakes and made us so that we would. Wrong again, we were made "perfect" but with free will. We sinned, there was our flaw.
3. Mormons believe that Joseph Smith restored the true church on the earth. >> HAHA ROFLMAO, I'm sorry but seriously come on! Joseph Smith was a drunk! God intended the Bible to be read by all, the only translation needing was from language to language, not from these plates and seeing stones were only HE could read them because of Moroni. BTW, who is Moroni? Not saying he couldn't be, but still. If this Angel DID in fact bring information to one person alone so they could start a new Church, don't you think they would have been mentioned in the Bible? Not just by this drunkard?
http://www.mormonbeliefs.org
http://www.mormonsite.org/
Beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses:
1. He is the Son of God. He came to earth from heaven and gave his perfect human life as a ransom sacrifice. His death and resurrection made salvation to eternal life possible for those exercising faith in him. He is now ruling as King of God's heavenly Kingdom, which will soon bring peace to the entire earth. Jesus never claimed equality with God and thus is not part of a Trinity.—John 3:16; 14:28; Revelation 11:15. >> Now, I've had the experience of talking to several JW's, and I have to say this, this does not at all sum up their belief. They say that yes Jesus is the son of God, but he is also a god in himself. The trinity is nothing to them. Honestly, which I don't get. They're claiming to be a monotheistic religion, but Jesus is not part of God... basically there is big god Jehovah, little gods Jesus and Holy Spirit... that's three gods right? Hmm... sounds a lot like the Egyptian religion.
2. Death is a result of sin inherited from the first man, Adam, who chose to disobey God. The original sin was not sex relations but was the deliberate disobedient act of eating of "the tree of the knowledge of good and bad." The dead are conscious of nothing. In the future, God through Jesus will resurrect the dead.—Genesis 2:17; Ecclesiastes 9:5, 10; John 11:25; Romans 5:12. >> Wow, that would suck! You die and you're just there in the ground, dead... you know nothing you think of nothing... that's horrible man. Seriously I would say hate for that to be the truth. Oh, and only so many can get into Heaven. So, they don't even say they're going to Heaven. They'll die, know nothing, then go back to this horrible earth... lovely.
3. Jesus is God's appointed Judge who determines what each one's future will be. Those judged righteous will be given everlasting life on a paradise earth. Those judged unrighteous will not be tormented but will die and cease to exist. Humans are not responsible for this judgment, nor will they be involved when God takes action to remove all wickedness from the earth.—Proverbs 2:21, 22; John 5:22; Acts 17:30, 31; Revelation 21:3, 4. >> Wait, didn't they say that we can get salvation from Jesus? Apparently not. If you ask them, they'll say no. You can do good, love God all you want, but you still might be going to Hell. And those who may be horrid could be going to Heaven. Another sad part of their religion.
4. The earth will never be destroyed or depopulated but will become a peaceful paradise.—Psalm 37:29; Isaiah 45:18; Luke 23:43. >> I agree to disagree... God will make a new earth. Does that mean this one will leave? Maybe, maybe not. It could be as easy and him just making it all nice like it was, or destroying it only to make a perfect one again.
5. Abortion: This is a matter of personal choice. Life begins at conception. Deliberately induced abortion is viewed as the willful taking of human life.—Exodus 21:22, 23. >> They just contradicted themselves. The Bible says that killing is wrong... sure there is NO verse that directly says abortion is wrong, but honestly I don't think there needs to be. God doesn't see a difference between a fetus and a baby 8 months old. They're the same to him.
6. Jehovah's Witnesses believe that it is their Christian responsibility to be model citizens. For this reason, they honor and respect governmental authority. Only on those rare occasions when a government demands what is in direct conflict with what God commands do Jehovah's Witnesses decline to comply. Their publications and public ministry encourage everyone to be law-abiding.—Matthew 22:17-21; Acts 5:29; Romans 13:1-7. >> But why? If you're not going to Heaven and you're not going to know anything when dead... why does it matter?
7. Jehovah's Witnesses are found at all levels of society, and they do not physically separate themselves from those who do not share their beliefs. They live, work, and go to school with people of different religious beliefs, and they enjoy cordial relationships with them. Jehovah's Witnesses follow Jesus' example of being "no part of the world" by avoiding the unchristian prejudices and controversies that divide mankind today. Although not ascetics, they avoid being excessive in the pursuit of wealth, pleasure, or prominence.—John 17:15, 16; 1 John 2:15, 16. >> But the Bible also says that you and your relations should not be unequally yoked. This means that one should not be believer and the other not. It actually says to beware of those who are non believers and don't let them influence you, but you influence them.
8. Christians are commanded to "abstain from . . . blood." Since the Bible makes no clear statement about the use of minor blood fractions or the immediate re-infusion of a patient's own blood during surgery, a medical process known as blood salvaging, the use of such treatments is a matter of personal choice. Jehovah's Witnesses accept reliable non-blood medical alternatives, which are increasingly recognized in the medical field.—Acts 15:19, 20, 28, 29; compare Genesis 9:3, 4; Leviticus 17:10-14. >> "abstain from ... blood." What are they talking about!? Those passages are talking, STRICTLY about the impurities of certain sins. That one should not taste the blood of one sacrificed to idols (not God), or animals that have been strangled and blood from sexual impurity. They are talking nothing of sharing blood. So they'd rather risk their lives because they think that's what it means? Wow.
9. Agreeing to an organ transplant or organ donation is a personal decision. >> But wait, they think blood transfusions are wrong? You know, with medical science today, blood and organs are so clean, there is minimal risk (unless your body decides that it's a foreign object, which does happen).
10. The Bible does not require that extraordinary, complicated, or distressing measures be taken to sustain a person if this would merely prolong the dying process. Any advance directives by the patient should be respected. >> Why would they care? They don't know anything when they die anyways. So, if you have a chance to live why not keep them alive? Weird. Let me just say this, as well. I do applaud JW's in their search for knowledge and their deep study into the scriptures. However, they're interpreting it way off base.
http://www.jw-media.org/index.html
http://www.watchtower.org/
Beliefs of Jews:
1. G-d will reward the good and punish the wicked. >> Uh, no one is "good" under the standards of God.
2. The Messiah will come. >> Jesus wasn't the Messiah, just a man. Wow, how awful for them to say that.
3. G-d is a unity. He is a single, whole, complete indivisible entity. He cannot be divided into parts or described by attributes. Any attempt to ascribe attributes to G-d is merely man's imperfect attempt to understand the infinite. >> There is no Trinity, Jesus is NOT God which he claims to be. They dismiss what Jesus has said and say it is a fallacy of man. Interesting.
4. We are forbidden to represent G-d in a physical form. That is considered idolatry. The sin of the Golden Calf incident was not that the people chose another deity, but that they tried to represent G-d in a physical form. >> I just think that's interesting. Honestly. I don't know why. We don't know if God has a form or not. I mean, He did show himself to Moses in the form of a non-burning fire. He let one other, I think Solomon, see him and he became blind. The Bible says those who see or hear God will fall to their knees and be blinded by his glory.
http://www.jewfaq.org
http://www.religionfacts.com/judaism/beliefs.htm
SO HERE is what I am just pointing out. These religions are NOT Christian, although they claim to be. Not saying that one in the religion isn't Christian. I am simply saying that their beliefs are not of the Christian belief. In Judaism there is one exception; Messianic Jews/Completed Jews.
The reason I say this is because of a few things. They don't believe Jesus is God AND the Son of God. They don't even believe he was the Son of God (JW's and Jews). They listen to one who was obviously out of his mind (Mormonism). Their beliefs contradict the main beliefs of all Christian religions.
Questions? Ask away. Comments? Don't be mean. Seriously, I mean it.
Thank you and goodnight! *GOD BLESS*




i am a Christian and i am always researching other religions not because i dnt hav faith in my own but i want to be perpared wen i witness to people. ive been hit upside the head with some CRAZY beliefs!! i dnt want to judge others because i mostly assume they grew up the way they are like i hav grown up a christian but whenever i explain the basics of christianity there is never a FACT[[key word..everything in the word of god can be proven!!]] that they can tear down and disprove. it feels great knowing i hav the one tru god behind me!
god bless..ashley
Life is worth Loving
All you need to know about the Jehovah's Witnesses is that they say "Jesus had his return to power" aka his second coming in the year 1914.
The Watchtower is an oppressive cult if there ever was one!
It's amazing they are still around after 100 years of 100% failed prophecies. Truly amazing,that they can prompt their followers to actually go door to door with a 100% bogus message.
The Watchtower is a truly Orwellian world.
They will extol and preach "God's Kingdom" and this sounds attractive,what they hide from you is their Watchtower cult version that Jesus has already had his second coming in 1914 and is working "invisibly" through them,and all other religions are of Satan
Debunking the Jehovah's Witnesses propaganda:
A) They are at your door to recruit you for enslavement to their watchtower corporation,they will say that "we are just here to share a message from the Bible" this is deception right off.
B) The 'message' is their false Gospel that Jesus had his second coming already in 1914.The problem with this,is it's not just a cute fairy tale,Jesus warned of the false prophets who would claim "..look he is here in the wilderness,or see here he is at the temple"
C) Their anti-blood transfusion ban has killed hundreds if not thousands
D) once they recruit you they will "love bomb" you in cult fashion to also recruit your family & friends or cut them off. There are many more dangers,Jehovah's Witnesses got a bad rap for good and valid reasons.
----
Danny Haszard Jehovah's Witness X 33 years and 3rd generation
http://jehovahwitness.blogstream.com/
-tell the truth don't be afraid-Danny Haszard
Watchtower Counter-Cult mega pages. http://www.freeminds.org
Well,they reject the Trinity creed,but then go off and say that Jesus is the Archangel Michael.
The poster above is correct about them saying Jesus had his second coming in 1914 and only they saw it.
Yes,the watchtower is an esoteric man-made NON christian sect
Our blood transfusion prohibition law is so complex that the average rank and file Jehovah's Witness can't comprehend it.Why can some fractions of blood be used but not other parts? Is this from the Bible or made up by men?
People are dying over it!
They want to be kosher. Kosher means nothing of something else touching. Meaning, to be truly kosher is to keep your peas separate from your potatoes. That's why they want it that way. Is it from the Bible? No. They misread what the text said and was talking about. People are dying over it, that's a fact. If you need a blood transfusion and they say no because the Bible doesn't allow it, they'll die. Applause to you.
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
REGARDING THE WATCHTOWER SOCIETY OVER JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES:
Hoping to cover their shocking pedophile scandals, for October 2007 they put out an Awake! magazine titled "Keep Your Children SAFE!” They do not want regular JWs and their Elders to know Associated Press reports of May 10, 2007 show they had to settle with 16 child abuse victims, the exact payments hushed by gag orders but possibly up to $3.5 million per victim. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlRHaO0y4ro
Awake! also doesn’t say they keep sending all JWs including so-called “repentant” pedophiles preaching door to door alongside mostly unsuspecting JW women, men and kids. All churches have some pedophiles but none sends so many high risk persons to the public’s doors in contrast to Luke 10:7 saying do not be transferring house to house. Christ and apostles went from a friendly house in one town to one in another, not every door. “Repentant” or not, pedophiles often repeat offend and are far more likely to be involved in crimes such as harassment and peeping Tom spying.
Watchtower says Acts 15:20’s “abstain from blood” isn’t just about religious food rituals but emergency blood transfusions although Christ said “God wants mercy, not sacrifice” (Mt 12:7); and Saul's men were forgiven for eating unbled meat to stay alive (Read 1 Samuel 14:32-35). JW Elders order those JWs shunned who “unrepentantly” get a blood transfusion but yet hypocritically must let JWs get organ transplants which also have blood in them. Identical twins transfuse each other via a shared placenta – God’s own arrangement. One estimate is that 3 JWs somewhere on earth bleed to death daily.
Futher, the Watchtower Society oppose holidays even though Colossians 2:16 and Galatians 4:10 clearly say don’t “let anyone judge you” about holidays, and Galatians 5:22 says joy is good. The Watchtower Society men say Christians changing pagan customs to Christian objectives mixed "darkness with light," but Christians say it turned "darkness into light." Watchtower men say Santa Claus came from a god or wizard; but the Truth is he came from medieval gift-giver St Nicolaus of Myra who wore red and had a miter stick. Santa Claus is Dutch for St Nicholaus.
The Watchtower Society’s Governing Body men in Brooklyn say the cross was a “repugnant murder weapon” but Paul says boast of the cross as a symbol of resurrection’s victory over death. (Ga 6:14, 1 Cor 1:17-18) but JWs’ Governing Body men misteach it was a “repugnant murder weapon.” Archaeology shows it was a cross, not stake as JWs are also taught to misteach. Crucifixion takes hours as Luke 23:44 and Matthew 27:45-6 say not minutes as would be by stake. Greek "stauros" means cross or stake never just stake. Christians use rabbits and eggs as new life or resurrection symbols not as a fertility rite vestige like JWs are told to teach.
Christ and Paul say use “our Father” in heaven or “Abba” (Dad) - not a formal guessed at name renderings such as Jehovah or Yahweh. (Mt6:9; Ro 8:15, Ga4:6) A child named Johnny Doe calls who loves his father named William Doe does not call his father William or Bill but “Dad” or “Daddy.” God told Israel's tribes to not misuse His name so Christians and Jews use "Lord" in respect not in superstition as JWs are mistaught to misteach the public. Besides, when pedophiles, voyeurs etc preach at doors in God’s name, such public endangerment is obviously using God’s name in vain.
Paul says all have sinned so all die but JWs are mistaught that many loyal living JWs will never die and live forever on Paradise Earth, with only a Little Flock of JWs going to heaven although Revelation 19:1 says a "great crowd" is in heaven not just a little flock. Psalm 20:5 and Song of Solomon 2:4, 6:4,10 speak well of banners or flags as they show respect not idolatry as mistaught. JWs are mistaught other groups say God is 3 exact same persons in one person when the actual teaching is God is 3 different persons in one "Godship" or "divine nature," that is, an equal state of holiness. (Read Ro 1:20)
Watchtower has Elders use formal Judicial Committees of elders to judge other JWs for “wrongs” like dissenting on Bible teachings. They declare them disfellowshipped, that is shunned by other JWs including family and friends. Paul at 2 Corinthians 2:6 says a “majority,” therefore not all Christians at Corinth shunned a wrongdoer but the Watchtower Society insists all JWs must shun. Paul could order his relief worker Timothy but could not order Christians in general as to whom they must or must not all associate with. James wrote in opposition to any kind of formal harsh, rigid judging.
The Watchtower Society’s Governing Body says it’s “the faithful and discreet slave” over all Christians (Mt 24) but the Bible shows that role most belongs only to Jesus Christ, the only perfect and most faithful discreet slave of God. 1Timothy 3:16 calls scriptures the one perfect, inspired source of answers. The Watchtower Society says theirs is the one true faith Paul spoke of at Ephesians 4:5 about 2000 yrs ago but that “one faith” was universal general Christianity. JWs are mistold being fitly united requires having uniformity in all beliefs but Colossians 3:14 says the greatest bond of unity is LOVE not dictated same views. Romans14 gives freedom to differ.
If you find this informative, please mail a copy to JWs and JWs' Bible studies. It has saved lives. The Watchtower Society will be very displeased of course.
This could have been an enlightening piece, until you started LAUGHING at other religions.
http://www.progressiveu.org/user/bamers
OK, this is way too long to respond to in depth, so I will just repond to the Jewish part because I know most about that.
Keep in mind that I do think that the god displayed in the Old Testament is an incredibly evil deity.
Beliefs of Jews:
"1. G-d will reward the good and punish the wicked. >> Uh, no one is "good" under the standards of God." Well, it seems reasonable to me. Of course, most people do some bad things, but most people, I think, are genuinely good people, even if they do the occiasional misdeed. So, the god of the Jews does not expect perfection, something that he would know is impossible. Further more, these laws apply only to Jews. They don't expect non-Jews to follow these rules or to convert to Judaism after hearing about it. If that was the case, the circumstance of your birth would be how you were rewarded.
"2. The Messiah will come. >> Jesus wasn't the Messiah, just a man. Wow, how awful for them to say that." Why is it awful for them to say that. Jesus did not fufill the messianic prophesies. He did not bring about peace on Earth. The dead were not ressurected en masse and Israel wan't restored to the Jews till the 1950's. And, there were other people in that era claiming to be the Messiah. Jesus just had better press agents.
"3. G-d is a unity. He is a single, whole, complete indivisible entity. He cannot be divided into parts or described by attributes. Any attempt to ascribe attributes to G-d is merely man's imperfect attempt to understand the infinite. >> There is no Trinity, Jesus is NOT God which he claims to be. They dismiss what Jesus has said and say it is a fallacy of man. Interesting." Well, seeing as there is no evidence of god at all, I think that there is no reason to believe any of that. But, there is also no reason to accept what Jesus said is true over what they already believed was true. Seeing as Jesus didn't do what the Messiah was supposed to do, why should they believe him?
"4. We are forbidden to represent G-d in a physical form. That is considered idolatry. The sin of the Golden Calf incident was not that the people chose another deity, but that they tried to represent G-d in a physical form. >> I just think that's interesting. Honestly. I don't know why. We don't know if God has a form or not. I mean, He did show himself to Moses in the form of a non-burning fire. He let one other, I think Solomon, see him and he became blind. The Bible says those who see or hear God will fall to their knees and be blinded by his glory." Why? Why not? Why aren't men allowed to be homosexual? Why is the Sabboth on Saturday? Or is it Sunday?
"SO HERE is what I am just pointing out. These religions are NOT Christian, although they claim to be. Not saying that one in the religion isn't Christian. I am simply saying that their beliefs are not of the Christian belief. In Judaism there is one exception; Messianic Jews/Completed Jews.
The reason I say this is because of a few things. They don't believe Jesus is God AND the Son of God. They don't even believe he was the Son of God (JW's and Jews). They listen to one who was obviously out of his mind (Mormonism). Their beliefs contradict the main beliefs of all Christian religions."
Jews do not claim to be Christians. Judaism predated Christianity. If anything, Christians are Jews. OF course, I don't believe that either, but the only Jews who are Christians are the ones you say are. And, basically, that just means that they are Christians pretending to be Jews. Seeing as belief in Jesus as the Messiah or the Son of god does contradict Judaism.
"If religion were true, its followers would not try to bludgeon their young into an artificial conformity; but would merely insist on their unbending quest for truth, irrespective of artificial backgrounds or practical consequences."
H. P. Lovecraft
Right you are,Christians came from Jews,Jesus was a Jew and his 12 apostles. It's not fair to lump Jews in with modern cults like Jehovah's Witnesses
I never said Jesus wasn't a Jew. A Jew is a label on his nation and his religion. HOWEVER Christianity branched off and is now the religion that Jesus was. Why? Because Jesus was the messiah, the Jews see him as a man. That's a complete contradiction of what Jesus claimed himself. So yes, I can clump them, and it IS right to. I never said ANY of these religions were cults. No, that was you and others on this site. simply said they aren't Christian.
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
Jews don't claim to be Christians...they're their own seperate religion, different beliefs.
Ok, my problem with your whole Christianity thing is that have you ever looked at all the religions around you? If they all believe in one God, wouldn't that lead you to believe that maybe, just maybe there is a God and other cultures adapted him to their culture so that it worked out? I'm pretty sure that millions upon millions of people can't be wrong about a God, but I'm pretty sure all these manmade religions have distorted the idea of God enough for their own personal gains.
Maybe not all Jews, but they do claim it.
Yes, I have. I read my dad's books all the time (which no they aren't just written by religious scholars). Your saying a flaw. God cannot be adapted into cultures. God is set. One thing cannot be okay in one culture but bad in other, it's contradiction of God, the nature of God, and God's law.
They have distorted it. That's what I'm saying. I'm showing the flaws in them. There cannot be flaws in God or God's law. There isn't. The Bible shows that. We are all born with the love of God on our hearts and his name on our tongue. We all know who he is and what he wants. The corruptions are from lies we are told form Satan. I'm not saying that Christians are deaf these lies. However, we know they're lies. That's the difference. We understand what are lies form Satan about God and what aren't. Interpretation of the Bible is pretty individualistic, I will admit that. However, the search for truth will lead all to one point and one interpretation. That's what real Christians do, search for truth. I am still searching, but I know that God is the truth.
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
"Maybe not all Jews, but they do claim it."
Uh, I've never heard a Jew claim to be Christian and I know a lot of Jewish people.
"Yes, I have. I read my dad's books all the time (which no they aren't just written by religious scholars). Your saying a flaw. God cannot be adapted into cultures. God is set. One thing cannot be okay in one culture but bad in other, it's contradiction of God, the nature of God, and God's law."
You know what, you can believe what you want. I'm happy being a deist because it feels right to me and I'll keep telling people that whatever they believe feels right to them, is right. Just like I've said in my other blogs about religion.
"They have distorted it. That's what I'm saying. I'm showing the flaws in them. There cannot be flaws in God or God's law. There isn't. The Bible shows that. We are all born with the love of God on our hearts and his name on our tongue. We all know who he is and what he wants. The corruptions are from lies we are told form Satan. I'm not saying that Christians are deaf these lies. However, we know they're lies. That's the difference. We understand what are lies form Satan about God and what aren't. Interpretation of the Bible is pretty individualistic, I will admit that. However, the search for truth will lead all to one point and one interpretation. That's what real Christians do, search for truth. I am still searching, but I know that God is the truth."
There are flaws in the Bible because it's manmade. You can interpret the Bible upside down if you want, and you'll never come to a consensus among any religions on what is the right interpretation. Kinda like in the KJV of the Bible where it talks about unicorns and satyrs. But like I said, it's your beliefs. I'm entitled to mine and you're entitled to yours.
Translation has become flawed, yes, because the language back then was not as easy to decipher as the language today is. It is not flawed. Just because man wrote it doesn't mean it wasn't God's work. God used man to write it. He inspired it and breathed life into it.
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
Bahaha, I knew it. That's exactly what I meant. People interpret and translate what the Bible means for different things. Like when people translated and interpreted the Bible to go for slavery.
Christians can't even agree on what Bible is right. That's what makes all revealed religions suck, is that they all contradict themselves. But I'm done, this arguement I've had before and you and everyone else reverts to circular logic. so yeah, lol
One belief of Jehovah's Witnesses that wasn't mentioned is their worldwide practice of shunning. It has adversely affected literally millions of families.
Lying or using carefully chosen word camouflage to deceive members and the general public is the hallmark of a cult. Shunning is one example of how the Jehovah's Witnesses use cult deception:
It is widely known among millions of former Jehovah's Witnesses that their relatives shun those who (1) were never baptized as a Jehovah's Witness and (2) those who simply leave the organization but who commit no sin.
My friend falls into the first category. She was never baptized and yet her mother and brother (an Elder in the church) are currently shunning her. Unbelievably, they also shun her developmentally disabled daughter! Yes, this grandmother and uncle think it is "loving" to shun my friend's special needs child! I fall into the second category. I simply walked away and haven't heard from my family in over 25 years! When the Watchtower says on their website:
http://www.jw-media.org/beliefs/beliefsfaq.htm
"Those who become inactive in the congregation, perhaps even drifting away from association with fellow believers, are not shunned..."...
they are LYING. Plain and simple.
THE DOCUMENTATION from their own literature proves they are not only encouraged but expected to shun family members.
If you'd like to research other Watchtower quotes, email me through my website at www.outofthecocoon.net and I'll cite the various publications.
Also, click on the KNOCKING PREMIERE audio on my website and you will hear a Jehovah's Witness openly lying to the entire audience stating, "We don't shun family." Then hear me confront a JW Elder afterwards and listen to him dodge my question when I ask, "How do you feel about the fact that a Jehovah's Witness just lied?"
In addition, go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2O4lbgX81U and you will see an Elder using theocratic warfare in court on the witness stand!
The Watchtower's convention theme this year is "Follow The Christ." I ask you, is this--LYING AND SHUNNING--what Jesus would do???
Brenda Lee, "Out of the Cocoon: A Young Woman's Courageous Flight from the Grip of a Religious Cult" www.outofthecocoon.net
We are "sent" here? What does that mean? If we were already in Heaven, why would God honestly send us here? He has us already, that just makes absolute NO sense.
Why not? Where do the souls of children come from if they aren't with God?
Again, what? Basically they're saying that we can be as bad as we want, but if we accept Him as our salvation then we are okay?
I highly suggest you actually read what you're responding to. The sentence RIGHT BEFORE YOUR RESPONSE says "Because Jesus Christ paid the price for sin, we don’t have to [suffer] if we accept Him in our lives and live according to His teachings." So if you live according to Jesus' teachings, then you'll be ok. Living according to his teachings isn't be 'as bad as we want'. And most Christians do believe that as long as you accept Jesus as your savior, you'll go to heaven. The Mormons are saying that you have to do BOTH good works and accept him as your savior in order to get to Heaven. Sounds like the ideal Christian to me.
That just leads people to think that God PLANNED on us making mistakes and made us so that we would. Wrong again, we were made "perfect" but with free will. We sinned, there was our flaw.
By giving us free will (which is debatable in the first place), God made us so that we could make mistakes. If God was omniscient, he would have known that we would eat from the tree (which is why free will is debatable).
Wow, that would suck! You die and you're just there in the ground, dead... you know nothing you think of nothing... that's horrible man.
Why would that suck, exactly? Does the idea of Heaven and Hell offer comfort to you? The idea that people will burn for all eternity is comforting? Doesn't sound very comforting to me... I guess Christians are just selfish then ('as long as I get to heaven, it'll be ok').
They just contradicted themselves. The Bible says that killing is wrong... sure there is NO verse that directly says abortion is wrong, but honestly I don't think there needs to be. God doesn't see a difference between a fetus and a baby 8 months old. They're the same to him.
Again, I would suggest reading it. It says that it's personal choice, but having an abortion is a willful killing of another human. Thus, it is murder (and killing isn't wrong, murder is. The Bible gives plenty of accounts of people killing others, and it's not considered wrong). So you can choose to have an abortion, but you're committing murder by doing so. Goes back to that free will thing you believe.
"abstain from ... blood." What are they talking about!? Those passages are talking, STRICTLY about the impurities of certain sins.
Acts 15:20 says: Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood. {emphasis added}
Sounds pretty straight forward to me. The from in front of blood separates it from the rest of those lists.
You know, with medical science today, blood and organs are so clean, there is minimal risk (unless your body decides that it's a foreign object, which does happen).
I'm trying to figure out what you mean here. Blood is pretty easy to transfer, as long as you have the same type of blood. Organs, on the other hand, have to be much more carefully matched, because they contain nucleated cells. You have to take immune suppressants in order to get an organ transplant. It's hardly a 'minimal risk procedure. I think a great deal of the difference between blood transfusions and organ transplants is that organ donation usually occurs when you die. There are a few exceptions (kidneys, mostly), but they're pretty rare. So there isn't an exchange of blood when you give an organ, because the blood is no longer circulating in your body.
They don't know anything when they die anyways. So, if you have a chance to live why not keep them alive?
Because the procedures aren't worth it in the end? They're distressing, probably pretty expensive... so why only prolong the dying process and make someone suffer? It's not required by the Bible...
Uh, no one is "good" under the standards of God.
I'm surprised at you. You go onto jewfaq, which is a really good website, and you don't look up the standards for goodness for non-Jews. Allow me to give them to you.
According to traditional Judaism, G-d gave Noah and his family seven commandments to observe when he saved them from the flood. These commandments, referred to as the Noahic or Noahide commandments, are inferred from Genesis Ch. 9, and are as follows: 1) to establish courts of justice; 2) not to commit blasphemy; 3) not to commit idolatry; 4) not to commit incest and adultery; 5) not to commit bloodshed; 6) not to commit robbery; and 7) not to eat flesh cut from a living animal. These commandments are fairly simple and straightforward, and most of them are recognized by most of the world as sound moral principles. Any non-Jew who follows these laws has a place in the world to come.
Pretty easy to be good, then.
Jesus wasn't the Messiah, just a man. Wow, how awful for them to say that.
Why is it awful? Because you believe he was the Messiah? He didn't bring peace to the world (in fact, followers of him have done quite the opposite). He didn't rebuild the Temple (in fact, the second Temple was destroyed after he came). He certainly wasn't recognized by the world as the Messiah (else everyone would be Christians today). He was a teacher, but he was just a man.
There is no Trinity, Jesus is NOT God which he claims to be. They dismiss what Jesus has said and say it is a fallacy of man. Interesting.
The Messiah isn't supposed to be God. He's supposed to be a man. And they dismiss a lot of what he says because he wasn't following the teachings that God himself gave them (according to their beliefs). I'm a little confused about their idea of the Shechinah, but that's a discussion for another time.
These religions are NOT Christian, although they claim to be.
Most Jews make no claim that they are Christian. They don't want to be Christians, because that would be against their beliefs, despite the fact that there are a number of Christians trying to get them to 'convert'. So you really chose the wrong third religion.
~C
Read the news
Nominate a featured blogger!
God is a creator. We are created on earth, not in Heaven. So no, it doesn't make sense at all. We are not SENT here. We are born/created here.
Living according to his teachings can be anything. I can kill in the name of God because God wouldn't want those people alive. That's living in his teachings, cleansing the world. I know what I posted, and I meant it (not the killing part the part in my blog). As for good works, that's terrible because no one, NO ONE BUT GOD, can be perfect and do all good all the time. So the slightest sub-conscience thought we have can send us to damnation because it is not a good act, but we never really knew we did it.
Free will doesn't mean he made us to be sinners. He gave us the choice to follow or not to follow. Being omniscient would, yes, give him the knowledge. But what kind of love would that be? It's a forced love. He wants us to love him out of our own will, not because that's all we know. He still wanted us to be given the choice, which deep down he wanted us not to take, so we could love him.
Acts 15:20, read the amplified bible. It is talking about blood of animals and blood from sexual immorality, not BLOOD in itself.
Great deal of difference, yes, but still with todays science. I'm talking about the risk of getting an HIV or some other disease because of the blood or organ. Yes, the body will refuse the organ, if not for ever. But the risks of getting a disease transfered from it is minimal.
The 7 commandments were meant before Jesus' sacrifice. We had no salvation but to follow those commandments. After Jesus there was really no need for them in salvation, but to follow what God wants. God sets the standard of good. God is perfect and sets the standard of perfection. We as humans CANNOT reach this perfection without being in heaven.
It's awful because they're slapping God in the face. Jesus was/is God. Saying he was just a man is horrid. Also, that's horrid to think that just a man suffered all that for God and to show God's love. Not something God would do. God didn't sacrifice a man, he sacrificed himself.
Actually, a lot do claim to be. They claim that their God and the Christian God (not the trinity just God) are the same. I do my research, try again.
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
"God is a creator. We are created on earth, not in Heaven. So no, it doesn't make sense at all. We are not SENT here. We are born/created here." Where did angels come from?
"Living according to his teachings can be anything. I can kill in the name of God because God wouldn't want those people alive. That's living in his teachings, cleansing the world. I know what I posted, and I meant it (not the killing part the part in my blog)." How charming.
"Acts 15:20, read the amplified bible. It is talking about blood of animals and blood from sexual immorality, not BLOOD in itself." I think the belief comes from the idea of not eating human blood. I think it's stupid, but then again, well, you know.
"It's awful because they're slapping God in the face. Jesus was/is God. Saying he was just a man is horrid. Also, that's horrid to think that just a man suffered all that for God and to show God's love. Not something God would do. God didn't sacrifice a man, he sacrificed himself." Only if you are right, something that yo have no more evidence for than the Hebrew Faith.
"Actually, a lot do claim to be. They claim that their God and the Christian God (not the trinity just God) are the same. I do my research, try again." Ah, I think we have come to the root of the problem. The two gods, as well as the Islamic god, all have the same roots. They all originated with the Jewish faith. Christianity and Islam changed certain ideas about that god, but it is still the god who created the world in seven days. Each of those three religions believe that the other two have gotten it wrong and misunderstand that god. That is where the whole "same god" thing comes from.
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
Douglas Adams
"That is not dead which can eternal lie / And with strange aeons even death may die."
H. P. Lovecraft
Angels are not humans. Your point is no point.
Yes, but it's true. What do you think those Muslims who kill our soldiers or attack our buildings are doing? They're killing in the name of Allah.
Evidence: eyewitness accounts written down. I think that's evidence.
Yes, we rooted from the same. We didn't change, they did. They didn't believe Jesus when he said, "I am the son of God." That is where they stop being the religion of God and Jesus and become what we call Jews. Although Christians are the real Jews.
I like faeries. They're intriguing. But not real.
You're right, one is not dead in Heaven or hell. They live in eternal joy or eternal damnation. What's your choice?
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
"Angels are not humans. Your point is no point." My point is why can't god, if he exists, have created us in heaven and sent us to earth.
"Yes, but it's true. What do you think those Muslims who kill our soldiers or attack our buildings are doing? They're killing in the name of Allah." I'll ignore the political issues here. So what? It's disgusting no matter what god you claim to serve.
"Evidence: eyewitness accounts written down. I think that's evidence." When were these eyewitnesss accounts written down? Could the peeople have been wrong? Could they have been lying?
"Yes, we rooted from the same. We didn't change, they did. They didn't believe Jesus when he said, "I am the son of God." That is where they stop being the religion of God and Jesus and become what we call Jews. Although Christians are the real Jews." No one believed in Jesus till sometime during the early A.D. years. So, people who believe in Jesus were new. People who don't are old. The new came out of the old. That is change. How are you the real Jews? By saying that Jesus is the Messiah when he does not, in fact, fufill the messianic prophecies.
"I like faeries. They're intriguing. But not real." No less evidence exists for them than exists for your god.
"You're right, one is not dead in Heaven or hell. They live in eternal joy or eternal damnation. What's your choice?" Well, that quote is actually either reffering to the Crawling Chaos Nyarlathotep or the Great Old One, Cthulhu. Or maybe it is reffering to both...
I will not follow a god that cannot prove his existence to me. If that god does exist and seeks to punish me for it, well then he isn't worthy of my worship.
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
Douglas Adams
"That is not dead which can eternal lie / And with strange aeons even death may die."
H. P. Lovecraft
Yes, but no where in the Bible does it say we were created in Heaven. Besides, like I said, it is STUPID to create us up with him and send us back down just so we can reject him. He wants EVERYONE in Heaven. So if he creates us in Heaven, we're already there. Why would he send us down just so we could reject him if need be? See, it's stupid and pointless.
Yes, that's what I'm saying. God is the Standard, and we CANNOT measure up to it. We cannot just simply say by accepting him and living a life of good we'll be okay, because there is so much more than that.
The accounts were recorded later because, shit, it takes a while to write things down perfectly with no mistakes. They had lives of mission work. They had scribes write what they said. So it can be assumed they took awhile to finally get it all down. Could they have been lying? No. The Bible is God's work, inspired by God and written by God through the hand of man.
You are so misled. People believed in the savior, in the promise God gave Adam and Eve when they sinned. No, they didn't know Jesus was his name, but they still believed in him. And yes, he fulfills EVERY single one of them. Which one hasn't he? Tell me?
Wrong again. The only difference is, what is evidence you will not take as evidence because it is "biased" towards the religion. Doesn't make sense. Evidence is evidence. Everything can be disputed and second guessed.
Again, he is not punishing you. Damn. You, and I, and everyone else in the world has a curse. A curse that our blood brought upon us. Adam and Eve sinned. Everything after that was sin. Sex became an act of lust and emotion, not what it should have been just to populate. So sex was/is a sin. We then were conceived by sin, which made us sinners. The curse will follow the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve. God promised us a savior (Jesus) so that we could be in paradise again. So NO he is not punishing you. You're choosing not to be saved. You're choosing not to be sterile so that you can enter a sterile place. He wants you in Heaven, not Hell. He cries for those in Hell. But he cannot do anything about it, it would go against everything that he is and infect him which is impossible.
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
"Yes, but no where in the Bible does it say we were created in Heaven. Besides, like I said, it is STUPID to create us up with him and send us back down just so we can reject him. He wants EVERYONE in Heaven. So if he creates us in Heaven, we're already there. Why would he send us down just so we could reject him if need be? See, it's stupid and pointless." If he wants us all in heaven it seems kind of stupid to have us on Earth first.
"Yes, that's what I'm saying. God is the Standard, and we CANNOT measure up to it. We cannot just simply say by accepting him and living a life of good we'll be okay, because there is so much more than that." So, by being good and believing, you are still going to hell?
"The accounts were recorded later because, shit, it takes a while to write things down perfectly with no mistakes. They had lives of mission work. They had scribes write what they said. So it can be assumed they took awhile to finally get it all down. Could they have been lying? No. The Bible is God's work, inspired by God and written by God through the hand of man." Could they have been lying or wrong? Yes. How do we know it is god's work, only because it says it is.
"You are so misled. People believed in the savior, in the promise God gave Adam and Eve when they sinned. No, they didn't know Jesus was his name, but they still believed in him. And yes, he fulfills EVERY single one of them. Which one hasn't he? Tell me?" A, the messiah was never the son of god. The messiah was a) to bring peace to the world, b) restore the dominance of the people of Israel and c) would cause the dead to return to life. NONE OF THESE THINGS HAPPENED!
"Again, he is not punishing you. Damn. You, and I, and everyone else in the world has a curse. A curse that our blood brought upon us. Adam and Eve sinned. Everything after that was sin. Sex became an act of lust and emotion, not what it should have been just to populate. So sex was/is a sin. We then were conceived by sin, which made us sinners. The curse will follow the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve. God promised us a savior (Jesus) so that we could be in paradise again. So NO he is not punishing you. You're choosing not to be saved. You're choosing not to be sterile so that you can enter a sterile place. He wants you in Heaven, not Hell. He cries for those in Hell. But he cannot do anything about it, it would go against everything that he is and infect him which is impossible." So, he considers a sin that which propegates mankind as well as holding against us the actions of Adam and Eve? Seems like he wants the odds stacked against us, huh?
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
Douglas Adams
"That is not dead which can eternal lie / And with strange aeons even death may die."
H. P. Lovecraft
Wow, you are so not reading/understanding my words. If we were all in Heaven in the first place and had no choice to choose him then it wouldn't be a strong real love from us. He wants us to LOVE HIM by our choice. We cannot have free will in Heaven. At the same time he wants us all in Heaven. THEREFORE, we are created on Earth so that we have free will to chose him or not and to love him fully.
NO that's not what I'm saying at all. There is more to just doing "good" (which we don't do all the time and that's what their religion wants us to do) all the time and believing. Much more.
That's were faith comes in.
The messiah was the son of God. He said it, he rose from the dead, and he is in heaven. He WILL bring peace to the world. It's call the ending days/judgement. Dominance, again, is in the ending days. And the dead is, AGAIN, the ending days. It isn't the ending days!
No, he doesn't want the odds stacked up against us. IT'S A CURSE. We are cursed! We cursed ourselves. We are sinners because we are born into sin and have no chance of not knowing sin. The only way not to know sin or feel its effect is to be in Heaven.
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
"If we were all in Heaven in the first place and had no choice to choose him then it wouldn't be a strong real love from us. He wants us to LOVE HIM by our choice. We cannot have free will in Heaven. At the same time he wants us all in Heaven. THEREFORE, we are created on Earth so that we have free will to chose him or not and to love him fully." I could be sitting next to god, claiming he doesn't exist and rejecting him. I'd have to be amazingly stupid to do that, but I could.
"NO that's not what I'm saying at all. There is more to just doing "good" (which we don't do all the time and that's what their religion wants us to do) all the time and believing. Much more." So, other than doing good deeds and believing in your god and Jesus, what do you have to do to get into heaven?
"The messiah was the son of God. He said it, he rose from the dead, and he is in heaven. He WILL bring peace to the world. It's call the ending days/judgement. Dominance, again, is in the ending days. And the dead is, AGAIN, the ending days. It isn't the ending days!" But that was not the Jewish idea of the Messiah. That is my point. The Messiah, according to the Jews was a man (not a god) who brought about these things when he was alive.
"No, he doesn't want the odds stacked up against us. IT'S A CURSE. We are cursed! We cursed ourselves. We are sinners because we are born into sin and have no chance of not knowing sin. The only way not to know sin or feel its effect is to be in Heaven." Well, then, why doesn't the guy just remove being born from his list of sins?
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
Douglas Adams
"That is not dead which can eternal lie / And with strange aeons even death may die."
H. P. Lovecraft
Yes, we rooted from the same. We didn't change, they did.
Excuse me? The Jews are the ones still practicing the Old Testament... the Christians are the ones that cherry pick what they want to believe. The God of the Old Testament sounds horrible compared to the God of the New Testament (in most ways, anyway). Sounds to me like the Christians were the ones to change.
They didn't believe Jesus when he said, "I am the son of God."
David was the son of God. II Samuel 7:14: I will be to him a father, and he shall be to Me a son; so that when he goes astray I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the sons of Adam.
I'm fairly certain that Jesus said I am God, as well. Least, that's what a traveling pastor said in a lecture I went to...
That is where they stop being the religion of God and Jesus and become what we call Jews.
Actually, "Jew" comes from the Latin 'judaeus', which comes from the Hebrew 'yehudi', which means inhabitant of the kingdom of Judah. All known Jews today are from two or three tribes (I think it's three... Judah, Benjamin, and Levi, but Levi is the priests, not considered an actual tribe of Israel). They were of the kingdom of Judah after the 12 tribes split and the 10 northern tribes were lost after being conquered by the Assyrians in 722 BC. So 'Jews' predate Christianity, by quite a bit.
Although Christians are the real Jews.
Because they follow a man that doesn't even fulfill the prophecies of the Jewish Messiah. Good job.
~C
Read the news
Nominate a featured blogger!
Haha, wow. Okay, the OT really has no effect after the savior came but to show us the prophecies that he fulfilled and to show more of his love. The OT had laws to follow because there was no other way to repent. Jesus was our repentance and the laws were seen has the law of God of doing good, not salvation. We do not cherry pick. Tell me what we cherry pick?
Let us look at the words in greek and what they meant. First of all, David was the son of God in that he was a believer and follower of God and adopted son of God. Jesus was GOD and the BLOOD of God. HUGE difference. I am a daughter of God only by adoption because I have let him into my heart. If you look at what words they used and the original context you'll see that David was saying "I am an adopted son of God for I believe and have let him in my heart."
Tell me what prophecies doesn't he fulfill!? He fills them all!!! I am astonished at your ignorance of that.
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
Look around at what passages out of the OT Christians use to back up their beliefs. A number of them concern homosexuality (those in Leviticus especially). Cherry picking.
How can Jesus be the BLOOD of God when God isn't human? Was God like Zeus and his magical sperm made their way into Mary while she was sleeping?
You want prophecies, hmm?
"And when your days (David) are fulfilled, and you shall sleep with your fathers, I will set up your seed after you, who shall issue from your bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for my name, and I will make firm the throne of his kingdom forever..." (2 Samuel 7:12 - 13) - Jesus must be a descendant of both David and Solomon (I'd have to look a little for the Solomon reference, cause the text I have doesn't given chapter and verse). Two genealogies are given. The first goes to Joseph, who isn't even the father of Jesus. The other (which I guess is Mary's lineage) was traced back through Nathan.
"And he shall set up a banner for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth." (Isaiah 11:12) - Jesus had to bring back the Jews to Israel... Hasn't happened.
"And David my servant shall be king over them; and they shall all have one shepherd. they shall also follow My judgments and observe My statutes, and do them. And they shall dwell in the land that I have given to Jacob my servant, in which your fathers have dwelt and they shall dwell there, they and their children, and their children's children forever; and my servant David shall be their prince forever. Moreover, I will make a covenant of peace with them, it shall be an everlasting covenant with them, which I will give them; and I will multiply them and I will set my sanctuary in the midst of them forevermore. And my tabernacle shall be with them: and I will be their G-d and they will be my people. Then the nations shall know that I am the L-rd who sanctifies Israel, when My sanctuary will be in the midst of them forevermore." (Ezekiel 37:24-28)
Ok, so people are supposed to follow God's laws. Those he gave in the Torah. Last I checked, only the most observant Jews do that... in fact, Christians often completely disregard those statutes. Again, the messiah is supposed to bring all the Jews back to Israel... hasn't happened. The messiah was supposed to build the Temple. The Temple was destroyed after Jesus died.
Let me guess, though. Jesus is conveniently going to fulfill all these at the second coming. How convenient.
So, in exchange for all that, I'd like you to point out the parts in the OLD TESTAMENT where the prophets say that the messiah will be anything more than a good teacher and man.
~C
Read the news
Nominate a featured blogger!
That's not cherry picking for the entire religion. That's just those who do it. Don't clump us all together. I DO NOT cherry pick. But still. Homosexuality is mentioned in the NT. That in the OT and NT is still used and seen as law of God. And how does that show cherry picking?
He is 100% God because his father is God, 100% Human because his mother is human. Now, the reason they gave two references was because of the legal reference. The Jews back then were very legal term literate. Jesus was Joseph's Legal son, not biological. Joseph (Mat. 1:1-17) AND Mary (Lk. 3:23-28 *many think this is referring to Mary's*) were descendants of David. Nathan is the Son of David. Both Mary and Joseph can be traced back to that. Joseph was a descendant of Solomon. 2 Sam. 7:8-17 (the dividic covenant) this is what was promisd. Verse 12 is talking of Solomon not of Jesus. It is predicting the birth of Solomon. It doesn't say that Jesus has to come from Solomon, where are you finding that. The legal, the thrown, came through Solomon through Joseph. The seed came from David through Mary, not the thrown. The thrown is talking of the legal and royal lineage which came through the LEGAL father. The Genetics came through the mother, the seed (Gen. 3:15 *very first prophecy 'came from HER seed'*). So what is wrong with this prophecy? He fulfilled that. That is VERY precise. It can't be anything BUT Jesus.
Is. 11:12; some believe this occurred in 1948 when Israel became a nation and many Jews went back. Others believe this is GOING to happen in the coming of days. If it happens in the coming of days you cannot claim that he hasn't done it and won't do it and therefore isn't God/the messiah. Why? The End isn't here yet. So, what's wrong with that one?
When Jesus said "Destroy this temple and I will raise it up in three days," He was talking about himself. HE WAS/IS the temple. Jesus was never to establish an earthly kingdom, HE IS OUR HEAVENLY ETERNAL KING. If you don't get that you don't get Christianity. Jews are looking for an earthly kingdom. JESUS is the fulfillment of the law and the prophecy. That's the problem. The Jews have to keep everything. Sacrificing a perfect lamb back in Gen. was a picture of sacrificing Jesus THE PERFECT LAMB. We can't keep ALL THE LAWS as set in the OT. So we put our faith in the PERFECT One who kept ALL the laws then sacrificed himself to be our perfect and perpetual sacrifice. ALL OF THE LAW as been fulfilled in Jesus. Not all the Prophecies have been fulfilled yet. There is still the second coming.
There are hundreds of Messianic Prophecies, many in Psalms. I cannot give you a complete list but here are SOME of the prophecies and where you can find them:
>The Messiah will be the Son of God -- Ps. 2:7
>The Messiah will be raised from the dead -- Ps. 16:10-11
>The Messiah and his crucifixion *prophecised before they knew what crucifixion was* -- Ps. 22 *this also holds 11 prophecies*
>The Messiah will ascend to heaven at the right hand of God -- Ps. 68:18
>The great kings will pay homage and tribute to the Messiah -- Ps. 72:10, 11
>The Messiah will be descendant of David -- Ps. 132:11; Jer. 23:5-6 & 33:15-16
>The Messiah will be born of a virgin -- Is. 7:14
>People will hear and not believe the "arm of the LORD" -- Is. 53:1
>The Messiah will be buried with the rich -- Is. 53:9
>The Messiah is part of the new and everlasting covenant -- Is. 55:3-4; Jer. 31:31-34
>The Messiah will be our intercessor -- Is. 59:16
>The Messiah will be called Zion of Israel -- Is. 60:14
Messianic Prophecies
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
He is 100% God because his father is God, 100% Human because his mother is human.
That would make him 50/50... If you have an Irish mother and a French father, you are not 100% Irish and 100% French... you are 50% Irish and 50% French.
Jesus was Joseph's Legal son, not biological.
Ok, show me where it says an adopted son will acquire the status of his father? Converts aren't part of the 12 tribes in the OT unless they are women and marry into them.
It doesn't say that Jesus has to come from Solomon, where are you finding that.
Again, READ. The Solomon part doesn't come from that verse. I said that in my commentary. It comes from... I Kings 11:11-13 " 11. And the Lord said to Solomon, "For as this has been with you, and you have not observed My covenant and My statutes which I have commanded you, I will surely tear the kingdom from you, and I shall give it to your servant. 12. However, in your days I will not do this, for the sake of David your father; from the hands of your son I shall tear it. 13. But I shall not tear the entire kingdom away from you; one tribe I shall grant to your son for the sake of David My servant, and for the sake of Jerusalem, the city which I have chosen.
The Genetics came through the mother, the seed (Gen. 3:15 *very first prophecy 'came from HER seed'*).
Uhh... that's talking about the animosity between the serpent and man. I was under the impression that the first prophecy was done by... Jacob in his dying words to his sons. And the status comes through the mother... because Mary was Jew, Jesus was a Jew. That's all that came from the mother.
some believe this occurred in 1948 when Israel became a nation and many Jews went back.
I know many Jews that aren't in Israel, so that doesn't qualify.
So, what's wrong with that one?....Not all the Prophecies have been fulfilled yet. There is still the second coming.
It hasn't happened, and the Jews believe that the Messiah doesn't need a second go at it. Thus they reject the idea of a second coming. Thus, Jesus didn't fulfill the prophecies. Thus, he can't be the Messiah.
http://www.chabad.org/library/article.htm/aid/108400/jewish/The-End-of-D...
The Messiah will be the Son of God -- Ps. 2:7
It's talking about David... begotten you to be called My son and to be beloved to Me as a son for their sake, as it is stated (II Sam. 7:14) concerning Solomon: “I will be to him a father, and he shall be to Me a son.” We find further concerning David (Ps. 89:27) “He shall call Me, ‘You are my Father, my God, and the Rock of my salvation.’”
The Messiah and his crucifixion *prophecised before they knew what crucifixion was* -- Ps. 22 *this also holds 11 prophecies*
I see lots of prophecies there, but you're going to have to be more specific about the crucifixion one, because I don't see it. I also don't see many that have been fulfilled yet (again with the second coming stuff).
The Messiah will be born of a virgin -- Is. 7:14
Actually, the word is for 'young woman'. They were pretty much the same word in ancient Hebrew, because young, unmarried women were typically also virgins. But it's considered to mean 'young woman' and not 'virgin'.
I don't have time to look up the rest, as I have a lot of studying to do before my midterms this week.
~C
Read the news
Nominate a featured blogger!
You are thinking on a human level, not a Godly level. God can do anything, remember. Jesus was 100% BOTH. Not half and half.
Simple, my friend. In the Jewish culture an adopted son and legal rights to the name of his adopted father. Why do you think we call ourselves the Sons and Daughters of Christ? We are not blood, we are adopted into Christ's family. The Jewish culture was that if one died childless, the near relative's son could take BOTH names and claim both statues of the names. Is it IN the Bible, that I will have to look for. Even if it isn't, it is assumed because of the culture of the time.
I answered your Solomon question, I didn't need to know where to answer it. I was just curious.
If you don't think the very first prophecy was that he'd come from her seed, then you don't understand what was written.
If you don't see the prophecies than you REALLY don't understand how they wrote back then. PSALMS is all poem/song. So yes, it will explain/talk of things in poetic form. You have to read the surrounding text to understand it.
It's to mean virgin. If she wasn't a virgin than Jesus could not be born free of sin (sex is a sin). If she WASN'T a virgin, she would have been cast out a long time ago for either being a prostitute or premarital sex. That is why, if you read, Joseph was ashamed and couldn't believe that she was still a virgin when pregnant with Jesus. That is why he wanted to shun her almost until an angel came and told him it is true!
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
If you don't think the very first prophecy was that he'd come from her seed, then you don't understand what was written.
Or you're looking into things too deeply. Ever talk to a poet after analyzing his work?
If you don't see the prophecies than you REALLY don't understand how they wrote back then. PSALMS is all poem/song.
No shit, sherlock. I notice how you don't answer my question, though. Good job.
You have to read the surrounding text to understand it.
I read the entire poem, thank you very much.
It's to mean virgin. If she wasn't a virgin than Jesus could not be born free of sin (sex is a sin).
If sex is a sin, why is it a commandment to be fruitful and multiply? Kinda contradictory, don't you think? The word means young woman.
If she WASN'T a virgin, she would have been cast out a long time ago for either being a prostitute or premarital sex.
My point exactly. She and Joseph had to go to Egypt, did they not? Sounds like being cast out to me....
~C
Read the news
Nominate a featured blogger!
No, I'm not. And if you didn't know I AM A POET. Have YOU ever talked to a real poet after analyzing their work? The Mind of the Jew back then was VERY deep.
I answered your question. If you look and can't find it sad for you. But you're smart enough, so you keep saying, that you DO in fact understand them. So then you should be able to find it.
Not just the one poem, ALL OF THE BIBLE
Because God wants us to multiply. Before we ate from the tree sex was just to multiply. Today, after our sin, sex is an emotional lust event. However, you should with the one you love, your husband/wife TO multiply, not to have it as an emotional high.
But Joseph would have cast her out from him and ignored her completely, which he didn't.
My Oberon! what visions have I seen! / Methought I was enamoured of an ass. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act IV, Scene I, Line 77-78
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their
"No, I'm not. And if you didn't know I AM A POET. Have YOU ever talked to a real poet after analyzing their work? The Mind of the Jew back then was VERY deep."
Whoa, are you saying that Jews are unable to think deep? A little racist don't you think?
You COMPLETELY misread what I was saying. Actually you took the OPPOSITE of what I was saying.
My Oberon! what visions have I seen! / Methought I was enamoured of an ass. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act IV, Scene I, Line 77-78
You said that back then JEws were pretty deep. That tacitly implies that today they aren't. I don't think you mean that, though.
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
Douglas Adams
"That is not dead which can eternal lie / And with strange aeons even death may die."
H. P. Lovecraft
I am first and foremost going to ask you to read again. Thanks.
God is a creator. We are created on earth, not in Heaven. So no, it doesn't make sense at all.
So you believe that all souls are created on earth? I don't... but then again, I believe in a lot of things that you don't.
Living according to his teachings can be anything. I can kill in the name of God because God wouldn't want those people alive.
Did Jesus condone killing? If so, please do cite the passage where it says that, thanks. They believe that you must follow the teachings of JESUS, which are laid out pretty specifically in the Bible, don't you think?
Free will doesn't mean he made us to be sinners. He gave us the choice to follow or not to follow. Being omniscient would, yes, give him the knowledge.
Don't start talking about something without knowing the full background. I'm not talking about the omniscient thing at this time, it's just a conundrum that many people have tried to deal with.
God made us with the ability to go against his teachings, and he made something that did go against his teachings. We were tempted by it, and sinned. Thus, God made us able to sin.
Acts 15:20, read the amplified bible. It is talking about blood of animals and blood from sexual immorality, not BLOOD in itself.
And you have just stumbled upon the problem of interpretation. What makes the translation I used less valid than the translation you use? It doesn't, and that's why we have so many different versions, and why we interpret so much. I don't think the JWs are right in refusing blood transfusions, but that's their belief. I'm sure you think it's barbaric to circumcise, or think it's stupid to separate meat from milk, but people follow those beliefs all the time.
The 7 commandments were meant before Jesus' sacrifice.
You said, and I quote "Uh, no one is "good" under the standards of God." I gave you the specific ways that God saw people as good according to the Jews. You're arguing from their views, so you should allow for all of their views. The laws in the Torah are not intended for non-Jews, end of story.
After Jesus there was really no need for them in salvation, but to follow what God wants. God sets the standard of good. God is perfect and sets the standard of perfection.
You'll notice that I never said people would be perfect by following the Noahic laws... just good. If he wanted us to be perfect on earth, he should have created us to be perfect. But he didn't.
It's awful because they're slapping God in the face. Jesus was/is God.
According to YOUR beliefs, yes. But that's what they believe. Try to avoid value judgments when looking at the facts of other religions. I still don't know why you included Jews in that, because the vast majority of them are not Christian, and those that are were most likely seduced into by Christians that were lying to them. Oops... that was a value judgment, huh?
Also, that's horrid to think that just a man suffered all that for God and to show God's love.
Ever read Job? Same concept. What about Joseph?
Actually, a lot do claim to be. They claim that their God and the Christian God (not the trinity just God) are the same.
Yeah, the Christians took the God of the Old Testament and made him a nicer god. Except for the human sacrifice thing. That's pretty much the same. The Jews reject the idea of a Trinity, and so they don't believe Jesus was any more the son of God than anyone else (with the possible exception of David). In fact, there are three relationships Jews have with God: father/son, brothers, and partners, I believe. It's been a while since I looked into that, so the actual roles may be a little off, but there are three roles. Many Jewish scholars don't think Christianity is a monotheistic religion because of the Trinity. It's a corruption of Judaism by the Gentiles.
I do my research too.
~C
Read the news
Nominate a featured blogger!
"The laws in the Torah are not intended for non-Jews, end of story." I wonder where that leaves me...
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
Douglas Adams
"That is not dead which can eternal lie / And with strange aeons even death may die."
H. P. Lovecraft
The change of your avatar confused me.
I'm not entirely sure where it leaves you either. Of course, my ideas for your life after death are a heck of a lot more pleasant than Queen T's. I imagine your fate is something like your soul being cut off from your people. So you won't be with your family in the afterlife? *shrugs*
~C
Read the news
Nominate a featured blogger!
I thought I would just sort of wait around in non-existence until the messiah came. Oh well, I've been meaning to get away from most of those people for years! :-)
Or maybe I'm officially non-Jewish now...
The icon is a cute, plastic little GREAT OLD ONE called Cthulhu, who, once freed from his prison beneath the sea will destroy humanity!!!!!!
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
Douglas Adams
"That is not dead which can eternal lie / And with strange aeons even death may die."
H. P. Lovecraft
Jehovah's Witnesses are permitted by the Watchtower Society-appointed elders to ge organ transplants, and those have blood in them. So they approved blood usage even while saying they don't which is hypocrisy and a lie.
Acts 15:20 says abstain from blood but the context shows it's talking about food and religious ritual.
JWs should be allowed to free choose if or if not to take blood transfusions but now they are told, like a gun to the head, that if they do they will be shunned by all JW family and friends. This is not "choice" by force, coersion, duress. Hospital liaison committees of JW elders need to be barred to remove the duress.
Gen 9:5. It's about more than just food.
personally i have no religion that i strictly fallow. ive only been to chrch about 5 or 6 times in my life... more with friends than family. when i did go to church it was a protistant curch but i know absolutely nothing about it. and my friend went to two different churches because her parents didnt want to raise her in one way so they split it! but from what i read of your postings ive learned more than what i ever knew.
That is, honestly, what I am trying to do. Inform and educate. But along the way debates come up.
I hope you want to learn more. If you don't search for the truth you'll never find it fully.
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
A favorite doing of JW elders is to use Theocratic Warfare word tactics. They sometimes say "we don't SHUN" when they do but think it's a cute way to supposedly truthfully lie because they DISFELLOWSHIP not shun.
Outside of JWs only a few other groups teach TW usage, for example the Aryan Brotherhood (a quasi-religious criminal group) and Hare Krishnas. Regular grassroots JW members aren't knowledgeable about TW so will tell you it doesn't exist or get used among JWs; the elders sometimes use it on them too.
DIdn't the apostle Paul in the first century tell the believers in Corinth to disfellowship a false believer? Isn't that what 1 Cor 5 is about? Later he told them to let the expelled man back in. I'm not sure I get your point other than you don't believe that Paul was right.
Ok, lets try this. If there had been an internet in the days of Jesus and the early Christians and you did a Google search what would most of the sites be saying?
What would some to the topics be?
Here's one, "Jesus seen with prostitutes, "I was right there says one eyewitness, I saw all of it, and this guy is supposed to be the Christ? No way"!
Here is another:
Former carpenter now son of God advocates overthrow of Governent. A former follower had this to say, "Man, I could not believe my ears, but he said it, the Kingdom is in your midst, and I was like what do you mean? And he just said something like, "My kingdom is no part of this world". "Man, I want no part of a revolution, this guy is over the top". Says one former Christian Elder, "It is what I have been saying all along, this group is dangerous, we need to stamp them out. When they come to your door, just slam it in their face, they are a cult"!
Jesus advocates cannibalism. The so called Christ and son of God was recently quoted as saying that being a cannibal is ok, it is not a sin. An ear witness had this to say, "Man, I could not believe my ears, but he said it, "you must drink my blood and eat my body, I mean, what are we talking here, is there going to be like a McJesus or something, how can we all drink his blood and eat his flesh? I could not hear anymore and a bunch of us stopped following him".
One former Christian Elder had this to say, "It is like I have been telling you all along, this guy is a cult leader, and he his dangerous, we need to stop him. When they come to your door, just slam it in their face"!
Former servants of Jehovah disfellowshipped. A spokesman for the high priest had this to say, "We have one God and his name is Jehovah, we do not need to go through some self proclaimed Chirst to speak to our God, we have our temple and that is where any self respecting Jew will go. We want to put all Jews on notice, you follow this man, and you will be thrown out of the temple, you will lose your job, your friends and your family".
Says one former Christian Elder, who is still not welcome back at the temple, "It is what I have been saying all along, these people are dangerous, when they come to your door, slam it in their face, they are a cult".
Christians, stunned as their "King and Christ" is killed; Christians were reeling today after Jesus was put to death, says one former follower of the dead carpenter, "I kept waiting for Jehovah to save him, but nothing happened and now he is gone". When asked what he planned to do now he responded, "All I can do is hope to get my old job back, maybe my family will take me back in, and I plan to make a trip up to the temple to see the priest, I can only hope it is not too late". A spokesperson for Jesus Cultwatch had this to say, " Well, it is what we were saying all along, this guy was a fake, he used magic tricks, and with help from the darkside he was able to fool a few people, but after all he did, we can only number them at 120, clearly the methods he employed were not effective. And the door to door stuff, whoa, the average Jew hated them coming around every Saturday, man, it was a pain. We have set up counseling programs for all former Christ cult member's, if you want more information you can contact us at www.jesuscultwatch.org.".
A former Chistiian Elder had this to say, "It is what I have been saying all along, they kill children, they do not believe in Jehovah, and they are a cult, and now you will not have to worry because with him dead it is over! Next thing you know, they will be saying he is back from the dead, ha".
This just in, "Jesus back from dead says cult leaders..........
Do you get my point? All the bad things you are saying about Jehovah's Witnesses, you most likely would have said about Jesus and his followers or worse.
Now you try.
And the wisdom of God will be foolishness to man, and a stumbling block.
He has blinded their eyes and hardened and benumbed their [callous, degenerated] hearts [He has made their minds dull], to keep them from seeing with their eyes and understanding with their hearts and minds and repenting and turning to Me to heal them. John 12:40
And this same progeny of evils comes from our debate, from our dissension; We are their parents and original. -- A Midsummer Night's Dream Act II, Scene I, Lines 115-117
A few clarifications on what we really do believe:
1."basically there is big god Jehovah, little gods Jesus and Holy Spirit... that's three gods right? Hmm... sounds a lot like the Egyptian religion."
There is only one God, the Father. Jesus is Gods son. The Holy Spirit is not a god, its Gods spirit.
2. "They'll die, know nothing, then go back to this horrible earth... lovely"
The dead know nothing: "For the living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all" - Ecclesiastes 9:5
But there will be a resurrection of the dead: "I have hope toward God, which hope these [men] themselves also entertain, that there is going to be a resurrection" - Acts 24:15
Those resurrected will not "go back to this horrible earth" but live in the new heaven or on the new earth: "there are new heavens and a new earth that we are awaiting according to his promise, and in these righteousness is to dwell." - 2 Peter 3:13
3. "Wait, didn't they say that we can get salvation from Jesus? Apparently not. If you ask them, they'll say no. You can do good, love God all you want, but you still might be going to Hell"
Yes you can get salvation from Jesus: "we wait for the happy hope and glorious manifestation of the great God and of [the] Savior of us, Christ Jesus, who gave himself for us that he might deliver us from every sort of lawlessness" - Titus 2:13
If you love God and serve him you will not go to hell: "For God is not unrighteous so as to forget YOUR work and the love YOU showed for his name, in that YOU have ministered to the holy ones and continue ministering. " - Hebrews 6:10
5. "Abortion: This is a matter of personal choice."
No it is not. God do regard human life, including the life of a fetus, as very valuable. We have no right to murder a unborn child. "And in case men should struggle with each other and they really hurt a pregnant woman and her children do come out but no fatal accident occurs, he is to have damages imposed upon him ........... But if a fatal accident should occur, then you must give soul for soul" - Exodus 21:22,23
Consider this - how many times in the bible are holidays mentioned? How many times is the word trinity mentioned?
The correct response to both is none.
I would argue the mainstream "christian" religions are not christian in the sense of following the teachings of christ.
This shouldn't be a surprise as Christ himself recognized this when he spoke what is recorded today as Matthew 7. Here he identifies the difficulty true christians would have by speaking of their life as being on a narrow road, while broad and spacious is the road leading to destruction. He also notes there would be wolves in sheeps clothing, which fits the bill of mainstream "christianity". Why do people worship in religions that caused the crusades, supported the inqusition and supported hitler. I honestly don't get it. He also noted many would call themselves his followers, but he would tell them to get away from him. Pretty heavy food for thought.
I suggest you go back and read the writtings of Marcion, Tertullian, Philo and others and see how beginning after John's death in 95 CE, true christianity was sidetracked by believers in Greek Philosophy. Also, all the pagan holidays were integrated into the "Christian" church around this time. Also re-read about the council of nicea. Constantine, who burned his wife alive in oil (after converting to christiantity), was looking for a tool to help him politically and choose to ride on the back of the christian faith. Trinity was an invention of Tertullian, who later rejected the catholic faith.
Better yet, get a good bible and read it and see if you can find any hint of trinity. If you are going to throw oout John 10:30, consider also John 17:21
Overall, I'd have to say your essay is a pretty light weight analysis, supported by only what you want to be true. But of course, this fits in with the idea at 2 Tim 4:3, 4 so it's no surprise.
Wow... I can feel the hate. I think Jesus may have said something about that. But, He anticipated that too. A quote: "basically there is big god Jehovah, little gods Jesus and Holy Spirit...thats three gods right?" Did you not do your homework or what? And have you ever really got the Bible's view of hell? Even Jesus went there at his death (Acts 2 25-27) Get the facts about your enemy before you spew. I see bias with no Scriptural support. I'm sure this comment won't matter anyway. thx
I think she's gone...
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?"
Douglas Adams
"That is not dead which can eternal lie / And with strange aeons even death may die."
H. P. Lovecraft
First - to be accurate - I do hate what "religion" has done to the practice of Christianity. It is NOTHING like what Jesus advocated. If you do nothing else, read the bible. Don't listen to the paid heretics who know nothing more than how to run a church. Most don't know the bible and are only there to tickle the ears of their members.
Second - Where's that quote from? "basically there is big god Jehovah, little gods Jesus and Holy Spirit...thats three gods right?"
Just to make sure you understand - That is not in the bible...
First the easy one - Where in the bible does the holy spirit have a personality. Not there. Instead consider these scriptures (from the bible):
Luke 1:35
Acts 10:38, 44, 45
Gen 1:2
These identify the Holy spirit as a power (like electricity), not a person.
Second, Jesus and his father being one.
Daniel 7:9
Daniel is interesting in that it gives us a mental image of what is going on in heaven. Why would someone like the son of man (Christ), have to gain entrance to the Ancient of Days, if he is part of that one?
And what was Jesus recognized as while on earth:
1. First lets ask the angel Gabriel?
Luke 1:35 -- Son of God
2. Next John the Baptist testified him to be:
John 1:34 -- Son of God
3. God himself declared him to be his son:
Matthew 17:5
4. Who did the apostle John say we need to believe Jesus to be?
1 John 4:15 -- The Son of God
5. How about the apostle Peter (the so-called "head" of the largest church in Christendom teaching the Trinity)? Let's hear from Peter:
Matthew 16:13-16 -- The Son of the Living God
6. Who did God promise to send Himself?
John 3:16 -- His only-begotten Son
7. Who did Jesus tell Thomas to believe him to be?
John 20:29-31 -- The Christ, The Son of God
8. Now, let's hear from Jesus himself. I wonder if he knew who he was???
John 10:36 -- "I am God's Son."
9. The chief priest of Israel said Jesus called himself what?
Matthew 27:43 -- God's Son
10. Now did Jesus, under oath, declare himself to be God? NO!
Matthew 26:63-64 -- God's Son
11. What about Mark? What did he have to say about it?
Mark 14:61-62 -- God's Son
12. What about the testimony of an army officer?
Mark 15:34-39 -- Son of God
13. Apostle Paul, the chief of the apostles, after getting the Truth went into the synagogues immediately and taught Jesus to be what? The number two person of a Godhead??? Let's look and see:
Acts 9:20 -- No, it's not there either. Paul said Jesus was the Son of God, after he returned to heaven.
14. Well now, we have heard from the brothers in the early Christian congregations. Maybe the brothers are mixed-up. Let's ask a sister -- Martha -- who she believed Jesus to be:
John 11:27 -- Son of God
15. What about the demons? Do you think the demons are Trinitarians? Did they believe Jesus was God himself?
Read: Luke 8:26-28
And a dictionary definition of Trinity
The word Trinity means: "a word not found in Scripture, but used to express the doctrine of the unity of God as subsisting in three distinct Persons. This word is derived from the Gr. trias, first used by Theophilus (A.D. 168-183), or from the Lat. trinitas, first used by Tertullian (A.D. 220), to express this doctrine.
So, over 130 years after Jesus death, over 70 years after John's death Theophilus was born who later in life used a word roughly equating to Trinity. Read up on what happened after the apostles died off and how pagan ideas crept into Christianity. Here's a quick example from the Catholic encyclopedia:
Tertulian from the second century on idolatry -
What less of defilement does he recur on that ground, than a business brings which, both nominally and virtually, is consecrated publicly to an idol? The Minervalia are as much Minerva's, as the Saturnalia Saturn's; Saturn's, which must necessarily be celebrated even by little slaves at the time of the Saturnalia. New-year's gifts likewise must be caught at, and the Septimontium kept; and all the presents of Midwinter and the feast of Dear Kinsmanship must be exacted; the schools must be wreathed with flowers; the flamens' wives and the ædiles sacrifice; the school is honoured on the appointed holy-days. The same thing takes place on an idol's birthday; every pomp of the devil is frequented.....
Therefore he will reject those things, and will not receive them; and will be as safe as one who from one who knows it not, knowingly accepts poison, but does not drink it.
QED - Reject Idolatry - including Saturnalia
What was Saturnalia?
Saturnalia was a large and important public festival in Rome... The celebrations included a school holiday, the making and giving of small presents (saturnalia et sigillaricia) and a special market (sigillaria).
Sure sounds like Christmas. Happens the same time of the year as well. What better way to "convert " the pagans, but to co-opt their holidays.
Easter - The English name, "Easter", and the German, "Ostern", derive from the name of a putative Anglo-Saxon Goddess of the Dawn (thus, of spring, as the dawn of the year) — called Ēaster, Ēastre, and Ēostre in various dialects of Old English and Ostara in German. In England, the annual festive time in her honor was in the "Month of Easter" or Ēostur-monath, equivalent to April/Aprilis[4].
In the Easter example, the pope excommunicated people for celebrating Christs rebirth on the correct day. (Nisan 14)
Polycarp, a disciple of John, likewise adhered to a Nisan 14 observance. Irenaeus, who observed the "first Sunday" rule notes of Polycarp (one of the Bishops of Asia Minor), "For Anicetus could not persuade Polycarp to forgo the observance [of his Nisan 14 practice] inasmuch as these things had been always observed by John the disciple of the Lord, and by other apostles with whom he had been conversant." (c. AD 180; 1.569 "Ante-Nicene Church Fathers"). Irenaeus notes that this was not only Polycarp's practice, but that this was the practice of John the disciple and the other apostles that Polycarp knew.
Polycrates (c. AD 190) emphatically notes this is the tradition passed down to him, that Passover and Unleavened Bread were kept on Nisan 14 in accord with the local interpretation of the dating of Passover: "As for us, then, we scrupulously observe the exact day, neither adding nor taking away.
"Easter" could happen on any day of the week, and was calculated using a solar/lunar calendar (The Jewish calendar)
Not today.. Check out Quartodecimanism sometime and see an example of what happened after the first century in this one small area.
From my perspective, I find it quite funny that you say the above mentioned three have "crazy" beliefs while holding on to the belief that a man, who was the son of a god, whom you've never met and existed over two thousand years ago, somehow died for your sins.
Each and every religion can look at another and say the other is crazy while agnostics look at them all with the same feelings of disbelief. I don't spend my time trying to convince people that there ISN'T a God or that the idea that Jesus died for MY sins is absurd, so why do Christians spend their time attempting to do the opposite? Just let others be.
Dear Jehovah’s Witness Regular Members and Elders: I have the following questions especially near Christmas. I will become a Jehovah’s Witness but must first have these sincere questions countered and cleared up, something my Bible study friend hasn’t done and for some reason refuses to. To begin, Colossians 2:16 says Do Not let anyone judge if you’re a Christian or not by your food, drink, celebrating a festival, New Moon or Sabbath. (also read Ga 4:10). My friend says Christians changing pagan customs to a Christian aim only mixed Darkness With Light like a pinch of poison but into clear water, but to me it looks like Christians turning Darkness Into Light, muddy water into clear water. Also, Joy is a fruit of God’s Spirit. (Ga 5:22)
From reading about Christmas etc I find the trees came from use as Eden’s Tree of Paradise in medieval church plays, not tree worship; Santa Claus is based on the gift-giver Saint Nicholas who wore bishop’s red instead of an ancient god, and the earliest Christians may have taken Christmas from Judaism’s Hannukah (Festival of Lights) holiday with its lights, gifts etc that was first celebrated December 27 but now varies in date because lunar rather than sun-based. It may also have been for countering Rome’s Saturnalia fest, not imitaing it. The name Easter may be from the word Eastern since Christianity came from the (Middle) East although the scholar Bede guessed the goddess Eastre. Easter began as a celebration of resurrection, not a vestige of fertility rites. Easter eggs and rabbits are symbols of new life or Resurrection. All Hallow’s (Holy Ones’ or Saints’) Evening or Halloween replaced the pagan harvest fest Samhain but Christians began it as a day for parents to dress kids as Saints, who had been martyred and tortured (hence scary-looking) for staying faithful to God, hoping to encourage the kids to also stay faithful.
I have been told by my study friend and seen a Watchtower publication compare the cross to A Repugnant Murder Weapon even though Paul says Boast of the cross as a symbol of Christ’s resurrection victory over death. (Ga 6:14, 1 Cor 1:17-18) I also hear Christ died on a stake but know archaeologists have found crosses, not stakes. Crucifixion takes hours as scriptures say (Lu 23:44; Mat 27:45-6) not minutes as studies show it would have by stake, and the Greek word Stauros means cross or stake never just stake. I am told I must preach at one house right after house rather than do so at a friendly house then go to one with someone interested in another town. Would you please read what Christ says at Luke 10:7? Please. I also do not understand why everyone, even those called Repentant of the worst crimes absolutely must preach at doors since Solomon said there are places for doing and not things. Sending serial murders and the like to preach at doors poses danger, so reproaches God’s name, making its use vain. Christ says pray to Our Father Who Is In Heaven; Paul says use Abba (Dad). What child would use a formal hypothetical name for his Father?
I was told the Governing Body of JWs form the Faithful and Discreet Slave over All Christians (Mt24:45) and JWs are the only one true faith (Eph 4:4) which bothers me because Christ proved he himself is that most Faithful Discreet Slave and the one faith existing when he said it was general Christianity not the Watchtower which began about 1870. To me it seems better to focus on helping the needy that trying to predict when the world might end since Christ says No One Knows The Hour Of The End.
Your main teaching is that many (namely Jehovah’s Witnesses) now living will never die but Paul says all people sin and therefore all will die. You say a Little Flock go to heaven whilst Revelation 19:1 says A Great Crowd do, (please read it) and the 144,000 figure in Revelation can be just as symbolic as 7 and 10 also are there. You say the Trinity is Worship Of A 3-headed God but I read and am told it is belief that there are three equally holy (God the Father, Jesus Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit) though different from one another, and the Father is the greatest. The threesome form a trinity that Romans 1:20 calls Godship or Divine Nature though some encyclopedists and others simply say God. Few churches teach the Modalism belief the Father morphs into Jesus and Holy Spirit.
I know for a fact all JWs are ordered to severely shun (disfellowship) those who become JWs if they speak about different beliefs or can’t get back out of a weakness like smoking. Paul (2Cor2:6) says a Majority of the Corinthians, meaning not all of them, had shunned a terrible wrongdoer as he had asked them. But again that means a Minority did not, and he could not and didn’t punished the Minority for differing with him. My point is he could Order Timothy regarding missionary assignments but not even Paul could spiritually lord it over Timothy or all other Christians. You guys say be Fitly United in faith a lot but I read unity comes from LOVE not forced same beliefs about everything. (Read Col 3:14; also all Romans 14) My conductor said when JWs quit or are disfellowshipped there’s nowhere they can go but we both know people can go right to Christ, find a more agreeable church branch of Christianity, sign in to an online fellowship and so forth.
You oppose whole blood transfusions but 1 Samuel 14:32-35 says Saul’s whole army ate Un-bled meat to live and were forgiven. I know some doctors eagerly promote bloodless operations, but it isn’t told those can cost 30 times more than regular operations; and such operations and blood expanders like saline solution cannot halt massive bleeding. In car wrecks and when giving birth, transfusions can mean life over death. Christ at Mt 12:7 says God wants Mercy not Sacrifice. Please respond to ihavesincerequestions@yahoo.com so that I can become a baptized JW with you; or give copies of this to elders or other who may help me. Thanks!